Cargando…

Preferences for public engagement in decision-making regarding four COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the Netherlands: A survey study

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) were implemented during the COVID-19 crisis, which heavily impacted the daily lives of citizens. This study considers public perspectives on whether and how public engagement (PE) can contribute to future decision-making about NPIs. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kemper, Sophie, Bongers, Marloes, Kupper, Frank, De Vries, Marion, Timen, Aura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292119
_version_ 1785116152311054336
author Kemper, Sophie
Bongers, Marloes
Kupper, Frank
De Vries, Marion
Timen, Aura
author_facet Kemper, Sophie
Bongers, Marloes
Kupper, Frank
De Vries, Marion
Timen, Aura
author_sort Kemper, Sophie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Worldwide, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) were implemented during the COVID-19 crisis, which heavily impacted the daily lives of citizens. This study considers public perspectives on whether and how public engagement (PE) can contribute to future decision-making about NPIs. METHODS: An online survey was conducted among a representative sample of the public in the Netherlands from 27 October to 9 November 2021. Perceptions and preferences about PE in decision-making on NPIs to control COVID-19 were collected. Preferences regarding four NPIs were studied: Nightly curfew (NC); Digital Covid Certificate (DCC); Closure of elementary schools and daycares (CED); and physical distancing (1.5M). Engagement was surveyed based on the five participation modes of the IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation, namely inform, consult, advice, collaborate and empower. RESULTS: Of the 4981 respondents, 25% expressed a desire to engage in decision-making, as they thought engagement could improve their understanding and the quality of NPIs, as well as increase their trust in the government. Especially for the NPIs DCC and NC, respondents found it valuable to engage and provide their perspective on trade-offs in values (e.g. opening up society versus division in society by vaccination status). Respondents agreed that the main responsibility in decision-making should stay with experts and policy-makers. 50% of respondents did not want to engage, as they felt no need to engage or considered themselves insufficiently knowledgeable. Inform was deemed the most preferred mode of engagement, and empower the least preferred mode of engagement. CONCLUSION: We reveal large variations in public preferences regarding engagement in NPI decision-making. With 25% of respondents expressing an explicit desire to engage, and considering the benefit of PE in other areas of (public) health, opportunities for PE in NPI decision-making might have been overlooked during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results provide guidance into when and how to execute PE in future outbreaks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10553365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105533652023-10-06 Preferences for public engagement in decision-making regarding four COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the Netherlands: A survey study Kemper, Sophie Bongers, Marloes Kupper, Frank De Vries, Marion Timen, Aura PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Worldwide, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) were implemented during the COVID-19 crisis, which heavily impacted the daily lives of citizens. This study considers public perspectives on whether and how public engagement (PE) can contribute to future decision-making about NPIs. METHODS: An online survey was conducted among a representative sample of the public in the Netherlands from 27 October to 9 November 2021. Perceptions and preferences about PE in decision-making on NPIs to control COVID-19 were collected. Preferences regarding four NPIs were studied: Nightly curfew (NC); Digital Covid Certificate (DCC); Closure of elementary schools and daycares (CED); and physical distancing (1.5M). Engagement was surveyed based on the five participation modes of the IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation, namely inform, consult, advice, collaborate and empower. RESULTS: Of the 4981 respondents, 25% expressed a desire to engage in decision-making, as they thought engagement could improve their understanding and the quality of NPIs, as well as increase their trust in the government. Especially for the NPIs DCC and NC, respondents found it valuable to engage and provide their perspective on trade-offs in values (e.g. opening up society versus division in society by vaccination status). Respondents agreed that the main responsibility in decision-making should stay with experts and policy-makers. 50% of respondents did not want to engage, as they felt no need to engage or considered themselves insufficiently knowledgeable. Inform was deemed the most preferred mode of engagement, and empower the least preferred mode of engagement. CONCLUSION: We reveal large variations in public preferences regarding engagement in NPI decision-making. With 25% of respondents expressing an explicit desire to engage, and considering the benefit of PE in other areas of (public) health, opportunities for PE in NPI decision-making might have been overlooked during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results provide guidance into when and how to execute PE in future outbreaks. Public Library of Science 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10553365/ /pubmed/37796885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292119 Text en © 2023 Kemper et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kemper, Sophie
Bongers, Marloes
Kupper, Frank
De Vries, Marion
Timen, Aura
Preferences for public engagement in decision-making regarding four COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the Netherlands: A survey study
title Preferences for public engagement in decision-making regarding four COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the Netherlands: A survey study
title_full Preferences for public engagement in decision-making regarding four COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the Netherlands: A survey study
title_fullStr Preferences for public engagement in decision-making regarding four COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the Netherlands: A survey study
title_full_unstemmed Preferences for public engagement in decision-making regarding four COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the Netherlands: A survey study
title_short Preferences for public engagement in decision-making regarding four COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the Netherlands: A survey study
title_sort preferences for public engagement in decision-making regarding four covid-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the netherlands: a survey study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292119
work_keys_str_mv AT kempersophie preferencesforpublicengagementindecisionmakingregardingfourcovid19nonpharmaceuticalinterventionsinthenetherlandsasurveystudy
AT bongersmarloes preferencesforpublicengagementindecisionmakingregardingfourcovid19nonpharmaceuticalinterventionsinthenetherlandsasurveystudy
AT kupperfrank preferencesforpublicengagementindecisionmakingregardingfourcovid19nonpharmaceuticalinterventionsinthenetherlandsasurveystudy
AT devriesmarion preferencesforpublicengagementindecisionmakingregardingfourcovid19nonpharmaceuticalinterventionsinthenetherlandsasurveystudy
AT timenaura preferencesforpublicengagementindecisionmakingregardingfourcovid19nonpharmaceuticalinterventionsinthenetherlandsasurveystudy