Cargando…
Machine learning approaches in microbiome research: challenges and best practices
Microbiome data predictive analysis within a machine learning (ML) workflow presents numerous domain-specific challenges involving preprocessing, feature selection, predictive modeling, performance estimation, model interpretation, and the extraction of biological information from the results. To as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37808286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1261889 |
_version_ | 1785116961538048000 |
---|---|
author | Papoutsoglou, Georgios Tarazona, Sonia Lopes, Marta B. Klammsteiner, Thomas Ibrahimi, Eliana Eckenberger, Julia Novielli, Pierfrancesco Tonda, Alberto Simeon, Andrea Shigdel, Rajesh Béreux, Stéphane Vitali, Giacomo Tangaro, Sabina Lahti, Leo Temko, Andriy Claesson, Marcus J. Berland, Magali |
author_facet | Papoutsoglou, Georgios Tarazona, Sonia Lopes, Marta B. Klammsteiner, Thomas Ibrahimi, Eliana Eckenberger, Julia Novielli, Pierfrancesco Tonda, Alberto Simeon, Andrea Shigdel, Rajesh Béreux, Stéphane Vitali, Giacomo Tangaro, Sabina Lahti, Leo Temko, Andriy Claesson, Marcus J. Berland, Magali |
author_sort | Papoutsoglou, Georgios |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microbiome data predictive analysis within a machine learning (ML) workflow presents numerous domain-specific challenges involving preprocessing, feature selection, predictive modeling, performance estimation, model interpretation, and the extraction of biological information from the results. To assist decision-making, we offer a set of recommendations on algorithm selection, pipeline creation and evaluation, stemming from the COST Action ML4Microbiome. We compared the suggested approaches on a multi-cohort shotgun metagenomics dataset of colorectal cancer patients, focusing on their performance in disease diagnosis and biomarker discovery. It is demonstrated that the use of compositional transformations and filtering methods as part of data preprocessing does not always improve the predictive performance of a model. In contrast, the multivariate feature selection, such as the Statistically Equivalent Signatures algorithm, was effective in reducing the classification error. When validated on a separate test dataset, this algorithm in combination with random forest modeling, provided the most accurate performance estimates. Lastly, we showed how linear modeling by logistic regression coupled with visualization techniques such as Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE) plots can yield interpretable results and offer biological insights. These findings are significant for clinicians and non-experts alike in translational applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10556866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105568662023-10-07 Machine learning approaches in microbiome research: challenges and best practices Papoutsoglou, Georgios Tarazona, Sonia Lopes, Marta B. Klammsteiner, Thomas Ibrahimi, Eliana Eckenberger, Julia Novielli, Pierfrancesco Tonda, Alberto Simeon, Andrea Shigdel, Rajesh Béreux, Stéphane Vitali, Giacomo Tangaro, Sabina Lahti, Leo Temko, Andriy Claesson, Marcus J. Berland, Magali Front Microbiol Microbiology Microbiome data predictive analysis within a machine learning (ML) workflow presents numerous domain-specific challenges involving preprocessing, feature selection, predictive modeling, performance estimation, model interpretation, and the extraction of biological information from the results. To assist decision-making, we offer a set of recommendations on algorithm selection, pipeline creation and evaluation, stemming from the COST Action ML4Microbiome. We compared the suggested approaches on a multi-cohort shotgun metagenomics dataset of colorectal cancer patients, focusing on their performance in disease diagnosis and biomarker discovery. It is demonstrated that the use of compositional transformations and filtering methods as part of data preprocessing does not always improve the predictive performance of a model. In contrast, the multivariate feature selection, such as the Statistically Equivalent Signatures algorithm, was effective in reducing the classification error. When validated on a separate test dataset, this algorithm in combination with random forest modeling, provided the most accurate performance estimates. Lastly, we showed how linear modeling by logistic regression coupled with visualization techniques such as Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE) plots can yield interpretable results and offer biological insights. These findings are significant for clinicians and non-experts alike in translational applications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10556866/ /pubmed/37808286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1261889 Text en Copyright © 2023 Papoutsoglou, Tarazona, Lopes, Klammsteiner, Ibrahimi, Eckenberger, Novielli, Tonda, Simeon, Shigdel, Béreux, Vitali, Tangaro, Lahti, Temko, Claesson and Berland. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Papoutsoglou, Georgios Tarazona, Sonia Lopes, Marta B. Klammsteiner, Thomas Ibrahimi, Eliana Eckenberger, Julia Novielli, Pierfrancesco Tonda, Alberto Simeon, Andrea Shigdel, Rajesh Béreux, Stéphane Vitali, Giacomo Tangaro, Sabina Lahti, Leo Temko, Andriy Claesson, Marcus J. Berland, Magali Machine learning approaches in microbiome research: challenges and best practices |
title | Machine learning approaches in microbiome research: challenges and best practices |
title_full | Machine learning approaches in microbiome research: challenges and best practices |
title_fullStr | Machine learning approaches in microbiome research: challenges and best practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning approaches in microbiome research: challenges and best practices |
title_short | Machine learning approaches in microbiome research: challenges and best practices |
title_sort | machine learning approaches in microbiome research: challenges and best practices |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37808286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1261889 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papoutsoglougeorgios machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT tarazonasonia machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT lopesmartab machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT klammsteinerthomas machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT ibrahimieliana machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT eckenbergerjulia machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT noviellipierfrancesco machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT tondaalberto machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT simeonandrea machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT shigdelrajesh machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT bereuxstephane machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT vitaligiacomo machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT tangarosabina machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT lahtileo machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT temkoandriy machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT claessonmarcusj machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices AT berlandmagali machinelearningapproachesinmicrobiomeresearchchallengesandbestpractices |