Cargando…
Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVES: With increased awareness of the opioid crisis in spine surgery, the focus postoperatively has shifted to managing surgical site pain while minimizing opioid use. Numerous studies have compared outcomes and fusion status of different interbody fusion te...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34920687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211067747 |
_version_ | 1785116968355889152 |
---|---|
author | LeRoy, Taryn E. Moon, Andrew Chilton, Matthew Gedman, Marissa Aidlen, Jessica P. Rogerson, Ashley |
author_facet | LeRoy, Taryn E. Moon, Andrew Chilton, Matthew Gedman, Marissa Aidlen, Jessica P. Rogerson, Ashley |
author_sort | LeRoy, Taryn E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVES: With increased awareness of the opioid crisis in spine surgery, the focus postoperatively has shifted to managing surgical site pain while minimizing opioid use. Numerous studies have compared outcomes and fusion status of different interbody fusion techniques; however, there is limited literature evaluating opioid consumption postoperatively between techniques. The aim of this study was to assess in-house and postoperative opioid consumption across 3 surgical techniques. METHODS: Patients were stratified by technique: posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), and cortical screw (CS) instrumentation with interbody fusion. Age, ASA, BMI, depression, preoperative opioid use, EBL, and OR time were recorded and compared across surgical groups using Welch’s ANOVA and chi-square analysis. Total morphine equivalent dose (MED) was tabulated for both in-house consumption and postoperative prescriptions and was compared across surgical techniques using Welch’s ANOVA analysis, Mann Whitney U tests, and linear regression. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty nine patients underwent one- or two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion between 2016 and 2020. One hundred and twenty one patients underwent CS instrumentation, 95 underwent PLIF, and 83 underwent MIS-TLIF. There was a significantly higher percentage of patients who had a history of depression and preoperative opioid consumption in the CS group (P = .001, P = .009). CS instrumentation required significantly less total post-op opioids per kilogram bodyweight compared to MIS-TLIF and PLIF surgeries (P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent CS instrumentation required less opioids postoperatively. CS instrumentation may be associated with less postoperative pain due to the less invasive approach, however, patient education and prescriber practice also play a role in postoperative opioid consumption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10556896 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105568962023-10-07 Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques LeRoy, Taryn E. Moon, Andrew Chilton, Matthew Gedman, Marissa Aidlen, Jessica P. Rogerson, Ashley Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVES: With increased awareness of the opioid crisis in spine surgery, the focus postoperatively has shifted to managing surgical site pain while minimizing opioid use. Numerous studies have compared outcomes and fusion status of different interbody fusion techniques; however, there is limited literature evaluating opioid consumption postoperatively between techniques. The aim of this study was to assess in-house and postoperative opioid consumption across 3 surgical techniques. METHODS: Patients were stratified by technique: posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), and cortical screw (CS) instrumentation with interbody fusion. Age, ASA, BMI, depression, preoperative opioid use, EBL, and OR time were recorded and compared across surgical groups using Welch’s ANOVA and chi-square analysis. Total morphine equivalent dose (MED) was tabulated for both in-house consumption and postoperative prescriptions and was compared across surgical techniques using Welch’s ANOVA analysis, Mann Whitney U tests, and linear regression. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty nine patients underwent one- or two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion between 2016 and 2020. One hundred and twenty one patients underwent CS instrumentation, 95 underwent PLIF, and 83 underwent MIS-TLIF. There was a significantly higher percentage of patients who had a history of depression and preoperative opioid consumption in the CS group (P = .001, P = .009). CS instrumentation required significantly less total post-op opioids per kilogram bodyweight compared to MIS-TLIF and PLIF surgeries (P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent CS instrumentation required less opioids postoperatively. CS instrumentation may be associated with less postoperative pain due to the less invasive approach, however, patient education and prescriber practice also play a role in postoperative opioid consumption. SAGE Publications 2021-12-17 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10556896/ /pubmed/34920687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211067747 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles LeRoy, Taryn E. Moon, Andrew Chilton, Matthew Gedman, Marissa Aidlen, Jessica P. Rogerson, Ashley Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques |
title | Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques |
title_full | Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques |
title_short | Comparison of Opioid Consumption Patterns of Three Interbody Fusion Surgical Techniques |
title_sort | comparison of opioid consumption patterns of three interbody fusion surgical techniques |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34920687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211067747 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leroytaryne comparisonofopioidconsumptionpatternsofthreeinterbodyfusionsurgicaltechniques AT moonandrew comparisonofopioidconsumptionpatternsofthreeinterbodyfusionsurgicaltechniques AT chiltonmatthew comparisonofopioidconsumptionpatternsofthreeinterbodyfusionsurgicaltechniques AT gedmanmarissa comparisonofopioidconsumptionpatternsofthreeinterbodyfusionsurgicaltechniques AT aidlenjessicap comparisonofopioidconsumptionpatternsofthreeinterbodyfusionsurgicaltechniques AT rogersonashley comparisonofopioidconsumptionpatternsofthreeinterbodyfusionsurgicaltechniques |