Cargando…

Comparing thermal strain in outdoor maintenance and indoor service workers in the mining industry during summer

While working in the heat is a common practice within the Australian mining industry, it can lead to adverse effects on cognitive function, productivity, and physical health. This study aimed to compare the thermal strain experienced by maintenance workers and service workers in the mining industry...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taggart, Sarah M., Girard, Olivier, Landers, Grant J., Ecker, Ullrich K. H., Wallman, Karen E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292436
_version_ 1785116130272083968
author Taggart, Sarah M.
Girard, Olivier
Landers, Grant J.
Ecker, Ullrich K. H.
Wallman, Karen E.
author_facet Taggart, Sarah M.
Girard, Olivier
Landers, Grant J.
Ecker, Ullrich K. H.
Wallman, Karen E.
author_sort Taggart, Sarah M.
collection PubMed
description While working in the heat is a common practice within the Australian mining industry, it can lead to adverse effects on cognitive function, productivity, and physical health. This study aimed to compare the thermal strain experienced by maintenance workers and service workers in the mining industry during summer. Psycho-physiological parameters, manual dexterity, and cognitive function were assessed in maintenance workers (n = 12) and service workers (n = 12) employed at mine site villages in north-west Australia. Maintenance workers had the freedom to self-select their work intensity and predominantly worked outdoors (33.9±4.2°C, 38±18% RH), whereas service workers had to work to a fixed schedule and worked intermittently indoors (∼64% of work shift; 29.5±3.4°C, 48±8% RH) and outdoors (∼36%; 35.4±4.6°C, 47±21% RH). All workers underwent assessment at the beginning (day 2/3), middle (day 7/8), and end of their swing (day 13/14), at various time points throughout their 11–12 h shift. Service workers completed more steps (11282±1794 vs. 7774±2821; p<0.001), experienced a higher heart rate (p = 0.049) and reported higher ratings of perceived exertion (p<0.001), thermal discomfort (p<0.001), thermal sensation (p<0.001), and fatigue (p<0.012) compared to maintenance workers. Urinary specific gravity values were higher (less hydrated) in service workers (1.024±0.007) compared to maintenance workers (1.018±0.006; p = 0.007), with USG being overall higher post- compared to pre-shift (1.022±0.008 vs. 1.020±0.006; p<0.05). Core temperature, working memory capacity, processing speed and manual dexterity did not differ between occupations. Workers in hot environments who cannot self-select their work intensity should be educated about the importance of hydration before, during, and after their work-shifts and provided with more scheduled rest breaks during their shift. Employers should closely monitor workers for symptoms of heat illness, discomfort, and fatigue to ensure the health and safety of the workers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10553273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105532732023-10-06 Comparing thermal strain in outdoor maintenance and indoor service workers in the mining industry during summer Taggart, Sarah M. Girard, Olivier Landers, Grant J. Ecker, Ullrich K. H. Wallman, Karen E. PLoS One Research Article While working in the heat is a common practice within the Australian mining industry, it can lead to adverse effects on cognitive function, productivity, and physical health. This study aimed to compare the thermal strain experienced by maintenance workers and service workers in the mining industry during summer. Psycho-physiological parameters, manual dexterity, and cognitive function were assessed in maintenance workers (n = 12) and service workers (n = 12) employed at mine site villages in north-west Australia. Maintenance workers had the freedom to self-select their work intensity and predominantly worked outdoors (33.9±4.2°C, 38±18% RH), whereas service workers had to work to a fixed schedule and worked intermittently indoors (∼64% of work shift; 29.5±3.4°C, 48±8% RH) and outdoors (∼36%; 35.4±4.6°C, 47±21% RH). All workers underwent assessment at the beginning (day 2/3), middle (day 7/8), and end of their swing (day 13/14), at various time points throughout their 11–12 h shift. Service workers completed more steps (11282±1794 vs. 7774±2821; p<0.001), experienced a higher heart rate (p = 0.049) and reported higher ratings of perceived exertion (p<0.001), thermal discomfort (p<0.001), thermal sensation (p<0.001), and fatigue (p<0.012) compared to maintenance workers. Urinary specific gravity values were higher (less hydrated) in service workers (1.024±0.007) compared to maintenance workers (1.018±0.006; p = 0.007), with USG being overall higher post- compared to pre-shift (1.022±0.008 vs. 1.020±0.006; p<0.05). Core temperature, working memory capacity, processing speed and manual dexterity did not differ between occupations. Workers in hot environments who cannot self-select their work intensity should be educated about the importance of hydration before, during, and after their work-shifts and provided with more scheduled rest breaks during their shift. Employers should closely monitor workers for symptoms of heat illness, discomfort, and fatigue to ensure the health and safety of the workers. Public Library of Science 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10553273/ /pubmed/37796853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292436 Text en © 2023 Taggart et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Taggart, Sarah M.
Girard, Olivier
Landers, Grant J.
Ecker, Ullrich K. H.
Wallman, Karen E.
Comparing thermal strain in outdoor maintenance and indoor service workers in the mining industry during summer
title Comparing thermal strain in outdoor maintenance and indoor service workers in the mining industry during summer
title_full Comparing thermal strain in outdoor maintenance and indoor service workers in the mining industry during summer
title_fullStr Comparing thermal strain in outdoor maintenance and indoor service workers in the mining industry during summer
title_full_unstemmed Comparing thermal strain in outdoor maintenance and indoor service workers in the mining industry during summer
title_short Comparing thermal strain in outdoor maintenance and indoor service workers in the mining industry during summer
title_sort comparing thermal strain in outdoor maintenance and indoor service workers in the mining industry during summer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292436
work_keys_str_mv AT taggartsarahm comparingthermalstraininoutdoormaintenanceandindoorserviceworkersintheminingindustryduringsummer
AT girardolivier comparingthermalstraininoutdoormaintenanceandindoorserviceworkersintheminingindustryduringsummer
AT landersgrantj comparingthermalstraininoutdoormaintenanceandindoorserviceworkersintheminingindustryduringsummer
AT eckerullrichkh comparingthermalstraininoutdoormaintenanceandindoorserviceworkersintheminingindustryduringsummer
AT wallmankarene comparingthermalstraininoutdoormaintenanceandindoorserviceworkersintheminingindustryduringsummer