Cargando…

Methodological considerations for the force-matching task

ABSTRACT: The force-matching task integrates haptic technology and electrical engineering to determine an individual’s level of sensory attenuation to somatic stimuli. The task requires a detailed methodology to facilitate reliable and replicable estimates, and there has been a distinct lack of re-e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McNaughton, David, Hope, Rhys, Gray, Emily, Xavier, Freya, Beath, Alissa, Jones, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01954-w
_version_ 1785116824413667328
author McNaughton, David
Hope, Rhys
Gray, Emily
Xavier, Freya
Beath, Alissa
Jones, Michael
author_facet McNaughton, David
Hope, Rhys
Gray, Emily
Xavier, Freya
Beath, Alissa
Jones, Michael
author_sort McNaughton, David
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: The force-matching task integrates haptic technology and electrical engineering to determine an individual’s level of sensory attenuation to somatic stimuli. The task requires a detailed methodology to facilitate reliable and replicable estimates, and there has been a distinct lack of re-evaluation of the methodological processes related to this paradigm. In this task, participants are asked to match a force delivered to their finger, either by pressing directly on their own finger with their other hand (known as the direct condition) or by controlling the device using an external potentiometer to control the force indirectly through a torque motor (known as the slider condition). We analysed 138 participants to determine 1) the optimal number of replications (2, 4, 6, or 8 replications) of the target force, 2) the optimal time window (1–1.5 s, 1.5–2 s, 2–2.5 s and 2.5–3 s) to extract the estimate of sensory attenuation, 3) if participants’ performance during the task improved, worsened or was stable across the experimental period regardless of condition, and 4) if learning effects were related to psychological traits. Results showed that the number of replications of the target forces may be reduced from 8 without compromising the estimate of sensory attenuation, the optimal time window for the extraction of the matched force is 2.5–3 s, the performance is stable over the duration of the experiment and not impacted by the measured psychological traits. In conclusion, we present a number of methodological considerations which improve the efficiency and reliability of the force-matching task. HIGHLIGHTS: • The force-matching task determines an individual’s level of sensory attenuation • The optimal number of replications of the target force may be reduced from 8 • The optimal time window to extract the matched force is 2.5–3.0 s • The estimate of sensory attenuation is stable across the duration of the task
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10556179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105561792023-10-07 Methodological considerations for the force-matching task McNaughton, David Hope, Rhys Gray, Emily Xavier, Freya Beath, Alissa Jones, Michael Behav Res Methods Article ABSTRACT: The force-matching task integrates haptic technology and electrical engineering to determine an individual’s level of sensory attenuation to somatic stimuli. The task requires a detailed methodology to facilitate reliable and replicable estimates, and there has been a distinct lack of re-evaluation of the methodological processes related to this paradigm. In this task, participants are asked to match a force delivered to their finger, either by pressing directly on their own finger with their other hand (known as the direct condition) or by controlling the device using an external potentiometer to control the force indirectly through a torque motor (known as the slider condition). We analysed 138 participants to determine 1) the optimal number of replications (2, 4, 6, or 8 replications) of the target force, 2) the optimal time window (1–1.5 s, 1.5–2 s, 2–2.5 s and 2.5–3 s) to extract the estimate of sensory attenuation, 3) if participants’ performance during the task improved, worsened or was stable across the experimental period regardless of condition, and 4) if learning effects were related to psychological traits. Results showed that the number of replications of the target forces may be reduced from 8 without compromising the estimate of sensory attenuation, the optimal time window for the extraction of the matched force is 2.5–3 s, the performance is stable over the duration of the experiment and not impacted by the measured psychological traits. In conclusion, we present a number of methodological considerations which improve the efficiency and reliability of the force-matching task. HIGHLIGHTS: • The force-matching task determines an individual’s level of sensory attenuation • The optimal number of replications of the target force may be reduced from 8 • The optimal time window to extract the matched force is 2.5–3.0 s • The estimate of sensory attenuation is stable across the duration of the task Springer US 2022-08-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10556179/ /pubmed/36002628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01954-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
McNaughton, David
Hope, Rhys
Gray, Emily
Xavier, Freya
Beath, Alissa
Jones, Michael
Methodological considerations for the force-matching task
title Methodological considerations for the force-matching task
title_full Methodological considerations for the force-matching task
title_fullStr Methodological considerations for the force-matching task
title_full_unstemmed Methodological considerations for the force-matching task
title_short Methodological considerations for the force-matching task
title_sort methodological considerations for the force-matching task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01954-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mcnaughtondavid methodologicalconsiderationsfortheforcematchingtask
AT hoperhys methodologicalconsiderationsfortheforcematchingtask
AT grayemily methodologicalconsiderationsfortheforcematchingtask
AT xavierfreya methodologicalconsiderationsfortheforcematchingtask
AT beathalissa methodologicalconsiderationsfortheforcematchingtask
AT jonesmichael methodologicalconsiderationsfortheforcematchingtask