Cargando…
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Health problems in neonates with gestational age (GA) ≥ 32 weeks remain a major medical concern. Respiratory distress (RD) is one of the common reasons for admission of neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) represents a crucial approach to treat RD, and currently, th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07665-7 |
_version_ | 1785117038262353920 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Rong Xiong, Tao Tang, Jun Huang, Yi Liu, Wenli Zhu, Jun Chen, Chao Gong, Lingyue Tian, Ke Wang, Aoyu Mu, Dezhi |
author_facet | Zhou, Rong Xiong, Tao Tang, Jun Huang, Yi Liu, Wenli Zhu, Jun Chen, Chao Gong, Lingyue Tian, Ke Wang, Aoyu Mu, Dezhi |
author_sort | Zhou, Rong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health problems in neonates with gestational age (GA) ≥ 32 weeks remain a major medical concern. Respiratory distress (RD) is one of the common reasons for admission of neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) represents a crucial approach to treat RD, and currently, the most used NIV modes in neonatal intensive care unit include high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Although extensive evidence supports the use of NIPPV in neonates with a GA < 32 weeks, limited data exist regarding its effectiveness in neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of HFNC, CPAP, and NIPPV as primary NIV in neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks who experience RD. METHODS: This trial is designed as an assessor-blinded, three-arm, multi-center, parallel, randomized controlled trial, conducted in neonates ≥ 32 weeks’ GA requiring primary NIV in the first 24 h of life. The neonates will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: HFNC, CPAP or NIPPV group. The effectiveness, safety and comfort of NIV will be evaluated. The primary outcome is the occurrence of treatment failure within 72 h after enrollment. Secondary outcomes include death before discharge, surfactant treatment within 72 h after randomization, duration of both noninvasive and invasive mechanical ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, time to achieve full enteral nutrition, necrotizing enterocolitis, duration of admission, cost of admission, air leak syndrome, nasal trauma, and comfort score. DISCUSSION: Currently, there is a paucity of data regarding the utilization of NIPPV in neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks. This study will provide clinical evidence for the development of respiratory treatment strategies in neonates at GA ≥ 32 weeks with RD, with the aim of minimizing the incidence of tracheal intubation and reducing the complications associated with NIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300069192. Registered on March 9, 2023, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=171491. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10557210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105572102023-10-07 High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial Zhou, Rong Xiong, Tao Tang, Jun Huang, Yi Liu, Wenli Zhu, Jun Chen, Chao Gong, Lingyue Tian, Ke Wang, Aoyu Mu, Dezhi Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Health problems in neonates with gestational age (GA) ≥ 32 weeks remain a major medical concern. Respiratory distress (RD) is one of the common reasons for admission of neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) represents a crucial approach to treat RD, and currently, the most used NIV modes in neonatal intensive care unit include high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Although extensive evidence supports the use of NIPPV in neonates with a GA < 32 weeks, limited data exist regarding its effectiveness in neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of HFNC, CPAP, and NIPPV as primary NIV in neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks who experience RD. METHODS: This trial is designed as an assessor-blinded, three-arm, multi-center, parallel, randomized controlled trial, conducted in neonates ≥ 32 weeks’ GA requiring primary NIV in the first 24 h of life. The neonates will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: HFNC, CPAP or NIPPV group. The effectiveness, safety and comfort of NIV will be evaluated. The primary outcome is the occurrence of treatment failure within 72 h after enrollment. Secondary outcomes include death before discharge, surfactant treatment within 72 h after randomization, duration of both noninvasive and invasive mechanical ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, time to achieve full enteral nutrition, necrotizing enterocolitis, duration of admission, cost of admission, air leak syndrome, nasal trauma, and comfort score. DISCUSSION: Currently, there is a paucity of data regarding the utilization of NIPPV in neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks. This study will provide clinical evidence for the development of respiratory treatment strategies in neonates at GA ≥ 32 weeks with RD, with the aim of minimizing the incidence of tracheal intubation and reducing the complications associated with NIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300069192. Registered on March 9, 2023, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=171491. BioMed Central 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10557210/ /pubmed/37803402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07665-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Zhou, Rong Xiong, Tao Tang, Jun Huang, Yi Liu, Wenli Zhu, Jun Chen, Chao Gong, Lingyue Tian, Ke Wang, Aoyu Mu, Dezhi High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial |
title | High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial |
title_full | High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial |
title_short | High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | high-flow nasal cannula (hfnc) vs continuous positive airway pressure (cpap) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (ga): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07665-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhourong highflownasalcannulahfncvscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapvsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasprimaryrespiratorysupportininfantsof32weeksgestationalagegastudyprotocolforathreearmmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xiongtao highflownasalcannulahfncvscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapvsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasprimaryrespiratorysupportininfantsof32weeksgestationalagegastudyprotocolforathreearmmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tangjun highflownasalcannulahfncvscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapvsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasprimaryrespiratorysupportininfantsof32weeksgestationalagegastudyprotocolforathreearmmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT huangyi highflownasalcannulahfncvscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapvsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasprimaryrespiratorysupportininfantsof32weeksgestationalagegastudyprotocolforathreearmmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liuwenli highflownasalcannulahfncvscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapvsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasprimaryrespiratorysupportininfantsof32weeksgestationalagegastudyprotocolforathreearmmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhujun highflownasalcannulahfncvscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapvsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasprimaryrespiratorysupportininfantsof32weeksgestationalagegastudyprotocolforathreearmmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenchao highflownasalcannulahfncvscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapvsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasprimaryrespiratorysupportininfantsof32weeksgestationalagegastudyprotocolforathreearmmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gonglingyue highflownasalcannulahfncvscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapvsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasprimaryrespiratorysupportininfantsof32weeksgestationalagegastudyprotocolforathreearmmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tianke highflownasalcannulahfncvscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapvsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasprimaryrespiratorysupportininfantsof32weeksgestationalagegastudyprotocolforathreearmmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangaoyu highflownasalcannulahfncvscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapvsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasprimaryrespiratorysupportininfantsof32weeksgestationalagegastudyprotocolforathreearmmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mudezhi highflownasalcannulahfncvscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapvsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasprimaryrespiratorysupportininfantsof32weeksgestationalagegastudyprotocolforathreearmmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |