Cargando…

Impact of Navigation on 30-Day Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVE: Navigation has been increasingly used to treat degenerative disease, with positive radiographic and clinical outcomes and fewer adverse events and reoperations, despite increased operative time. However, short-term analysis on treating adult spi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katz, Austen D., Galina, Jesse, Song, Junho, Hasan, Sayyida, Perfetti, Dean, Virk, Sohrab, Silber, Jeff, Essig, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34569338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211047551
_version_ 1785116967889272832
author Katz, Austen D.
Galina, Jesse
Song, Junho
Hasan, Sayyida
Perfetti, Dean
Virk, Sohrab
Silber, Jeff
Essig, David
author_facet Katz, Austen D.
Galina, Jesse
Song, Junho
Hasan, Sayyida
Perfetti, Dean
Virk, Sohrab
Silber, Jeff
Essig, David
author_sort Katz, Austen D.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVE: Navigation has been increasingly used to treat degenerative disease, with positive radiographic and clinical outcomes and fewer adverse events and reoperations, despite increased operative time. However, short-term analysis on treating adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery with navigation is limited, particularly using large nationally represented cohorts. This is the first large-scale database study to compare 30-day readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and value-per-operative time for navigated and conventional ASD surgery. METHODS: Adults were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Multivariate regression was used to compare outcomes between navigated and conventional surgery and to control for predictors and baseline differences. RESULTS: 3190 ASD patients were included. Navigated and conventional patients were similar. Navigated cases had greater operative time (405 vs 320 min) and mean RVUs per case (81.3 vs 69.7), and had more supplementary pelvic fixations (26.1 vs 13.4%) and osteotomies (50.3 vs 27.7%) (P <.001). In univariate analysis, navigation had greater reoperation (9.9 vs 5.2%, P = .011), morbidity (57.8 vs 46.8%, P = .007), and transfusion (52.2 vs 41.8%, P = .010) rates. Readmission was similar (11.9 vs 8.4%). In multivariate analysis, navigation predicted reoperation (OR = 1.792, P = .048), but no longer predicted morbidity or transfusion. Most reoperations were infectious and hardware-related. CONCLUSIONS: Despite controlling for patient-related and procedural factors, navigation independently predicted a 79% increased odds of reoperation but did not predict morbidity or transfusion. Readmission was similar between groups. This is explained, in part, by greater operative time and transfusion, which are risk factors for infection. Reoperation most frequently occurred for wound- and hardware-related reasons, suggesting navigation carries an increased risk of infectious-related events beyond increased operative time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10556894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105568942023-10-07 Impact of Navigation on 30-Day Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Katz, Austen D. Galina, Jesse Song, Junho Hasan, Sayyida Perfetti, Dean Virk, Sohrab Silber, Jeff Essig, David Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVE: Navigation has been increasingly used to treat degenerative disease, with positive radiographic and clinical outcomes and fewer adverse events and reoperations, despite increased operative time. However, short-term analysis on treating adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery with navigation is limited, particularly using large nationally represented cohorts. This is the first large-scale database study to compare 30-day readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and value-per-operative time for navigated and conventional ASD surgery. METHODS: Adults were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Multivariate regression was used to compare outcomes between navigated and conventional surgery and to control for predictors and baseline differences. RESULTS: 3190 ASD patients were included. Navigated and conventional patients were similar. Navigated cases had greater operative time (405 vs 320 min) and mean RVUs per case (81.3 vs 69.7), and had more supplementary pelvic fixations (26.1 vs 13.4%) and osteotomies (50.3 vs 27.7%) (P <.001). In univariate analysis, navigation had greater reoperation (9.9 vs 5.2%, P = .011), morbidity (57.8 vs 46.8%, P = .007), and transfusion (52.2 vs 41.8%, P = .010) rates. Readmission was similar (11.9 vs 8.4%). In multivariate analysis, navigation predicted reoperation (OR = 1.792, P = .048), but no longer predicted morbidity or transfusion. Most reoperations were infectious and hardware-related. CONCLUSIONS: Despite controlling for patient-related and procedural factors, navigation independently predicted a 79% increased odds of reoperation but did not predict morbidity or transfusion. Readmission was similar between groups. This is explained, in part, by greater operative time and transfusion, which are risk factors for infection. Reoperation most frequently occurred for wound- and hardware-related reasons, suggesting navigation carries an increased risk of infectious-related events beyond increased operative time. SAGE Publications 2021-09-25 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10556894/ /pubmed/34569338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211047551 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Katz, Austen D.
Galina, Jesse
Song, Junho
Hasan, Sayyida
Perfetti, Dean
Virk, Sohrab
Silber, Jeff
Essig, David
Impact of Navigation on 30-Day Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
title Impact of Navigation on 30-Day Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
title_full Impact of Navigation on 30-Day Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
title_fullStr Impact of Navigation on 30-Day Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Navigation on 30-Day Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
title_short Impact of Navigation on 30-Day Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
title_sort impact of navigation on 30-day outcomes for adult spinal deformity surgery
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34569338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211047551
work_keys_str_mv AT katzaustend impactofnavigationon30dayoutcomesforadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT galinajesse impactofnavigationon30dayoutcomesforadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT songjunho impactofnavigationon30dayoutcomesforadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT hasansayyida impactofnavigationon30dayoutcomesforadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT perfettidean impactofnavigationon30dayoutcomesforadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT virksohrab impactofnavigationon30dayoutcomesforadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT silberjeff impactofnavigationon30dayoutcomesforadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT essigdavid impactofnavigationon30dayoutcomesforadultspinaldeformitysurgery