Cargando…
Comparing diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for acute kidney injury after major surgery: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The timely identification of patients at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), along with early prevention, real-time monitoring, and prompt intervention, plays a crucial role in enhancing patient prognosis after major surgery. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple da...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37800811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035284 |
_version_ | 1785116077009666048 |
---|---|
author | Lan, Hui Liu, Xia Yang, Dongmei Zhang, De Wang, Li Hu, Liping |
author_facet | Lan, Hui Liu, Xia Yang, Dongmei Zhang, De Wang, Li Hu, Liping |
author_sort | Lan, Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The timely identification of patients at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), along with early prevention, real-time monitoring, and prompt intervention, plays a crucial role in enhancing patient prognosis after major surgery. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Cochrane Library. Each study’s risk of bias was independently evaluated as low, moderate, or high, utilizing criteria adapted from Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. The analysis was performed using STATA V.17.0 and R software V.3.4.1. Diagnostic tests were ranked based on the dominance index. We performed meta-analyses to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) individually. We then carried out a network meta-analysis to compare the performances of these biomarkers. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in this analysis. The meta-analysis findings revealed that among all the biomarkers assessed, serum cystatin C (s-CysC) (hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve [HSROC] 82%, 95% CI 0.78–0.85) exhibited the highest HSROC value. The network meta-analysis demonstrated that urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (u-KIM-1) and s-CysC displayed relatively higher sensitivity and specificity, respectively. In subgroup analyses, u-KIM-1 in the urine output (OU) group (OR 303.75, 95% CI 3.39–1844.88), s-CysC in the non-OU group (OR 10.31, 95% CI 3.09–26.2), interleukin-18 in the noncardiac surgery group (OR 46.20, 95% CI 0.48–307.68), s-CysC in the cardiac group (OR 12.42, 95% CI 2.9–35.86), u-KIM-1 in the retrospective group (OR 243.00, 95% CI 1.73–1582.11), and s-CysC in the prospective group (OR 8.35, 95% CI 2.34–21.15) had the best diagnostic accuracy. However, it is important to note that existing publication bias may reduce the reliability of the above-mentioned results. CONCLUSION: The biomarker of s-CysC has the highest HSROC value to predicting acute kidney injury after major surgery in meta-analysis and relatively higher specificity in network meta-analyses. u-KIM-1 exhibited relatively higher sensitivity, with best diagnostic accuracy in the OU and retrospective group in the subgroup analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10553025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105530252023-10-06 Comparing diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for acute kidney injury after major surgery: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis Lan, Hui Liu, Xia Yang, Dongmei Zhang, De Wang, Li Hu, Liping Medicine (Baltimore) 5200 BACKGROUND: The timely identification of patients at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), along with early prevention, real-time monitoring, and prompt intervention, plays a crucial role in enhancing patient prognosis after major surgery. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Cochrane Library. Each study’s risk of bias was independently evaluated as low, moderate, or high, utilizing criteria adapted from Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. The analysis was performed using STATA V.17.0 and R software V.3.4.1. Diagnostic tests were ranked based on the dominance index. We performed meta-analyses to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) individually. We then carried out a network meta-analysis to compare the performances of these biomarkers. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in this analysis. The meta-analysis findings revealed that among all the biomarkers assessed, serum cystatin C (s-CysC) (hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve [HSROC] 82%, 95% CI 0.78–0.85) exhibited the highest HSROC value. The network meta-analysis demonstrated that urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (u-KIM-1) and s-CysC displayed relatively higher sensitivity and specificity, respectively. In subgroup analyses, u-KIM-1 in the urine output (OU) group (OR 303.75, 95% CI 3.39–1844.88), s-CysC in the non-OU group (OR 10.31, 95% CI 3.09–26.2), interleukin-18 in the noncardiac surgery group (OR 46.20, 95% CI 0.48–307.68), s-CysC in the cardiac group (OR 12.42, 95% CI 2.9–35.86), u-KIM-1 in the retrospective group (OR 243.00, 95% CI 1.73–1582.11), and s-CysC in the prospective group (OR 8.35, 95% CI 2.34–21.15) had the best diagnostic accuracy. However, it is important to note that existing publication bias may reduce the reliability of the above-mentioned results. CONCLUSION: The biomarker of s-CysC has the highest HSROC value to predicting acute kidney injury after major surgery in meta-analysis and relatively higher specificity in network meta-analyses. u-KIM-1 exhibited relatively higher sensitivity, with best diagnostic accuracy in the OU and retrospective group in the subgroup analysis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10553025/ /pubmed/37800811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035284 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 5200 Lan, Hui Liu, Xia Yang, Dongmei Zhang, De Wang, Li Hu, Liping Comparing diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for acute kidney injury after major surgery: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Comparing diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for acute kidney injury after major surgery: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparing diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for acute kidney injury after major surgery: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparing diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for acute kidney injury after major surgery: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for acute kidney injury after major surgery: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparing diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for acute kidney injury after major surgery: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparing diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for acute kidney injury after major surgery: a prisma systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | 5200 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37800811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lanhui comparingdiagnosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforacutekidneyinjuryaftermajorsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT liuxia comparingdiagnosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforacutekidneyinjuryaftermajorsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yangdongmei comparingdiagnosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforacutekidneyinjuryaftermajorsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhangde comparingdiagnosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforacutekidneyinjuryaftermajorsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wangli comparingdiagnosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforacutekidneyinjuryaftermajorsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT huliping comparingdiagnosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforacutekidneyinjuryaftermajorsurgeryaprismasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |