Cargando…

Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets

Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) imaging can provide comprehensive quantitative and spatial information for multiple immune markers for tumour immunoprofiling. However, application at scale to clinical trial samples sourced from multiple institutions is challenging due to pre‐analytical heterogene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frei, Anja L, McGuigan, Anthony, Sinha, Ritik RAK, Glaire, Mark A, Jabbar, Faiz, Gneo, Luciana, Tomasevic, Tijana, Harkin, Andrea, Iveson, Tim J, Saunders, Mark, Oein, Karin, Maka, Noori, Pezella, Francesco, Campo, Leticia, Hay, Jennifer, Edwards, Joanne, Sansom, Owen J, Kelly, Caroline, Tomlinson, Ian, Kildal, Wanja, Kerr, Rachel S, Kerr, David J, Danielsen, Håvard E, Domingo, Enric, Church, David N, Koelzer, Viktor H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37697694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.342
_version_ 1785116839349583872
author Frei, Anja L
McGuigan, Anthony
Sinha, Ritik RAK
Glaire, Mark A
Jabbar, Faiz
Gneo, Luciana
Tomasevic, Tijana
Harkin, Andrea
Iveson, Tim J
Saunders, Mark
Oein, Karin
Maka, Noori
Pezella, Francesco
Campo, Leticia
Hay, Jennifer
Edwards, Joanne
Sansom, Owen J
Kelly, Caroline
Tomlinson, Ian
Kildal, Wanja
Kerr, Rachel S
Kerr, David J
Danielsen, Håvard E
Domingo, Enric
Church, David N
Koelzer, Viktor H
author_facet Frei, Anja L
McGuigan, Anthony
Sinha, Ritik RAK
Glaire, Mark A
Jabbar, Faiz
Gneo, Luciana
Tomasevic, Tijana
Harkin, Andrea
Iveson, Tim J
Saunders, Mark
Oein, Karin
Maka, Noori
Pezella, Francesco
Campo, Leticia
Hay, Jennifer
Edwards, Joanne
Sansom, Owen J
Kelly, Caroline
Tomlinson, Ian
Kildal, Wanja
Kerr, Rachel S
Kerr, David J
Danielsen, Håvard E
Domingo, Enric
Church, David N
Koelzer, Viktor H
author_sort Frei, Anja L
collection PubMed
description Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) imaging can provide comprehensive quantitative and spatial information for multiple immune markers for tumour immunoprofiling. However, application at scale to clinical trial samples sourced from multiple institutions is challenging due to pre‐analytical heterogeneity. This study reports an analytical approach to the largest multi‐parameter immunoprofiling study of clinical trial samples to date. We analysed 12,592 tissue microarray (TMA) spots from 3,545 colorectal cancers sourced from more than 240 institutions in two clinical trials (QUASAR 2 and SCOT) stained for CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, FoxP3, pan‐cytokeratin, and DAPI by mIF. TMA slides were multi‐spectrally imaged and analysed by cell‐based and pixel‐based marker analysis. We developed an adaptive thresholding method to account for inter‐ and intra‐slide intensity variation in TMA analysis. Applying this method effectively ameliorated inter‐ and intra‐slide intensity variation improving the image analysis results compared with methods using a single global threshold. Correlation of CD8 data derived by our mIF analysis approach with single‐plex chromogenic immunohistochemistry CD8 data derived from subsequent sections indicates the validity of our method (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients ρ between 0.63 and 0.66, p ≪ 0.01) as compared with the current gold standard analysis approach. Evaluation of correlation between cell‐based and pixel‐based analysis results confirms equivalency (ρ > 0.8, p ≪ 0.01, except for CD20 in the epithelial region) of both analytical approaches. These data suggest that our adaptive thresholding approach can enable analysis of mIF‐stained clinical trial TMA datasets by digital pathology at scale for precision immunoprofiling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10556275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105562752023-10-07 Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets Frei, Anja L McGuigan, Anthony Sinha, Ritik RAK Glaire, Mark A Jabbar, Faiz Gneo, Luciana Tomasevic, Tijana Harkin, Andrea Iveson, Tim J Saunders, Mark Oein, Karin Maka, Noori Pezella, Francesco Campo, Leticia Hay, Jennifer Edwards, Joanne Sansom, Owen J Kelly, Caroline Tomlinson, Ian Kildal, Wanja Kerr, Rachel S Kerr, David J Danielsen, Håvard E Domingo, Enric Church, David N Koelzer, Viktor H J Pathol Clin Res Original Articles Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) imaging can provide comprehensive quantitative and spatial information for multiple immune markers for tumour immunoprofiling. However, application at scale to clinical trial samples sourced from multiple institutions is challenging due to pre‐analytical heterogeneity. This study reports an analytical approach to the largest multi‐parameter immunoprofiling study of clinical trial samples to date. We analysed 12,592 tissue microarray (TMA) spots from 3,545 colorectal cancers sourced from more than 240 institutions in two clinical trials (QUASAR 2 and SCOT) stained for CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, FoxP3, pan‐cytokeratin, and DAPI by mIF. TMA slides were multi‐spectrally imaged and analysed by cell‐based and pixel‐based marker analysis. We developed an adaptive thresholding method to account for inter‐ and intra‐slide intensity variation in TMA analysis. Applying this method effectively ameliorated inter‐ and intra‐slide intensity variation improving the image analysis results compared with methods using a single global threshold. Correlation of CD8 data derived by our mIF analysis approach with single‐plex chromogenic immunohistochemistry CD8 data derived from subsequent sections indicates the validity of our method (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients ρ between 0.63 and 0.66, p ≪ 0.01) as compared with the current gold standard analysis approach. Evaluation of correlation between cell‐based and pixel‐based analysis results confirms equivalency (ρ > 0.8, p ≪ 0.01, except for CD20 in the epithelial region) of both analytical approaches. These data suggest that our adaptive thresholding approach can enable analysis of mIF‐stained clinical trial TMA datasets by digital pathology at scale for precision immunoprofiling. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10556275/ /pubmed/37697694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.342 Text en © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Frei, Anja L
McGuigan, Anthony
Sinha, Ritik RAK
Glaire, Mark A
Jabbar, Faiz
Gneo, Luciana
Tomasevic, Tijana
Harkin, Andrea
Iveson, Tim J
Saunders, Mark
Oein, Karin
Maka, Noori
Pezella, Francesco
Campo, Leticia
Hay, Jennifer
Edwards, Joanne
Sansom, Owen J
Kelly, Caroline
Tomlinson, Ian
Kildal, Wanja
Kerr, Rachel S
Kerr, David J
Danielsen, Håvard E
Domingo, Enric
Church, David N
Koelzer, Viktor H
Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets
title Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets
title_full Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets
title_fullStr Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets
title_full_unstemmed Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets
title_short Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets
title_sort accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37697694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.342
work_keys_str_mv AT freianjal accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT mcguigananthony accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT sinharitikrak accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT glairemarka accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT jabbarfaiz accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT gneoluciana accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT tomasevictijana accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT harkinandrea accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT ivesontimj accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT saundersmark accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT oeinkarin accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT makanoori accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT pezellafrancesco accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT campoleticia accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT hayjennifer accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT edwardsjoanne accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT sansomowenj accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT kellycaroline accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT tomlinsonian accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT kildalwanja accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT kerrrachels accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT kerrdavidj accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT danielsenhavarde accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT domingoenric accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT churchdavidn accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets
AT koelzerviktorh accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets