Cargando…
Bioprosthetic versus mechanical tricuspid valve replacement: Biological age is not the same as chronological age
Autores principales: | Van den Eynde, Jef, Schuermans, Art |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37808029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2023.03.008 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The concept of cone creation to treat isolated tricuspid valve dysplasia and the case of a double-orifice tricuspid valve
por: Quarti, Andrea Giulio, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Management of severe tricuspid valve regurgitation due to ruptured papillary muscle in a patient with mediastinitis early after heart transplant
por: Schumer, Erin M., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Outcome of consistent guideline-based tricuspid management in patients undergoing degenerative mitral regurgitation correction
por: Dreyfus, Gilles D., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Tricuspid valve replacement provides better long-term survival and tricuspid valve function than repair in patients with systemic right ventricle
por: Furuta, Akihisa, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Mechanical tricuspid valve replacement in hypoplastic left heart syndrome: An institutional experience
por: Hoda, Mehar, et al.
Publicado: (2022)