Cargando…

Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®)

BACKGROUND: Little is known about patient preferences and the value of pharmacy-collaborative disease management with primary care using technology-driven interprofessional communication under real-world conditions. Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) are useful for quantifying preferences for non-ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costa, Suzete, Guerreiro, José, Teixeira, Inês, Helling, Dennis K., Mateus, Céu, Pereira, João
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292308
_version_ 1785116131477946368
author Costa, Suzete
Guerreiro, José
Teixeira, Inês
Helling, Dennis K.
Mateus, Céu
Pereira, João
author_facet Costa, Suzete
Guerreiro, José
Teixeira, Inês
Helling, Dennis K.
Mateus, Céu
Pereira, João
author_sort Costa, Suzete
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about patient preferences and the value of pharmacy-collaborative disease management with primary care using technology-driven interprofessional communication under real-world conditions. Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) are useful for quantifying preferences for non-market services. OBJECTIVES: 1) To explore variation in patient preferences and estimate willingness-to-accept annual cost to the National Health Service (NHS) for attributes of a collaborative intervention trial between pharmacies and primary care using a trial exit DCE interview; 2) to incorporate a DCE into an economic evaluation using cost-benefit analysis (CBA). METHODS: We performed a DCE telephone interview with a sample of hypertension and hyperlipidemia trial patients 12 months after trial onset. We used five attributes (levels): waiting time to get urgent/not urgent medical appointment (7 days/45 days; 48 hrs./30 days; same day/15 days), model of pharmacy intervention (5-min. counter basic check; 15-min. office every 3 months for BP and medication review of selected medicines; 30-min. office every 6 months for comprehensive measurements and medication review of all medicines), integration with primary care (weak; partial; full), chance of having a stroke in 5 years (same; slightly lower; much lower), and annual cost to the NHS (0€; 30€; 51€; 76€). We used an experimental orthogonal fractional factorial design. Data were analyzed using conditional logit. We subtracted the estimated annual incremental trial costs from the mean WTA (Net Benefit) for CBA. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients completed the survey. Waiting time to get medical appointment—on the same day (urgent) and within 15 days (non-urgent)—was the most important attribute, followed by 30-minute pharmacy intervention in private office every 6 months for point-of-care measurements and medication review of all medicines, and full integration with primary care. The cost attribute was not significant. Intervention patients were willing to accept the NHS annual cost of €877 for their preferred scenario. The annual net benefit per patient is €788.20 and represents the monetary value of patients’ welfare surplus for this model. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first conducted in Portugal alongside a pharmacy collaborative trial, incorporating DCE into CBA. The findings can be used to guide the design of pharmacy collaborative interventions with primary care with the potential for reimbursement for uncontrolled or at-risk chronic disease patients informed by patient preferences. Future DCE studies conducted in community pharmacy may provide additional contributions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN): ISRCTN13410498, retrospectively registered on 12 December 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10553278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105532782023-10-06 Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®) Costa, Suzete Guerreiro, José Teixeira, Inês Helling, Dennis K. Mateus, Céu Pereira, João PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Little is known about patient preferences and the value of pharmacy-collaborative disease management with primary care using technology-driven interprofessional communication under real-world conditions. Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) are useful for quantifying preferences for non-market services. OBJECTIVES: 1) To explore variation in patient preferences and estimate willingness-to-accept annual cost to the National Health Service (NHS) for attributes of a collaborative intervention trial between pharmacies and primary care using a trial exit DCE interview; 2) to incorporate a DCE into an economic evaluation using cost-benefit analysis (CBA). METHODS: We performed a DCE telephone interview with a sample of hypertension and hyperlipidemia trial patients 12 months after trial onset. We used five attributes (levels): waiting time to get urgent/not urgent medical appointment (7 days/45 days; 48 hrs./30 days; same day/15 days), model of pharmacy intervention (5-min. counter basic check; 15-min. office every 3 months for BP and medication review of selected medicines; 30-min. office every 6 months for comprehensive measurements and medication review of all medicines), integration with primary care (weak; partial; full), chance of having a stroke in 5 years (same; slightly lower; much lower), and annual cost to the NHS (0€; 30€; 51€; 76€). We used an experimental orthogonal fractional factorial design. Data were analyzed using conditional logit. We subtracted the estimated annual incremental trial costs from the mean WTA (Net Benefit) for CBA. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients completed the survey. Waiting time to get medical appointment—on the same day (urgent) and within 15 days (non-urgent)—was the most important attribute, followed by 30-minute pharmacy intervention in private office every 6 months for point-of-care measurements and medication review of all medicines, and full integration with primary care. The cost attribute was not significant. Intervention patients were willing to accept the NHS annual cost of €877 for their preferred scenario. The annual net benefit per patient is €788.20 and represents the monetary value of patients’ welfare surplus for this model. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first conducted in Portugal alongside a pharmacy collaborative trial, incorporating DCE into CBA. The findings can be used to guide the design of pharmacy collaborative interventions with primary care with the potential for reimbursement for uncontrolled or at-risk chronic disease patients informed by patient preferences. Future DCE studies conducted in community pharmacy may provide additional contributions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN): ISRCTN13410498, retrospectively registered on 12 December 2018. Public Library of Science 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10553278/ /pubmed/37796918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292308 Text en © 2023 Costa et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Costa, Suzete
Guerreiro, José
Teixeira, Inês
Helling, Dennis K.
Mateus, Céu
Pereira, João
Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®)
title Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®)
title_full Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®)
title_fullStr Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®)
title_full_unstemmed Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®)
title_short Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®)
title_sort patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in portugal: a discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (usfarmácia®)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292308
work_keys_str_mv AT costasuzete patientpreferencesandcostbenefitofhypertensionandhyperlipidemiacollaborativemanagementmodelbetweenpharmaciesandprimarycareinportugaladiscretechoiceexperimentalongsideatrialusfarmacia
AT guerreirojose patientpreferencesandcostbenefitofhypertensionandhyperlipidemiacollaborativemanagementmodelbetweenpharmaciesandprimarycareinportugaladiscretechoiceexperimentalongsideatrialusfarmacia
AT teixeiraines patientpreferencesandcostbenefitofhypertensionandhyperlipidemiacollaborativemanagementmodelbetweenpharmaciesandprimarycareinportugaladiscretechoiceexperimentalongsideatrialusfarmacia
AT hellingdennisk patientpreferencesandcostbenefitofhypertensionandhyperlipidemiacollaborativemanagementmodelbetweenpharmaciesandprimarycareinportugaladiscretechoiceexperimentalongsideatrialusfarmacia
AT mateusceu patientpreferencesandcostbenefitofhypertensionandhyperlipidemiacollaborativemanagementmodelbetweenpharmaciesandprimarycareinportugaladiscretechoiceexperimentalongsideatrialusfarmacia
AT pereirajoao patientpreferencesandcostbenefitofhypertensionandhyperlipidemiacollaborativemanagementmodelbetweenpharmaciesandprimarycareinportugaladiscretechoiceexperimentalongsideatrialusfarmacia