Cargando…

치료냐 예방이냐? 결핵 퇴치 운동의 우선권 논의: 20세기 전환기 프랑스를 중심으로(†)

The purpose of this paper is to analyze discussions on the matter of priority in treatment and prevention that took place in the medical community, the government and social hygiene associations to tuberculosis referred to as one of the national calamity in France at the turn of the 20th century. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for the History of Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746408
http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2022.31.691
_version_ 1785116856931057664
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this paper is to analyze discussions on the matter of priority in treatment and prevention that took place in the medical community, the government and social hygiene associations to tuberculosis referred to as one of the national calamity in France at the turn of the 20th century. In other words, it is to show that treatment and prevention have complementary properties in France’s anti-tuberculosis movement, considering the discussions on which institutions should preferably be expanded - between the Sanatorium that values medical treatment and the anti-tuberculosis dispensary that values social prevention. Tuberculosis, which is known to have existed from the ancient times, spread to the era of industrialization and urbanization, resulting in a large loss of lives in the second half of the 19th century following cholera in the first half of the century. Starting in Germany in the middle of this century, Sanatorium established a treatment for tuberculosis patients with air therapy, proper exercise or rest, and diet. In France, a public Sanatorium was built for the lower class, not like a luxury resort style Sanatorium for the wealthy class, from the 1890s. The spread was slow, however, due to financial problems. In the 1900s, anti-tuberculosis dispensary as a health center were increasingly built in working class quarters. The debate over whether to support the sanatorium or the dispensary was ignited at first, but since the mid-to-late 1900s, the two institutions’ roles, namely, medical treatment and social prevention, have been recognized as complementary. The Anti-tuberculosis dispensary Act of 1916 and the Sanatorium Act of 1919 systematically supported the complementary relationship between treatment and prevention in fighting against tuberculosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10556351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Society for the History of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105563512023-11-07 치료냐 예방이냐? 결핵 퇴치 운동의 우선권 논의: 20세기 전환기 프랑스를 중심으로(†) Uisahak Article The purpose of this paper is to analyze discussions on the matter of priority in treatment and prevention that took place in the medical community, the government and social hygiene associations to tuberculosis referred to as one of the national calamity in France at the turn of the 20th century. In other words, it is to show that treatment and prevention have complementary properties in France’s anti-tuberculosis movement, considering the discussions on which institutions should preferably be expanded - between the Sanatorium that values medical treatment and the anti-tuberculosis dispensary that values social prevention. Tuberculosis, which is known to have existed from the ancient times, spread to the era of industrialization and urbanization, resulting in a large loss of lives in the second half of the 19th century following cholera in the first half of the century. Starting in Germany in the middle of this century, Sanatorium established a treatment for tuberculosis patients with air therapy, proper exercise or rest, and diet. In France, a public Sanatorium was built for the lower class, not like a luxury resort style Sanatorium for the wealthy class, from the 1890s. The spread was slow, however, due to financial problems. In the 1900s, anti-tuberculosis dispensary as a health center were increasingly built in working class quarters. The debate over whether to support the sanatorium or the dispensary was ignited at first, but since the mid-to-late 1900s, the two institutions’ roles, namely, medical treatment and social prevention, have been recognized as complementary. The Anti-tuberculosis dispensary Act of 1916 and the Sanatorium Act of 1919 systematically supported the complementary relationship between treatment and prevention in fighting against tuberculosis. The Korean Society for the History of Medicine 2022-12 2022-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10556351/ /pubmed/36746408 http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2022.31.691 Text en © 대한의사학회 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
치료냐 예방이냐? 결핵 퇴치 운동의 우선권 논의: 20세기 전환기 프랑스를 중심으로(†)
title 치료냐 예방이냐? 결핵 퇴치 운동의 우선권 논의: 20세기 전환기 프랑스를 중심으로(†)
title_full 치료냐 예방이냐? 결핵 퇴치 운동의 우선권 논의: 20세기 전환기 프랑스를 중심으로(†)
title_fullStr 치료냐 예방이냐? 결핵 퇴치 운동의 우선권 논의: 20세기 전환기 프랑스를 중심으로(†)
title_full_unstemmed 치료냐 예방이냐? 결핵 퇴치 운동의 우선권 논의: 20세기 전환기 프랑스를 중심으로(†)
title_short 치료냐 예방이냐? 결핵 퇴치 운동의 우선권 논의: 20세기 전환기 프랑스를 중심으로(†)
title_sort 치료냐 예방이냐? 결핵 퇴치 운동의 우선권 논의: 20세기 전환기 프랑스를 중심으로(†)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746408
http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2022.31.691
work_keys_str_mv AT chilyonyayebanginyagyeolhaegtoechiundonguiuseongwonnonui20segijeonhwangipeulangseuleuljungsimeulo