Cargando…
The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate
STUDY DESIGN: Simulation study. OBJECTIVE: Pelvic incidence (PI) should be considered during surgical planning. The ideal patient position with both hip centers perfectly aligned for a lateral radiograph is rarely obtained. It has been suggested that a radiograph with axial and coronal rotation up t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211049734 |
_version_ | 1785116972876300288 |
---|---|
author | Fisk, Felicity Oitment, Colby Taliaferro, Kevin Pahuta, Markian A. |
author_facet | Fisk, Felicity Oitment, Colby Taliaferro, Kevin Pahuta, Markian A. |
author_sort | Fisk, Felicity |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Simulation study. OBJECTIVE: Pelvic incidence (PI) should be considered during surgical planning. The ideal patient position with both hip centers perfectly aligned for a lateral radiograph is rarely obtained. It has been suggested that a radiograph with axial and coronal rotation up to 20° is acceptable to obtain a measured PI within 6 degrees of the actual PI. We seek to: (1) evaluate the effect of variations in PI and patient malpositioning on measured vs true PI, and (2) determine whether the presence of one hip center within the bony acetabular rim of the contralateral hip can serve as a simple clinical decision rule on the accuracy of measured PI. METHODS: Published anthropometric three-dimensional pelvic landmark coordinates were used in this study. Radiographic projections were generated using linear algebra for combinations of axial and coronal rotation from −20° to +20°. True and measured PIs were compared. RESULTS: Rotation to 20° cannot be uniformly accepted as decision rule. Pelvises with higher PIs are more sensitive to malpositioning with greater PI deviation with smaller amounts of rotation. Diagnostic performance of the hip center rule demonstrated a sensitivity of 25.58% and a specificity of 100.00%. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than assessing the quality of radiographs for PI measurement by magnitude of malpositioning, we recommend clinicians use the “hip center rule.” As long as at least one hip center is contained within the bony acetabular rim of the contralateral hip, there is high confidence that measured PI will be within 6° of true PI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10556915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105569152023-10-07 The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate Fisk, Felicity Oitment, Colby Taliaferro, Kevin Pahuta, Markian A. Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Simulation study. OBJECTIVE: Pelvic incidence (PI) should be considered during surgical planning. The ideal patient position with both hip centers perfectly aligned for a lateral radiograph is rarely obtained. It has been suggested that a radiograph with axial and coronal rotation up to 20° is acceptable to obtain a measured PI within 6 degrees of the actual PI. We seek to: (1) evaluate the effect of variations in PI and patient malpositioning on measured vs true PI, and (2) determine whether the presence of one hip center within the bony acetabular rim of the contralateral hip can serve as a simple clinical decision rule on the accuracy of measured PI. METHODS: Published anthropometric three-dimensional pelvic landmark coordinates were used in this study. Radiographic projections were generated using linear algebra for combinations of axial and coronal rotation from −20° to +20°. True and measured PIs were compared. RESULTS: Rotation to 20° cannot be uniformly accepted as decision rule. Pelvises with higher PIs are more sensitive to malpositioning with greater PI deviation with smaller amounts of rotation. Diagnostic performance of the hip center rule demonstrated a sensitivity of 25.58% and a specificity of 100.00%. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than assessing the quality of radiographs for PI measurement by magnitude of malpositioning, we recommend clinicians use the “hip center rule.” As long as at least one hip center is contained within the bony acetabular rim of the contralateral hip, there is high confidence that measured PI will be within 6° of true PI. SAGE Publications 2021-10-18 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10556915/ /pubmed/34658284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211049734 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Fisk, Felicity Oitment, Colby Taliaferro, Kevin Pahuta, Markian A. The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate |
title | The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate |
title_full | The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate |
title_fullStr | The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate |
title_full_unstemmed | The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate |
title_short | The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate |
title_sort | hip center rule can be used to decide if measured pelvic incidence is accurate |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211049734 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fiskfelicity thehipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate AT oitmentcolby thehipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate AT taliaferrokevin thehipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate AT pahutamarkiana thehipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate AT fiskfelicity hipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate AT oitmentcolby hipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate AT taliaferrokevin hipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate AT pahutamarkiana hipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate |