Cargando…

SAT105 Frequent Monitoring Of Blood Glucose Levels Via A Remote Patient Monitoring System Helps Improve Glycemic Control

Disclosure: I. Sachmechi: None. M. Amini: None. S. Salam: None. R. Khan: None. A. Spitznogle: None. T. Belen: None. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Vivovitals telehealth platform on improving glycemic control and reducing A1C in patients with uncontrolled type II diab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sachmechi, Issac, Amini, Masoud, Salam, Sanna, Khan, Rubba, Spitznogle, Andrew, Belen, Tasheena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553395/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvad114.971
Descripción
Sumario:Disclosure: I. Sachmechi: None. M. Amini: None. S. Salam: None. R. Khan: None. A. Spitznogle: None. T. Belen: None. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Vivovitals telehealth platform on improving glycemic control and reducing A1C in patients with uncontrolled type II diabetes mellitus by providing more accessible and frequent patient care under the monitoring by their physician. Methods: This 12-week, prospective, pragmatic, single-center, double-arm study assessed the impact of the Vivovitals diabetes platform on glycemic control among 78 adults ≥ 18 years of age, with A1C ≥ 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) at baseline. The participants were randomized into two groups. The control group received standard care, while the intervention group was assisted to install the application on their smartphones and connect it to a Bluetooth Glucometer, and access to an online data portal. Blood glucose measurements were transmitted to the provider daily. Patients were contacted twice weekly regardless of their blood sugar measurements and additional call was made if blood glucose levels were <70 mg/dL or >180 mg/dL and modifications were made to diet and medication. The control group was allowed to call the provider if they have questions regarding their blood sugar levels or their medications. The two groups were compared at baseline and 12 weeks using nonparametric tests with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean A1C in the intervention group (n=39) was 9.53 (81 mmol/mol) +1.68 at baseline. Post-trial, mean A1C decreased to 7.99 (64 mmol/mol) + 1.40 (p < 0.001). In comparison, the mean A1C in the control group (n=39) was 9.63 (64 mmol/mol) + 1.47 at baseline with little change in post-trial mean A1C averaging 9.16 (77 mmol/mol) + 1.51 (p = 0.87). Discussion: In this study, patients who utilized the Vivovitals platform saw a significant decrease in A1C at an average of 1.56% compared to the non-significant 0.47% A1C reduction in the control group participants. We believe the A1C-reducing effect in the intervention group was due to the more frequent interactions with the physician and subsequent medication adjustments based on the data provided. The Vivovitals platform allows an affordable closer monitoring of blood glucose levels, identification of the direction of glycemic trends, and earlier intervention. While not explored in this study, it is reasonable to believe that the use of the Vivovitals diabetes platform could reduce Emergency Department visits and inpatient hospitalizations for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia as the clinician can intervene before a patient becomes symptomatic. Conclusion: We conclude that the Vivovitals platform may help to reduce A1C in adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus in conjunction with lifestyle modifications and anti-diabetic medications. Presentation: Saturday, June 17, 2023