Cargando…

Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVES: With increased awareness of the opioid crisis in spine surgery, the focus postoperatively has shifted to managing surgical site pain while minimizing opioid use. Numerous studies have compared outcomes and fusion status of different interbody fusion te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LeRoy, Taryn E., Moon, Andrew, Chilton, Matthew, Gedman, Marissa, Aidlen, Jessica P., Rogerson, Ashley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34920687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211067747
_version_ 1785116968355889152
author LeRoy, Taryn E.
Moon, Andrew
Chilton, Matthew
Gedman, Marissa
Aidlen, Jessica P.
Rogerson, Ashley
author_facet LeRoy, Taryn E.
Moon, Andrew
Chilton, Matthew
Gedman, Marissa
Aidlen, Jessica P.
Rogerson, Ashley
author_sort LeRoy, Taryn E.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVES: With increased awareness of the opioid crisis in spine surgery, the focus postoperatively has shifted to managing surgical site pain while minimizing opioid use. Numerous studies have compared outcomes and fusion status of different interbody fusion techniques; however, there is limited literature evaluating opioid consumption postoperatively between techniques. The aim of this study was to assess in-house and postoperative opioid consumption across 3 surgical techniques. METHODS: Patients were stratified by technique: posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), and cortical screw (CS) instrumentation with interbody fusion. Age, ASA, BMI, depression, preoperative opioid use, EBL, and OR time were recorded and compared across surgical groups using Welch’s ANOVA and chi-square analysis. Total morphine equivalent dose (MED) was tabulated for both in-house consumption and postoperative prescriptions and was compared across surgical techniques using Welch’s ANOVA analysis, Mann Whitney U tests, and linear regression. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty nine patients underwent one- or two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion between 2016 and 2020. One hundred and twenty one patients underwent CS instrumentation, 95 underwent PLIF, and 83 underwent MIS-TLIF. There was a significantly higher percentage of patients who had a history of depression and preoperative opioid consumption in the CS group (P = .001, P = .009). CS instrumentation required significantly less total post-op opioids per kilogram bodyweight compared to MIS-TLIF and PLIF surgeries (P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent CS instrumentation required less opioids postoperatively. CS instrumentation may be associated with less postoperative pain due to the less invasive approach, however, patient education and prescriber practice also play a role in postoperative opioid consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10556896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105568962023-10-07 Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques LeRoy, Taryn E. Moon, Andrew Chilton, Matthew Gedman, Marissa Aidlen, Jessica P. Rogerson, Ashley Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVES: With increased awareness of the opioid crisis in spine surgery, the focus postoperatively has shifted to managing surgical site pain while minimizing opioid use. Numerous studies have compared outcomes and fusion status of different interbody fusion techniques; however, there is limited literature evaluating opioid consumption postoperatively between techniques. The aim of this study was to assess in-house and postoperative opioid consumption across 3 surgical techniques. METHODS: Patients were stratified by technique: posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), and cortical screw (CS) instrumentation with interbody fusion. Age, ASA, BMI, depression, preoperative opioid use, EBL, and OR time were recorded and compared across surgical groups using Welch’s ANOVA and chi-square analysis. Total morphine equivalent dose (MED) was tabulated for both in-house consumption and postoperative prescriptions and was compared across surgical techniques using Welch’s ANOVA analysis, Mann Whitney U tests, and linear regression. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty nine patients underwent one- or two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion between 2016 and 2020. One hundred and twenty one patients underwent CS instrumentation, 95 underwent PLIF, and 83 underwent MIS-TLIF. There was a significantly higher percentage of patients who had a history of depression and preoperative opioid consumption in the CS group (P = .001, P = .009). CS instrumentation required significantly less total post-op opioids per kilogram bodyweight compared to MIS-TLIF and PLIF surgeries (P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent CS instrumentation required less opioids postoperatively. CS instrumentation may be associated with less postoperative pain due to the less invasive approach, however, patient education and prescriber practice also play a role in postoperative opioid consumption. SAGE Publications 2021-12-17 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10556896/ /pubmed/34920687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211067747 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
LeRoy, Taryn E.
Moon, Andrew
Chilton, Matthew
Gedman, Marissa
Aidlen, Jessica P.
Rogerson, Ashley
Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques
title Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques
title_full Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques
title_fullStr Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques
title_short Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques
title_sort comparison of opioid consumption patterns of three interbody fusion surgical techniques
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34920687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211067747
work_keys_str_mv AT leroytaryne comparisonofopioidconsumptionpatternsofthreeinterbodyfusionsurgicaltechniques
AT moonandrew comparisonofopioidconsumptionpatternsofthreeinterbodyfusionsurgicaltechniques
AT chiltonmatthew comparisonofopioidconsumptionpatternsofthreeinterbodyfusionsurgicaltechniques
AT gedmanmarissa comparisonofopioidconsumptionpatternsofthreeinterbodyfusionsurgicaltechniques
AT aidlenjessicap comparisonofopioidconsumptionpatternsofthreeinterbodyfusionsurgicaltechniques
AT rogersonashley comparisonofopioidconsumptionpatternsofthreeinterbodyfusionsurgicaltechniques