Cargando…
Ranking versus rating in peer review of research grant applications
The allocation of public funds for research has been predominantly based on peer review where reviewers are asked to rate an application on some form of ordinal scale from poor to excellent. Poor reliability and bias of peer review rating has led funding agencies to experiment with different approac...
Autores principales: | Tamblyn, Robyn, Girard, Nadyne, Hanley, James, Habib, Bettina, Mota, Adrian, Khan, Karim M., Ardern, Clare L. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292306 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Detection of adverse drug events in e-prescribing and administrative health data: a validation study
por: Habib, Bettina, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Association of clinical competence, specialty and physician country of origin with opioid prescribing for chronic pain: a cohort study
por: Tamblyn, Robyn, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Do clinical and communication skills scores on credentialing exams predict potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing?
por: Tamblyn, Robyn, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Clinical competence, communication ability and adherence to choosing wisely recommendations for lipid reducing drug use in older adults
por: Tamblyn, Robyn, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices
por: Conix, Stijn, et al.
Publicado: (2021)