Cargando…
Methodological considerations for the force-matching task
ABSTRACT: The force-matching task integrates haptic technology and electrical engineering to determine an individual’s level of sensory attenuation to somatic stimuli. The task requires a detailed methodology to facilitate reliable and replicable estimates, and there has been a distinct lack of re-e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01954-w |
_version_ | 1785116824413667328 |
---|---|
author | McNaughton, David Hope, Rhys Gray, Emily Xavier, Freya Beath, Alissa Jones, Michael |
author_facet | McNaughton, David Hope, Rhys Gray, Emily Xavier, Freya Beath, Alissa Jones, Michael |
author_sort | McNaughton, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: The force-matching task integrates haptic technology and electrical engineering to determine an individual’s level of sensory attenuation to somatic stimuli. The task requires a detailed methodology to facilitate reliable and replicable estimates, and there has been a distinct lack of re-evaluation of the methodological processes related to this paradigm. In this task, participants are asked to match a force delivered to their finger, either by pressing directly on their own finger with their other hand (known as the direct condition) or by controlling the device using an external potentiometer to control the force indirectly through a torque motor (known as the slider condition). We analysed 138 participants to determine 1) the optimal number of replications (2, 4, 6, or 8 replications) of the target force, 2) the optimal time window (1–1.5 s, 1.5–2 s, 2–2.5 s and 2.5–3 s) to extract the estimate of sensory attenuation, 3) if participants’ performance during the task improved, worsened or was stable across the experimental period regardless of condition, and 4) if learning effects were related to psychological traits. Results showed that the number of replications of the target forces may be reduced from 8 without compromising the estimate of sensory attenuation, the optimal time window for the extraction of the matched force is 2.5–3 s, the performance is stable over the duration of the experiment and not impacted by the measured psychological traits. In conclusion, we present a number of methodological considerations which improve the efficiency and reliability of the force-matching task. HIGHLIGHTS: • The force-matching task determines an individual’s level of sensory attenuation • The optimal number of replications of the target force may be reduced from 8 • The optimal time window to extract the matched force is 2.5–3.0 s • The estimate of sensory attenuation is stable across the duration of the task |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10556179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105561792023-10-07 Methodological considerations for the force-matching task McNaughton, David Hope, Rhys Gray, Emily Xavier, Freya Beath, Alissa Jones, Michael Behav Res Methods Article ABSTRACT: The force-matching task integrates haptic technology and electrical engineering to determine an individual’s level of sensory attenuation to somatic stimuli. The task requires a detailed methodology to facilitate reliable and replicable estimates, and there has been a distinct lack of re-evaluation of the methodological processes related to this paradigm. In this task, participants are asked to match a force delivered to their finger, either by pressing directly on their own finger with their other hand (known as the direct condition) or by controlling the device using an external potentiometer to control the force indirectly through a torque motor (known as the slider condition). We analysed 138 participants to determine 1) the optimal number of replications (2, 4, 6, or 8 replications) of the target force, 2) the optimal time window (1–1.5 s, 1.5–2 s, 2–2.5 s and 2.5–3 s) to extract the estimate of sensory attenuation, 3) if participants’ performance during the task improved, worsened or was stable across the experimental period regardless of condition, and 4) if learning effects were related to psychological traits. Results showed that the number of replications of the target forces may be reduced from 8 without compromising the estimate of sensory attenuation, the optimal time window for the extraction of the matched force is 2.5–3 s, the performance is stable over the duration of the experiment and not impacted by the measured psychological traits. In conclusion, we present a number of methodological considerations which improve the efficiency and reliability of the force-matching task. HIGHLIGHTS: • The force-matching task determines an individual’s level of sensory attenuation • The optimal number of replications of the target force may be reduced from 8 • The optimal time window to extract the matched force is 2.5–3.0 s • The estimate of sensory attenuation is stable across the duration of the task Springer US 2022-08-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10556179/ /pubmed/36002628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01954-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article McNaughton, David Hope, Rhys Gray, Emily Xavier, Freya Beath, Alissa Jones, Michael Methodological considerations for the force-matching task |
title | Methodological considerations for the force-matching task |
title_full | Methodological considerations for the force-matching task |
title_fullStr | Methodological considerations for the force-matching task |
title_full_unstemmed | Methodological considerations for the force-matching task |
title_short | Methodological considerations for the force-matching task |
title_sort | methodological considerations for the force-matching task |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01954-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcnaughtondavid methodologicalconsiderationsfortheforcematchingtask AT hoperhys methodologicalconsiderationsfortheforcematchingtask AT grayemily methodologicalconsiderationsfortheforcematchingtask AT xavierfreya methodologicalconsiderationsfortheforcematchingtask AT beathalissa methodologicalconsiderationsfortheforcematchingtask AT jonesmichael methodologicalconsiderationsfortheforcematchingtask |