Cargando…
Morphological and transcriptomic responses/acclimations of erect‐type submerged macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata both at low‐light exposure and light recovery phases
Light intensity is a determinant for submerged macrophytes. Little is known about their molecular responses to low‐light exposure, despite more informative and responsive than morphological traits. For erect‐type submerged macrophytes, the stem is more crucial relative to the leaf in acclimation to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37809356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10583 |
_version_ | 1785116895927599104 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Qingchun Gao, Yuxuan Song, Chao Zhang, Xinhou Wang, Guoxiang |
author_facet | Guo, Qingchun Gao, Yuxuan Song, Chao Zhang, Xinhou Wang, Guoxiang |
author_sort | Guo, Qingchun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Light intensity is a determinant for submerged macrophytes. Little is known about their molecular responses to low‐light exposure, despite more informative and responsive than morphological traits. For erect‐type submerged macrophytes, the stem is more crucial relative to the leaf in acclimation to low‐light stress, but receives less attention. We determined morphological and stem transcriptomic responses/acclimations of Hydrilla verticillata to extremely and mildly low light (7.2 and 36 μmol photons m(−2) s(−1), respectively), that is, EL and ML, with the radiation intensity of 180 μmol photons m(−2) s(−1) as the control. Low‐light exposure continued for 9 days, followed by a 7‐day recovery phase (180 μmol photons m(−2) s(−1)). At the exposure phase, the low‐light treatments, in particular the EL, decreased the relative growth ratio, but induced greater height and longer stem internode distance and epidermal cell. Such responses/acclimations continued into the recovery phase, despite more or less changes in the magnitude. Transcriptome showed that the photosynthetic system was inhibited at the exposure phase, but the macrophyte adjusted hormone synthesis relating to cell division and elongation. Moreover, the EL activated cell stress responses such as DNA repair. Following light recovery, the macrophyte exhibited a strong‐light response, although energy metabolism enhanced. Especially, the EL enriched the pathways relating to anthocyanin synthesis at such phase, indicating an activation of photoprotective mechanism. Our findings suggest that negative influences of low light occur at both low‐light exposure and recovery phases, but submerged macrophytes would acclimate to light environments. Transcriptome can show molecular basis of plant responses/acclimations, including but not limited to morphology. This study establishes a bridge connecting morphological and molecular responses/acclimations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10556543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105565432023-10-07 Morphological and transcriptomic responses/acclimations of erect‐type submerged macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata both at low‐light exposure and light recovery phases Guo, Qingchun Gao, Yuxuan Song, Chao Zhang, Xinhou Wang, Guoxiang Ecol Evol Research Articles Light intensity is a determinant for submerged macrophytes. Little is known about their molecular responses to low‐light exposure, despite more informative and responsive than morphological traits. For erect‐type submerged macrophytes, the stem is more crucial relative to the leaf in acclimation to low‐light stress, but receives less attention. We determined morphological and stem transcriptomic responses/acclimations of Hydrilla verticillata to extremely and mildly low light (7.2 and 36 μmol photons m(−2) s(−1), respectively), that is, EL and ML, with the radiation intensity of 180 μmol photons m(−2) s(−1) as the control. Low‐light exposure continued for 9 days, followed by a 7‐day recovery phase (180 μmol photons m(−2) s(−1)). At the exposure phase, the low‐light treatments, in particular the EL, decreased the relative growth ratio, but induced greater height and longer stem internode distance and epidermal cell. Such responses/acclimations continued into the recovery phase, despite more or less changes in the magnitude. Transcriptome showed that the photosynthetic system was inhibited at the exposure phase, but the macrophyte adjusted hormone synthesis relating to cell division and elongation. Moreover, the EL activated cell stress responses such as DNA repair. Following light recovery, the macrophyte exhibited a strong‐light response, although energy metabolism enhanced. Especially, the EL enriched the pathways relating to anthocyanin synthesis at such phase, indicating an activation of photoprotective mechanism. Our findings suggest that negative influences of low light occur at both low‐light exposure and recovery phases, but submerged macrophytes would acclimate to light environments. Transcriptome can show molecular basis of plant responses/acclimations, including but not limited to morphology. This study establishes a bridge connecting morphological and molecular responses/acclimations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10556543/ /pubmed/37809356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10583 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Guo, Qingchun Gao, Yuxuan Song, Chao Zhang, Xinhou Wang, Guoxiang Morphological and transcriptomic responses/acclimations of erect‐type submerged macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata both at low‐light exposure and light recovery phases |
title | Morphological and transcriptomic responses/acclimations of erect‐type submerged macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata both at low‐light exposure and light recovery phases |
title_full | Morphological and transcriptomic responses/acclimations of erect‐type submerged macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata both at low‐light exposure and light recovery phases |
title_fullStr | Morphological and transcriptomic responses/acclimations of erect‐type submerged macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata both at low‐light exposure and light recovery phases |
title_full_unstemmed | Morphological and transcriptomic responses/acclimations of erect‐type submerged macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata both at low‐light exposure and light recovery phases |
title_short | Morphological and transcriptomic responses/acclimations of erect‐type submerged macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata both at low‐light exposure and light recovery phases |
title_sort | morphological and transcriptomic responses/acclimations of erect‐type submerged macrophyte hydrilla verticillata both at low‐light exposure and light recovery phases |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37809356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10583 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guoqingchun morphologicalandtranscriptomicresponsesacclimationsoferecttypesubmergedmacrophytehydrillaverticillatabothatlowlightexposureandlightrecoveryphases AT gaoyuxuan morphologicalandtranscriptomicresponsesacclimationsoferecttypesubmergedmacrophytehydrillaverticillatabothatlowlightexposureandlightrecoveryphases AT songchao morphologicalandtranscriptomicresponsesacclimationsoferecttypesubmergedmacrophytehydrillaverticillatabothatlowlightexposureandlightrecoveryphases AT zhangxinhou morphologicalandtranscriptomicresponsesacclimationsoferecttypesubmergedmacrophytehydrillaverticillatabothatlowlightexposureandlightrecoveryphases AT wangguoxiang morphologicalandtranscriptomicresponsesacclimationsoferecttypesubmergedmacrophytehydrillaverticillatabothatlowlightexposureandlightrecoveryphases |