Cargando…

Comparative analysis of disease modelling for health economic evaluations of systemic therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to systematically analyse methodological and structural assumptions utilised in model-based health economic evaluations of systemic advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapies, discuss the existing challenges, and develop methodological recommendatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zou, Huimin, Xue, Yan, Chen, Xianwen, Lai, Yunfeng, Yao, Dongning, Ung, Carolina Oi Lam, Hu, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292239
_version_ 1785116135828488192
author Zou, Huimin
Xue, Yan
Chen, Xianwen
Lai, Yunfeng
Yao, Dongning
Ung, Carolina Oi Lam
Hu, Hao
author_facet Zou, Huimin
Xue, Yan
Chen, Xianwen
Lai, Yunfeng
Yao, Dongning
Ung, Carolina Oi Lam
Hu, Hao
author_sort Zou, Huimin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to systematically analyse methodological and structural assumptions utilised in model-based health economic evaluations of systemic advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapies, discuss the existing challenges, and develop methodological recommendations for future models in advanced HCC. METHODS: We performed literature searches using five databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Econlit, and CNKI) up to December 4, 2022. Technology appraisals from Canada, England, Australia, and the United States were also considered. Model-based full economic evaluations of systemic advanced HCC therapies in English or Chinese met the eligibility criteria. The reporting quality was assessed by using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist. RESULTS: Of 12,863 records retrieved, 55 were eligible for inclusion. Markov model (n = 29, 53%) and partitioned survival model (n = 27, 49%) were the most commonly used modelling techniques. Most studies were based on health-state-driven structure (n = 51, 93%), followed by treatment-line-driven structure (n = 2, 4%) and combination structure (n = 1, 2%). Only three studies (5%) adopted external real-world data to extrapolate the overall survival or calibrate the extrapolation. Few studies reported the assumptions of transition probabilities. Utility modelling approaches were state-based (n = 51, 93%) and time-to-death (n = 1, 2%). Only 13 studies (24%) reported five types of model validation. Economic evaluation results of specific treatment strategies varied among studies. CONCLUSIONS: Disease modelling for health economic evaluations of systemic therapies in advanced HCC has adopted various modelling approaches and assumptions, leading to marked uncertainties in results. By proposing methodological recommendations, we suggest that future model-based studies for health economic evaluation of HCC therapies should follow good modelling practice guidelines and improve modelling methods to generate reliable health and economic evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10553296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105532962023-10-06 Comparative analysis of disease modelling for health economic evaluations of systemic therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma Zou, Huimin Xue, Yan Chen, Xianwen Lai, Yunfeng Yao, Dongning Ung, Carolina Oi Lam Hu, Hao PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to systematically analyse methodological and structural assumptions utilised in model-based health economic evaluations of systemic advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapies, discuss the existing challenges, and develop methodological recommendations for future models in advanced HCC. METHODS: We performed literature searches using five databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Econlit, and CNKI) up to December 4, 2022. Technology appraisals from Canada, England, Australia, and the United States were also considered. Model-based full economic evaluations of systemic advanced HCC therapies in English or Chinese met the eligibility criteria. The reporting quality was assessed by using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist. RESULTS: Of 12,863 records retrieved, 55 were eligible for inclusion. Markov model (n = 29, 53%) and partitioned survival model (n = 27, 49%) were the most commonly used modelling techniques. Most studies were based on health-state-driven structure (n = 51, 93%), followed by treatment-line-driven structure (n = 2, 4%) and combination structure (n = 1, 2%). Only three studies (5%) adopted external real-world data to extrapolate the overall survival or calibrate the extrapolation. Few studies reported the assumptions of transition probabilities. Utility modelling approaches were state-based (n = 51, 93%) and time-to-death (n = 1, 2%). Only 13 studies (24%) reported five types of model validation. Economic evaluation results of specific treatment strategies varied among studies. CONCLUSIONS: Disease modelling for health economic evaluations of systemic therapies in advanced HCC has adopted various modelling approaches and assumptions, leading to marked uncertainties in results. By proposing methodological recommendations, we suggest that future model-based studies for health economic evaluation of HCC therapies should follow good modelling practice guidelines and improve modelling methods to generate reliable health and economic evidence. Public Library of Science 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10553296/ /pubmed/37796814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292239 Text en © 2023 Zou et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zou, Huimin
Xue, Yan
Chen, Xianwen
Lai, Yunfeng
Yao, Dongning
Ung, Carolina Oi Lam
Hu, Hao
Comparative analysis of disease modelling for health economic evaluations of systemic therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title Comparative analysis of disease modelling for health economic evaluations of systemic therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Comparative analysis of disease modelling for health economic evaluations of systemic therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of disease modelling for health economic evaluations of systemic therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of disease modelling for health economic evaluations of systemic therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Comparative analysis of disease modelling for health economic evaluations of systemic therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort comparative analysis of disease modelling for health economic evaluations of systemic therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292239
work_keys_str_mv AT zouhuimin comparativeanalysisofdiseasemodellingforhealtheconomicevaluationsofsystemictherapiesinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT xueyan comparativeanalysisofdiseasemodellingforhealtheconomicevaluationsofsystemictherapiesinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT chenxianwen comparativeanalysisofdiseasemodellingforhealtheconomicevaluationsofsystemictherapiesinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT laiyunfeng comparativeanalysisofdiseasemodellingforhealtheconomicevaluationsofsystemictherapiesinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT yaodongning comparativeanalysisofdiseasemodellingforhealtheconomicevaluationsofsystemictherapiesinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT ungcarolinaoilam comparativeanalysisofdiseasemodellingforhealtheconomicevaluationsofsystemictherapiesinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT huhao comparativeanalysisofdiseasemodellingforhealtheconomicevaluationsofsystemictherapiesinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma