Cargando…
Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets
Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) imaging can provide comprehensive quantitative and spatial information for multiple immune markers for tumour immunoprofiling. However, application at scale to clinical trial samples sourced from multiple institutions is challenging due to pre‐analytical heterogene...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37697694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.342 |
_version_ | 1785116839349583872 |
---|---|
author | Frei, Anja L McGuigan, Anthony Sinha, Ritik RAK Glaire, Mark A Jabbar, Faiz Gneo, Luciana Tomasevic, Tijana Harkin, Andrea Iveson, Tim J Saunders, Mark Oein, Karin Maka, Noori Pezella, Francesco Campo, Leticia Hay, Jennifer Edwards, Joanne Sansom, Owen J Kelly, Caroline Tomlinson, Ian Kildal, Wanja Kerr, Rachel S Kerr, David J Danielsen, Håvard E Domingo, Enric Church, David N Koelzer, Viktor H |
author_facet | Frei, Anja L McGuigan, Anthony Sinha, Ritik RAK Glaire, Mark A Jabbar, Faiz Gneo, Luciana Tomasevic, Tijana Harkin, Andrea Iveson, Tim J Saunders, Mark Oein, Karin Maka, Noori Pezella, Francesco Campo, Leticia Hay, Jennifer Edwards, Joanne Sansom, Owen J Kelly, Caroline Tomlinson, Ian Kildal, Wanja Kerr, Rachel S Kerr, David J Danielsen, Håvard E Domingo, Enric Church, David N Koelzer, Viktor H |
author_sort | Frei, Anja L |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) imaging can provide comprehensive quantitative and spatial information for multiple immune markers for tumour immunoprofiling. However, application at scale to clinical trial samples sourced from multiple institutions is challenging due to pre‐analytical heterogeneity. This study reports an analytical approach to the largest multi‐parameter immunoprofiling study of clinical trial samples to date. We analysed 12,592 tissue microarray (TMA) spots from 3,545 colorectal cancers sourced from more than 240 institutions in two clinical trials (QUASAR 2 and SCOT) stained for CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, FoxP3, pan‐cytokeratin, and DAPI by mIF. TMA slides were multi‐spectrally imaged and analysed by cell‐based and pixel‐based marker analysis. We developed an adaptive thresholding method to account for inter‐ and intra‐slide intensity variation in TMA analysis. Applying this method effectively ameliorated inter‐ and intra‐slide intensity variation improving the image analysis results compared with methods using a single global threshold. Correlation of CD8 data derived by our mIF analysis approach with single‐plex chromogenic immunohistochemistry CD8 data derived from subsequent sections indicates the validity of our method (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients ρ between 0.63 and 0.66, p ≪ 0.01) as compared with the current gold standard analysis approach. Evaluation of correlation between cell‐based and pixel‐based analysis results confirms equivalency (ρ > 0.8, p ≪ 0.01, except for CD20 in the epithelial region) of both analytical approaches. These data suggest that our adaptive thresholding approach can enable analysis of mIF‐stained clinical trial TMA datasets by digital pathology at scale for precision immunoprofiling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10556275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105562752023-10-07 Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets Frei, Anja L McGuigan, Anthony Sinha, Ritik RAK Glaire, Mark A Jabbar, Faiz Gneo, Luciana Tomasevic, Tijana Harkin, Andrea Iveson, Tim J Saunders, Mark Oein, Karin Maka, Noori Pezella, Francesco Campo, Leticia Hay, Jennifer Edwards, Joanne Sansom, Owen J Kelly, Caroline Tomlinson, Ian Kildal, Wanja Kerr, Rachel S Kerr, David J Danielsen, Håvard E Domingo, Enric Church, David N Koelzer, Viktor H J Pathol Clin Res Original Articles Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) imaging can provide comprehensive quantitative and spatial information for multiple immune markers for tumour immunoprofiling. However, application at scale to clinical trial samples sourced from multiple institutions is challenging due to pre‐analytical heterogeneity. This study reports an analytical approach to the largest multi‐parameter immunoprofiling study of clinical trial samples to date. We analysed 12,592 tissue microarray (TMA) spots from 3,545 colorectal cancers sourced from more than 240 institutions in two clinical trials (QUASAR 2 and SCOT) stained for CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, FoxP3, pan‐cytokeratin, and DAPI by mIF. TMA slides were multi‐spectrally imaged and analysed by cell‐based and pixel‐based marker analysis. We developed an adaptive thresholding method to account for inter‐ and intra‐slide intensity variation in TMA analysis. Applying this method effectively ameliorated inter‐ and intra‐slide intensity variation improving the image analysis results compared with methods using a single global threshold. Correlation of CD8 data derived by our mIF analysis approach with single‐plex chromogenic immunohistochemistry CD8 data derived from subsequent sections indicates the validity of our method (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients ρ between 0.63 and 0.66, p ≪ 0.01) as compared with the current gold standard analysis approach. Evaluation of correlation between cell‐based and pixel‐based analysis results confirms equivalency (ρ > 0.8, p ≪ 0.01, except for CD20 in the epithelial region) of both analytical approaches. These data suggest that our adaptive thresholding approach can enable analysis of mIF‐stained clinical trial TMA datasets by digital pathology at scale for precision immunoprofiling. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10556275/ /pubmed/37697694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.342 Text en © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Frei, Anja L McGuigan, Anthony Sinha, Ritik RAK Glaire, Mark A Jabbar, Faiz Gneo, Luciana Tomasevic, Tijana Harkin, Andrea Iveson, Tim J Saunders, Mark Oein, Karin Maka, Noori Pezella, Francesco Campo, Leticia Hay, Jennifer Edwards, Joanne Sansom, Owen J Kelly, Caroline Tomlinson, Ian Kildal, Wanja Kerr, Rachel S Kerr, David J Danielsen, Håvard E Domingo, Enric Church, David N Koelzer, Viktor H Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets |
title | Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets |
title_full | Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets |
title_fullStr | Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets |
title_full_unstemmed | Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets |
title_short | Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets |
title_sort | accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large‐scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37697694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.342 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freianjal accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT mcguigananthony accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT sinharitikrak accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT glairemarka accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT jabbarfaiz accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT gneoluciana accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT tomasevictijana accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT harkinandrea accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT ivesontimj accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT saundersmark accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT oeinkarin accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT makanoori accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT pezellafrancesco accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT campoleticia accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT hayjennifer accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT edwardsjoanne accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT sansomowenj accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT kellycaroline accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT tomlinsonian accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT kildalwanja accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT kerrrachels accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT kerrdavidj accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT danielsenhavarde accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT domingoenric accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT churchdavidn accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets AT koelzerviktorh accountingforintensityvariationinimageanalysisoflargescalemultiplexedclinicaltrialdatasets |