Cargando…

Heterogeneity and Utility of Pharmaceutical Company Sharing of Individual-Participant Data Packages

IMPORTANCE: The pharmaceutical industry has made substantial investments in developing processes for sharing individual-participant data (IPD) from clinical trials. However, the utility and completeness of shared IPD and supporting documents must be evaluated to ensure the potential for scientific a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hopkins, Ashley M., Modi, Natansh D., Abuhelwa, Ahmad Y., Kichenadasse, Ganessan, Kuderer, Nicole M., Lyman, Gary H., Wiese, Michael D., McKinnon, Ross A., Rockhold, Frank W., Mann, Aaron, Rowland, Andrew, Sorich, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3996
_version_ 1785116998646104064
author Hopkins, Ashley M.
Modi, Natansh D.
Abuhelwa, Ahmad Y.
Kichenadasse, Ganessan
Kuderer, Nicole M.
Lyman, Gary H.
Wiese, Michael D.
McKinnon, Ross A.
Rockhold, Frank W.
Mann, Aaron
Rowland, Andrew
Sorich, Michael J.
author_facet Hopkins, Ashley M.
Modi, Natansh D.
Abuhelwa, Ahmad Y.
Kichenadasse, Ganessan
Kuderer, Nicole M.
Lyman, Gary H.
Wiese, Michael D.
McKinnon, Ross A.
Rockhold, Frank W.
Mann, Aaron
Rowland, Andrew
Sorich, Michael J.
author_sort Hopkins, Ashley M.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: The pharmaceutical industry has made substantial investments in developing processes for sharing individual-participant data (IPD) from clinical trials. However, the utility and completeness of shared IPD and supporting documents must be evaluated to ensure the potential for scientific advancements from the data sharing ecosystem can be realized. OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility and completeness of IPD and supporting documents provided from industry-sponsored clinical trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From February 9, 2022, to February 9, 2023, 91 of 203 clinical trials supporting US Food and Drug Administration registrations of anticancer medicines for the treatment of solid tumors from the past decade were confirmed as eligible for IPD request. This quality improvement study performed a retrospective audit of the utility and completeness of the IPD and supporting documents provided from the 91 clinical trials for a planned meta-analysis. EXPOSURES: Request for IPD from 91 clinical oncology trials indicated as eligible for the request. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The utility and completeness of the IPD and supporting documents provided. RESULTS: The IPD packages were obtained from 70 of 91 requested clinical trials (77%). The median time to data provision was 123 (range, 117-352) days. Redactions were observed in 18 of the acquired IPD packages (26%) for outcome data, 11 (16%) for assessment variables, and 19 (27%) for adjustment data. Additionally, 20 IPD packages (29%) lacked a clinical study report, 4 (6%) had incomplete or missing data dictionaries, and 20 (29%) were missing anonymization or redaction description files. Access to IPD from 21 eligible trials (23%) was not granted. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this quality improvement study, there was substantial variability within the provided IPD packages regarding the completeness of key data variables and supporting documents. To improve the data sharing ecosystem, key areas for enhancement include (1) ensuring that clinical trials are eligible for IPD sharing, (2) making eligible IPD transparently accessible, and (3) ensuring that IPD packages meet a standard of utility and completeness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10557028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105570282023-10-07 Heterogeneity and Utility of Pharmaceutical Company Sharing of Individual-Participant Data Packages Hopkins, Ashley M. Modi, Natansh D. Abuhelwa, Ahmad Y. Kichenadasse, Ganessan Kuderer, Nicole M. Lyman, Gary H. Wiese, Michael D. McKinnon, Ross A. Rockhold, Frank W. Mann, Aaron Rowland, Andrew Sorich, Michael J. JAMA Oncol Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: The pharmaceutical industry has made substantial investments in developing processes for sharing individual-participant data (IPD) from clinical trials. However, the utility and completeness of shared IPD and supporting documents must be evaluated to ensure the potential for scientific advancements from the data sharing ecosystem can be realized. OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility and completeness of IPD and supporting documents provided from industry-sponsored clinical trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From February 9, 2022, to February 9, 2023, 91 of 203 clinical trials supporting US Food and Drug Administration registrations of anticancer medicines for the treatment of solid tumors from the past decade were confirmed as eligible for IPD request. This quality improvement study performed a retrospective audit of the utility and completeness of the IPD and supporting documents provided from the 91 clinical trials for a planned meta-analysis. EXPOSURES: Request for IPD from 91 clinical oncology trials indicated as eligible for the request. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The utility and completeness of the IPD and supporting documents provided. RESULTS: The IPD packages were obtained from 70 of 91 requested clinical trials (77%). The median time to data provision was 123 (range, 117-352) days. Redactions were observed in 18 of the acquired IPD packages (26%) for outcome data, 11 (16%) for assessment variables, and 19 (27%) for adjustment data. Additionally, 20 IPD packages (29%) lacked a clinical study report, 4 (6%) had incomplete or missing data dictionaries, and 20 (29%) were missing anonymization or redaction description files. Access to IPD from 21 eligible trials (23%) was not granted. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this quality improvement study, there was substantial variability within the provided IPD packages regarding the completeness of key data variables and supporting documents. To improve the data sharing ecosystem, key areas for enhancement include (1) ensuring that clinical trials are eligible for IPD sharing, (2) making eligible IPD transparently accessible, and (3) ensuring that IPD packages meet a standard of utility and completeness. American Medical Association 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10557028/ /pubmed/37796495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3996 Text en Copyright 2023 Hopkins AM et al. JAMA Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Hopkins, Ashley M.
Modi, Natansh D.
Abuhelwa, Ahmad Y.
Kichenadasse, Ganessan
Kuderer, Nicole M.
Lyman, Gary H.
Wiese, Michael D.
McKinnon, Ross A.
Rockhold, Frank W.
Mann, Aaron
Rowland, Andrew
Sorich, Michael J.
Heterogeneity and Utility of Pharmaceutical Company Sharing of Individual-Participant Data Packages
title Heterogeneity and Utility of Pharmaceutical Company Sharing of Individual-Participant Data Packages
title_full Heterogeneity and Utility of Pharmaceutical Company Sharing of Individual-Participant Data Packages
title_fullStr Heterogeneity and Utility of Pharmaceutical Company Sharing of Individual-Participant Data Packages
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity and Utility of Pharmaceutical Company Sharing of Individual-Participant Data Packages
title_short Heterogeneity and Utility of Pharmaceutical Company Sharing of Individual-Participant Data Packages
title_sort heterogeneity and utility of pharmaceutical company sharing of individual-participant data packages
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3996
work_keys_str_mv AT hopkinsashleym heterogeneityandutilityofpharmaceuticalcompanysharingofindividualparticipantdatapackages
AT modinatanshd heterogeneityandutilityofpharmaceuticalcompanysharingofindividualparticipantdatapackages
AT abuhelwaahmady heterogeneityandutilityofpharmaceuticalcompanysharingofindividualparticipantdatapackages
AT kichenadasseganessan heterogeneityandutilityofpharmaceuticalcompanysharingofindividualparticipantdatapackages
AT kuderernicolem heterogeneityandutilityofpharmaceuticalcompanysharingofindividualparticipantdatapackages
AT lymangaryh heterogeneityandutilityofpharmaceuticalcompanysharingofindividualparticipantdatapackages
AT wiesemichaeld heterogeneityandutilityofpharmaceuticalcompanysharingofindividualparticipantdatapackages
AT mckinnonrossa heterogeneityandutilityofpharmaceuticalcompanysharingofindividualparticipantdatapackages
AT rockholdfrankw heterogeneityandutilityofpharmaceuticalcompanysharingofindividualparticipantdatapackages
AT mannaaron heterogeneityandutilityofpharmaceuticalcompanysharingofindividualparticipantdatapackages
AT rowlandandrew heterogeneityandutilityofpharmaceuticalcompanysharingofindividualparticipantdatapackages
AT sorichmichaelj heterogeneityandutilityofpharmaceuticalcompanysharingofindividualparticipantdatapackages