Cargando…

Intravascular ultrasound to aid in the diagnosis and revision of an intra-aortic pedicle screw: illustrative case

BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw impingement on vessel walls has the potential for complications due to pulsatile effects and wall erosion. Artifacts from spinal instrumentation create difficulty in accurately evaluating this interface. The authors present the first case of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehlers, Landon D., Opperman, Patrick J., Mordeson, Jack E., Thompson, Jonathan R., Surdell, Daniel L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association of Neurological Surgeons 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10555651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37728279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/CASE23272
_version_ 1785116703682723840
author Ehlers, Landon D.
Opperman, Patrick J.
Mordeson, Jack E.
Thompson, Jonathan R.
Surdell, Daniel L.
author_facet Ehlers, Landon D.
Opperman, Patrick J.
Mordeson, Jack E.
Thompson, Jonathan R.
Surdell, Daniel L.
author_sort Ehlers, Landon D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw impingement on vessel walls has the potential for complications due to pulsatile effects and wall erosion. Artifacts from spinal instrumentation create difficulty in accurately evaluating this interface. The authors present the first case of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) used to characterize a pedicle screw breach into the aortic lumen. OBSERVATIONS: A 21-year-old female with surgically corrected scoliosis underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) 3 years postoperatively, which revealed a pedicle screw within the thoracic aorta lumen. Metal artifact distorted the CTA images, which prompted the decision to use intraoperative IVUS. The IVUS confirmed the noninvasive imaging findings and guided final decisions regarding aortic endograft size and location during spine hardware revision. LESSONS: For asymptomatic patients presenting with pedicle screws malpositioned in or near the aorta, treatment decisions revolve around the extent of vessel wall penetration. Intraluminal depth can be obscured by artifact on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging or inadequately evaluated by a transesophageal echocardiogram. In our intraoperative experience, IVUS confirmed the depth of vessel lumen violation by a single pedicle screw and no wall penetration by two additional screws of concern. This was useful in deciding on thoracic endovascular aortic repair graft size and landing zone and facilitated safe spinal instrumentation removal and revision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10555651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Association of Neurological Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105556512023-10-07 Intravascular ultrasound to aid in the diagnosis and revision of an intra-aortic pedicle screw: illustrative case Ehlers, Landon D. Opperman, Patrick J. Mordeson, Jack E. Thompson, Jonathan R. Surdell, Daniel L. J Neurosurg Case Lessons Case Lesson BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw impingement on vessel walls has the potential for complications due to pulsatile effects and wall erosion. Artifacts from spinal instrumentation create difficulty in accurately evaluating this interface. The authors present the first case of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) used to characterize a pedicle screw breach into the aortic lumen. OBSERVATIONS: A 21-year-old female with surgically corrected scoliosis underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) 3 years postoperatively, which revealed a pedicle screw within the thoracic aorta lumen. Metal artifact distorted the CTA images, which prompted the decision to use intraoperative IVUS. The IVUS confirmed the noninvasive imaging findings and guided final decisions regarding aortic endograft size and location during spine hardware revision. LESSONS: For asymptomatic patients presenting with pedicle screws malpositioned in or near the aorta, treatment decisions revolve around the extent of vessel wall penetration. Intraluminal depth can be obscured by artifact on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging or inadequately evaluated by a transesophageal echocardiogram. In our intraoperative experience, IVUS confirmed the depth of vessel lumen violation by a single pedicle screw and no wall penetration by two additional screws of concern. This was useful in deciding on thoracic endovascular aortic repair graft size and landing zone and facilitated safe spinal instrumentation removal and revision. American Association of Neurological Surgeons 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10555651/ /pubmed/37728279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/CASE23272 Text en © 2023 The authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Case Lesson
Ehlers, Landon D.
Opperman, Patrick J.
Mordeson, Jack E.
Thompson, Jonathan R.
Surdell, Daniel L.
Intravascular ultrasound to aid in the diagnosis and revision of an intra-aortic pedicle screw: illustrative case
title Intravascular ultrasound to aid in the diagnosis and revision of an intra-aortic pedicle screw: illustrative case
title_full Intravascular ultrasound to aid in the diagnosis and revision of an intra-aortic pedicle screw: illustrative case
title_fullStr Intravascular ultrasound to aid in the diagnosis and revision of an intra-aortic pedicle screw: illustrative case
title_full_unstemmed Intravascular ultrasound to aid in the diagnosis and revision of an intra-aortic pedicle screw: illustrative case
title_short Intravascular ultrasound to aid in the diagnosis and revision of an intra-aortic pedicle screw: illustrative case
title_sort intravascular ultrasound to aid in the diagnosis and revision of an intra-aortic pedicle screw: illustrative case
topic Case Lesson
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10555651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37728279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/CASE23272
work_keys_str_mv AT ehlerslandond intravascularultrasoundtoaidinthediagnosisandrevisionofanintraaorticpediclescrewillustrativecase
AT oppermanpatrickj intravascularultrasoundtoaidinthediagnosisandrevisionofanintraaorticpediclescrewillustrativecase
AT mordesonjacke intravascularultrasoundtoaidinthediagnosisandrevisionofanintraaorticpediclescrewillustrativecase
AT thompsonjonathanr intravascularultrasoundtoaidinthediagnosisandrevisionofanintraaorticpediclescrewillustrativecase
AT surdelldaniell intravascularultrasoundtoaidinthediagnosisandrevisionofanintraaorticpediclescrewillustrativecase