Accuracy of Anatomical Depictions in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Reconstructed Panoramic Projections Compared to Conventional Panoramic Radiographs: A Clinical Risk-Benefit Analysis

Introduction: Two-dimensional (2D) radiographs are the standard of care for diagnosis and treatment planning in the day-to-day practice of dentistry. With the growing popularity of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), it is now becoming the standard of care in many areas of general dentistry due to its ability to create non-linear projections from volumetric data. The CBCT-generated non-orthogonal radiographs can serve as easy-to-use 2D and three-dimensional (3D) diagnostic tools and offer a similar experience for diagnosis as conventional 2D images. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of conventional radiographs and CBCT-generated projections to identify relevant anatomic landmarks and their associated variants. Methods: Thirty-two patients referred to the University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine’s Advanced Imaging Center were selected for this retrospective analysis. Nineteen anatomical landmarks were retrospectively assessed on conventional panoramic and CBCT scans generated panoramic radiographs using two different digital imaging and communications in medicine viewers. A total of 1,216 anatomical landmarks were evaluated by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists to assess the accuracy and consistency of the depiction of radiographic anatomy. Results: There was a very good agreement between the two evaluators with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.934. McNemar change test concluded that the anatomical assessment values compared between conventional panoramic and CBCT-generated panoramic radiographs are similar. Conclusion: This study showed that CBCT-generated panoramic images are comparable to conventional panoramic radiographs in identifying anatomical landmarks typically evaluated using a conventional panoramic projection. In addition, they have the added advantage of having 3D information in the acquired volume to better evaluate the area of interest. In clinical situations where a mid- to large-volume CBCT scan is available, a simulated panoramic image can be generated using the CBCT volume, leaving exposure of the patient to the additional radiation of a panoramic image unnecessary.