Cargando…
THU589 Positivity Rates Of Screening Criteria For Primary Aldosteronism: A Cohort Comparison Study
Disclosure: M. Marcelli: None. A. Panov: None. C. Bi: None. J.W. Funder: None. M.J. McPhaul: None. Current screening for primary aldosteronism (PA) relies on a single blood draw for plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and plasma renin activity (PRA) to establish an aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10554738/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvad114.587 |
_version_ | 1785116484580671488 |
---|---|
author | Marcelli, Marco Panov, Alexandra Bi, Caixia Funder, John W John McPhaul, Michael |
author_facet | Marcelli, Marco Panov, Alexandra Bi, Caixia Funder, John W John McPhaul, Michael |
author_sort | Marcelli, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Disclosure: M. Marcelli: None. A. Panov: None. C. Bi: None. J.W. Funder: None. M.J. McPhaul: None. Current screening for primary aldosteronism (PA) relies on a single blood draw for plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and plasma renin activity (PRA) to establish an aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR). However, ARR cutoff levels vary between expert centers. Many studies have demonstrated that PAC may not represent a patient’s actual aldosterone status, suggesting the possible fallibility of the ARR. To investigate this possibility, we compared the positivity rates of 2 indicators of probable PA—ARR>28.9 and suppressed renin (PRA<1 ng/ml/hr)—in a cohort of 38,507 paired PAC and PRA samples. For each indicator, we also assessed positivity rates by self-reported sex (20578 [53.5%] women, 17882 [46.5%] men). Of the cohort, 1623 (4.2%) tested positive for possible PA based on an ARR of 28.9; 19551 (50.8%) tested positive for suppressed renin. Among the latter group, 2585 (6.7%) had PAC>15 ng/dL, 8465 (22%) between 5-15 ng/dL, and 8501 (22.1%) < 5 ng/dL. A recent algorithm suggested by Vaidya (1) defines the first of these groups as overtly positive screening and the second, intermediate group as positive screening, for a total positivity rate of 28.7%. Given the suppressed renin, there are probably a handful of positive PA cases, even in the 22.1 % group with PAC<5 ng/dL. A second finding was that rates of probable PA differed by sex. These differences were minor for the ARR criterion (4.3% of women vs. 4.1% of men tested positive) but major for the suppressed renin criterion with PAC>15 ng/dL (5.7% of women vs. 7.9% of men tested positive) and 5-15 ng/dL (23.6% of women vs. 20.2 of men tested positive). Florid PA was the only condition where more males than females tested positive, a finding deserving further expert consideration and study. In comparing two indicators of probable PA, the ARR criterion yielded a lower positivity rate than the suppressed renin criterion, suggesting that most PA cases may remain undetected if using AAR as a screening test.Reference: (1) JCEM 2020;105:3771 Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10554738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105547382023-10-06 THU589 Positivity Rates Of Screening Criteria For Primary Aldosteronism: A Cohort Comparison Study Marcelli, Marco Panov, Alexandra Bi, Caixia Funder, John W John McPhaul, Michael J Endocr Soc Cardiovascular Endocrinology Disclosure: M. Marcelli: None. A. Panov: None. C. Bi: None. J.W. Funder: None. M.J. McPhaul: None. Current screening for primary aldosteronism (PA) relies on a single blood draw for plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and plasma renin activity (PRA) to establish an aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR). However, ARR cutoff levels vary between expert centers. Many studies have demonstrated that PAC may not represent a patient’s actual aldosterone status, suggesting the possible fallibility of the ARR. To investigate this possibility, we compared the positivity rates of 2 indicators of probable PA—ARR>28.9 and suppressed renin (PRA<1 ng/ml/hr)—in a cohort of 38,507 paired PAC and PRA samples. For each indicator, we also assessed positivity rates by self-reported sex (20578 [53.5%] women, 17882 [46.5%] men). Of the cohort, 1623 (4.2%) tested positive for possible PA based on an ARR of 28.9; 19551 (50.8%) tested positive for suppressed renin. Among the latter group, 2585 (6.7%) had PAC>15 ng/dL, 8465 (22%) between 5-15 ng/dL, and 8501 (22.1%) < 5 ng/dL. A recent algorithm suggested by Vaidya (1) defines the first of these groups as overtly positive screening and the second, intermediate group as positive screening, for a total positivity rate of 28.7%. Given the suppressed renin, there are probably a handful of positive PA cases, even in the 22.1 % group with PAC<5 ng/dL. A second finding was that rates of probable PA differed by sex. These differences were minor for the ARR criterion (4.3% of women vs. 4.1% of men tested positive) but major for the suppressed renin criterion with PAC>15 ng/dL (5.7% of women vs. 7.9% of men tested positive) and 5-15 ng/dL (23.6% of women vs. 20.2 of men tested positive). Florid PA was the only condition where more males than females tested positive, a finding deserving further expert consideration and study. In comparing two indicators of probable PA, the ARR criterion yielded a lower positivity rate than the suppressed renin criterion, suggesting that most PA cases may remain undetected if using AAR as a screening test.Reference: (1) JCEM 2020;105:3771 Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023 Oxford University Press 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10554738/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvad114.587 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Endocrinology Marcelli, Marco Panov, Alexandra Bi, Caixia Funder, John W John McPhaul, Michael THU589 Positivity Rates Of Screening Criteria For Primary Aldosteronism: A Cohort Comparison Study |
title | THU589 Positivity Rates Of Screening Criteria For Primary Aldosteronism: A Cohort Comparison Study |
title_full | THU589 Positivity Rates Of Screening Criteria For Primary Aldosteronism: A Cohort Comparison Study |
title_fullStr | THU589 Positivity Rates Of Screening Criteria For Primary Aldosteronism: A Cohort Comparison Study |
title_full_unstemmed | THU589 Positivity Rates Of Screening Criteria For Primary Aldosteronism: A Cohort Comparison Study |
title_short | THU589 Positivity Rates Of Screening Criteria For Primary Aldosteronism: A Cohort Comparison Study |
title_sort | thu589 positivity rates of screening criteria for primary aldosteronism: a cohort comparison study |
topic | Cardiovascular Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10554738/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvad114.587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marcellimarco thu589positivityratesofscreeningcriteriaforprimaryaldosteronismacohortcomparisonstudy AT panovalexandra thu589positivityratesofscreeningcriteriaforprimaryaldosteronismacohortcomparisonstudy AT bicaixia thu589positivityratesofscreeningcriteriaforprimaryaldosteronismacohortcomparisonstudy AT funderjohnw thu589positivityratesofscreeningcriteriaforprimaryaldosteronismacohortcomparisonstudy AT johnmcphaulmichael thu589positivityratesofscreeningcriteriaforprimaryaldosteronismacohortcomparisonstudy |