Cargando…
Risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study
BACKGROUND: Epidural anesthesia (EA) is the regional anesthesia technique preferred over spinal anesthesia for pregnant women requiring cesarean section and post-operative pain control. EA failure requires additional sedation or conversion to general anesthesia (GA). This may be hazardous during sed...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02284-w |
_version_ | 1785117032915664896 |
---|---|
author | Chao, Wei-Hsiang Cheng, Wen-Shan Hu, Li-Ming Liao, Chia-Chih |
author_facet | Chao, Wei-Hsiang Cheng, Wen-Shan Hu, Li-Ming Liao, Chia-Chih |
author_sort | Chao, Wei-Hsiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Epidural anesthesia (EA) is the regional anesthesia technique preferred over spinal anesthesia for pregnant women requiring cesarean section and post-operative pain control. EA failure requires additional sedation or conversion to general anesthesia (GA). This may be hazardous during sedation or GA conversion because of potentially difficult airways. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to determine the risk factors for epidural failure during cesarean section anesthesia. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed parturients who underwent cesarean section under EA and catheterization at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan between January 1 and December 31, 2018. Patient data were collected from the medical records. EA failure was defined as the administration of any intravenous anesthetic at any time during a cesarean section, converting it into GA. RESULTS: A total of 534 parturients who underwent cesarean section were recruited for this study. Of them, 94 (17.6%) experienced EA failure during cesarean section. Compared to the patients with successful EA, those with EA failure were younger (33.0 years vs. 34.7 years), had received EA previously (60.6% vs. 37%), were parous (72.3% vs. 55%), and had a shorter waiting time (14.9 min vs. 16.5 min) (p < 0.05). Younger age (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86–0.95), history of epidural analgesia (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.38–4.94), and shorter waiting time (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87–0.97) were estimated to be significantly associated with a higher risk of epidural anesthesia failure. CONCLUSION: The retrospective study found that parturients of younger age, previous epidural catheterization history, and inadequate waiting time may have a higher risk of EA failure. Previous epidural catheterization increased the risk of EA failure by 2.6-fold compared to patient with no history of catheterization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10557188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105571882023-10-07 Risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study Chao, Wei-Hsiang Cheng, Wen-Shan Hu, Li-Ming Liao, Chia-Chih BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Epidural anesthesia (EA) is the regional anesthesia technique preferred over spinal anesthesia for pregnant women requiring cesarean section and post-operative pain control. EA failure requires additional sedation or conversion to general anesthesia (GA). This may be hazardous during sedation or GA conversion because of potentially difficult airways. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to determine the risk factors for epidural failure during cesarean section anesthesia. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed parturients who underwent cesarean section under EA and catheterization at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan between January 1 and December 31, 2018. Patient data were collected from the medical records. EA failure was defined as the administration of any intravenous anesthetic at any time during a cesarean section, converting it into GA. RESULTS: A total of 534 parturients who underwent cesarean section were recruited for this study. Of them, 94 (17.6%) experienced EA failure during cesarean section. Compared to the patients with successful EA, those with EA failure were younger (33.0 years vs. 34.7 years), had received EA previously (60.6% vs. 37%), were parous (72.3% vs. 55%), and had a shorter waiting time (14.9 min vs. 16.5 min) (p < 0.05). Younger age (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86–0.95), history of epidural analgesia (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.38–4.94), and shorter waiting time (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87–0.97) were estimated to be significantly associated with a higher risk of epidural anesthesia failure. CONCLUSION: The retrospective study found that parturients of younger age, previous epidural catheterization history, and inadequate waiting time may have a higher risk of EA failure. Previous epidural catheterization increased the risk of EA failure by 2.6-fold compared to patient with no history of catheterization. BioMed Central 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10557188/ /pubmed/37803290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02284-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chao, Wei-Hsiang Cheng, Wen-Shan Hu, Li-Ming Liao, Chia-Chih Risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study |
title | Risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study |
title_full | Risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study |
title_short | Risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study |
title_sort | risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02284-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaoweihsiang riskfactorsforepiduralanesthesiablockadefailureincesareansectionaretrospectivestudy AT chengwenshan riskfactorsforepiduralanesthesiablockadefailureincesareansectionaretrospectivestudy AT huliming riskfactorsforepiduralanesthesiablockadefailureincesareansectionaretrospectivestudy AT liaochiachih riskfactorsforepiduralanesthesiablockadefailureincesareansectionaretrospectivestudy |