Cargando…

The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate

STUDY DESIGN: Simulation study. OBJECTIVE: Pelvic incidence (PI) should be considered during surgical planning. The ideal patient position with both hip centers perfectly aligned for a lateral radiograph is rarely obtained. It has been suggested that a radiograph with axial and coronal rotation up t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fisk, Felicity, Oitment, Colby, Taliaferro, Kevin, Pahuta, Markian A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211049734
_version_ 1785116972876300288
author Fisk, Felicity
Oitment, Colby
Taliaferro, Kevin
Pahuta, Markian A.
author_facet Fisk, Felicity
Oitment, Colby
Taliaferro, Kevin
Pahuta, Markian A.
author_sort Fisk, Felicity
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Simulation study. OBJECTIVE: Pelvic incidence (PI) should be considered during surgical planning. The ideal patient position with both hip centers perfectly aligned for a lateral radiograph is rarely obtained. It has been suggested that a radiograph with axial and coronal rotation up to 20° is acceptable to obtain a measured PI within 6 degrees of the actual PI. We seek to: (1) evaluate the effect of variations in PI and patient malpositioning on measured vs true PI, and (2) determine whether the presence of one hip center within the bony acetabular rim of the contralateral hip can serve as a simple clinical decision rule on the accuracy of measured PI. METHODS: Published anthropometric three-dimensional pelvic landmark coordinates were used in this study. Radiographic projections were generated using linear algebra for combinations of axial and coronal rotation from −20° to +20°. True and measured PIs were compared. RESULTS: Rotation to 20° cannot be uniformly accepted as decision rule. Pelvises with higher PIs are more sensitive to malpositioning with greater PI deviation with smaller amounts of rotation. Diagnostic performance of the hip center rule demonstrated a sensitivity of 25.58% and a specificity of 100.00%. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than assessing the quality of radiographs for PI measurement by magnitude of malpositioning, we recommend clinicians use the “hip center rule.” As long as at least one hip center is contained within the bony acetabular rim of the contralateral hip, there is high confidence that measured PI will be within 6° of true PI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10556915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105569152023-10-07 The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate Fisk, Felicity Oitment, Colby Taliaferro, Kevin Pahuta, Markian A. Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Simulation study. OBJECTIVE: Pelvic incidence (PI) should be considered during surgical planning. The ideal patient position with both hip centers perfectly aligned for a lateral radiograph is rarely obtained. It has been suggested that a radiograph with axial and coronal rotation up to 20° is acceptable to obtain a measured PI within 6 degrees of the actual PI. We seek to: (1) evaluate the effect of variations in PI and patient malpositioning on measured vs true PI, and (2) determine whether the presence of one hip center within the bony acetabular rim of the contralateral hip can serve as a simple clinical decision rule on the accuracy of measured PI. METHODS: Published anthropometric three-dimensional pelvic landmark coordinates were used in this study. Radiographic projections were generated using linear algebra for combinations of axial and coronal rotation from −20° to +20°. True and measured PIs were compared. RESULTS: Rotation to 20° cannot be uniformly accepted as decision rule. Pelvises with higher PIs are more sensitive to malpositioning with greater PI deviation with smaller amounts of rotation. Diagnostic performance of the hip center rule demonstrated a sensitivity of 25.58% and a specificity of 100.00%. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than assessing the quality of radiographs for PI measurement by magnitude of malpositioning, we recommend clinicians use the “hip center rule.” As long as at least one hip center is contained within the bony acetabular rim of the contralateral hip, there is high confidence that measured PI will be within 6° of true PI. SAGE Publications 2021-10-18 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10556915/ /pubmed/34658284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211049734 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fisk, Felicity
Oitment, Colby
Taliaferro, Kevin
Pahuta, Markian A.
The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate
title The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate
title_full The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate
title_fullStr The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate
title_full_unstemmed The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate
title_short The Hip Center Rule Can be Used to Decide if Measured Pelvic Incidence is Accurate
title_sort hip center rule can be used to decide if measured pelvic incidence is accurate
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211049734
work_keys_str_mv AT fiskfelicity thehipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate
AT oitmentcolby thehipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate
AT taliaferrokevin thehipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate
AT pahutamarkiana thehipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate
AT fiskfelicity hipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate
AT oitmentcolby hipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate
AT taliaferrokevin hipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate
AT pahutamarkiana hipcenterrulecanbeusedtodecideifmeasuredpelvicincidenceisaccurate