THU296 Effect Of Tirzepatide In GADA-positive Individuals With T2D: A Post Hoc Analysis Of The SURPASS 2-5 Trials

Disclosure: A.L. Peters: Advisory Board Member; Self; Abbott Diabetes Care, Eli Lilly & Company, Medscape, Novo Nordisk, Zealand. Grant Recipient; Self; Dexcom, Insulet Corporation. Stock Owner; Self; Omada Health, Teladoc. Other; Self; Abbott Diabetes Care. R. Buzzetti: Consulting Fee; Self; Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly & Company. Speaker; Self; AstraZeneca, Abbott Laboratories. C.J. Lee: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly & Company. Stock Owner; Self; Eli Lilly & Company. I. Pavo: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly & Company. Stock Owner; Self; Eli Lilly & Company. M. Liu: Other; Self; Eli Lilly & Company. J.S. Paik: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly & Company. Stock Owner; Self; Eli Lilly & Company. Tirzepatide, a novel once weekly GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, is approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). People with T2D and positive glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA), which is also referred to as latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), may often remain undetected and may be associated with more rapid progression to insulin therapy. The diagnosis is primarily made by the presence of GADA in patients previously diagnosed with T2D. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate the effect of tirzepatide on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in people with T2D who were GADA-positive versus GADA-negative from the Phase 3 SURPASS clinical trial program. Tirzepatide-treated patients from SURPASS 2-5 studies were included in this analysis. Patients who had GADA concentrations ≥5 IU/mL were categorized as GADA-positive (ELISA, RSR Ltd., Cardiff, UK). Change from baseline in HbA1c at 40/42 weeks was assessed in GADA-positive vs GADA-negative patients using mixed model repeated measures from the efficacy analysis set, adjusting for baseline covariates including study, sex, HbA1c, and body mass index (BMI). All randomized patients who took at least one dose of study drug, excluding patients who discontinued study drug due to inadvertent enrollment and excluding data after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of study drug, were included in this analysis. Of the 3827 tirzepatide-treated patients who were tested for GADA, 3671 (95.9%) were GADA-negative, 120 (3.2%) were GADA-positive, and 36 (0.9%) were “no GADA status”. Baseline parameters were similar between the groups, except for baseline BMI and serum triglyceride concentration which were slightly lower in GADA-positive patients compared to GADA-negative patients (mean baseline BMI [SD] 32.2 [6.1] vs 33.6 [6.3] kg/m(2), mean triglycerides 169.2 [101.3] vs 188.1 [131.4] mg/dL). At 40/42 weeks, both groups achieved significant reductions in HbA1c (-2.11% vs -2.32%; p<0.001 for both groups) and body weight (-9.2 kg vs -9.6 kg; p<0.001 for both groups), for GADA-positive vs. GADA-negative patients, respectively. Reductions in HbA1c were slightly greater in GADA-negative patients (estimated treatment differences [95% confidence interval]: 0.21% [0.03, 0.39]; p=0.024), whereas reductions in body weight did not significantly differ between groups (0.38 kg [-0.99, 1.75]; p=0.588). These data demonstrate that tirzepatide was effective in reducing HbA1c and body weight, irrespective of GADA status in adults with T2D, thus suggesting that tirzepatide may be effective to improve glycemic control in GADA-positive individuals. Future studies could help elucidate the long-term impact of GADA positivity on the progression of diabetes. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023