Cargando…

Restrictive versus high-dose oxygenation strategy in post-arrest management following adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Neurological damage is the main cause of death or withdrawal of care in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest (CA). Hypoxemia and hyperoxemia following CA were described as potentially harmful, but reports were inconsistent. Current guidelines lack specific oxygen targets after return of spo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macherey-Meyer, S., Heyne, S., Meertens, M. M., Braumann, S., Hueser, C., Mauri, V., Baldus, S., Lee, S., Adler, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04669-2
_version_ 1785117057589706752
author Macherey-Meyer, S.
Heyne, S.
Meertens, M. M.
Braumann, S.
Hueser, C.
Mauri, V.
Baldus, S.
Lee, S.
Adler, C.
author_facet Macherey-Meyer, S.
Heyne, S.
Meertens, M. M.
Braumann, S.
Hueser, C.
Mauri, V.
Baldus, S.
Lee, S.
Adler, C.
author_sort Macherey-Meyer, S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Neurological damage is the main cause of death or withdrawal of care in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest (CA). Hypoxemia and hyperoxemia following CA were described as potentially harmful, but reports were inconsistent. Current guidelines lack specific oxygen targets after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). OBJECTIVES: The current meta-analysis assessed the effects of restrictive compared to high-dose oxygenation strategy in survivors of CA. METHODS: A structured literature search was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two competing oxygenation strategies in post-ROSC management after CA were eligible. The primary end point was short-term survival (≤ 90 days). The meta-analysis was prospectively registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42023444513). RESULTS: Eight RCTs enrolling 1941 patients were eligible. Restrictive oxygenation was applied to 964 patients, high-dose regimens were used in 977 participants. Short-term survival rate was 55.7% in restrictive and 56% in high-dose oxygenation group (8 trials, RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.10, P = 0.90, I(2) = 18%, no difference). No evidence for a difference was detected in survival to hospital discharge (5 trials, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.21, P = 0.84, I(2) = 32%). Episodes of hypoxemia more frequently occurred in restrictive oxygenation group (4 trials, RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.89, P = 0.004, I(2) = 13%). CONCLUSION: Restrictive and high-dose oxygenation strategy following CA did not result in differences in short-term or in-hospital survival. Restrictive oxygenation strategy may increase episodes of hypoxemia, even with restrictive oxygenation targets exceeding intended saturation levels, but the clinical relevance is unknown. There is still a wide gap in the evidence of optimized oxygenation in post-ROSC management and specific targets cannot be concluded from the current evidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04669-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10557287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105572872023-10-07 Restrictive versus high-dose oxygenation strategy in post-arrest management following adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis Macherey-Meyer, S. Heyne, S. Meertens, M. M. Braumann, S. Hueser, C. Mauri, V. Baldus, S. Lee, S. Adler, C. Crit Care Research PURPOSE: Neurological damage is the main cause of death or withdrawal of care in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest (CA). Hypoxemia and hyperoxemia following CA were described as potentially harmful, but reports were inconsistent. Current guidelines lack specific oxygen targets after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). OBJECTIVES: The current meta-analysis assessed the effects of restrictive compared to high-dose oxygenation strategy in survivors of CA. METHODS: A structured literature search was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two competing oxygenation strategies in post-ROSC management after CA were eligible. The primary end point was short-term survival (≤ 90 days). The meta-analysis was prospectively registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42023444513). RESULTS: Eight RCTs enrolling 1941 patients were eligible. Restrictive oxygenation was applied to 964 patients, high-dose regimens were used in 977 participants. Short-term survival rate was 55.7% in restrictive and 56% in high-dose oxygenation group (8 trials, RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.10, P = 0.90, I(2) = 18%, no difference). No evidence for a difference was detected in survival to hospital discharge (5 trials, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.21, P = 0.84, I(2) = 32%). Episodes of hypoxemia more frequently occurred in restrictive oxygenation group (4 trials, RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.89, P = 0.004, I(2) = 13%). CONCLUSION: Restrictive and high-dose oxygenation strategy following CA did not result in differences in short-term or in-hospital survival. Restrictive oxygenation strategy may increase episodes of hypoxemia, even with restrictive oxygenation targets exceeding intended saturation levels, but the clinical relevance is unknown. There is still a wide gap in the evidence of optimized oxygenation in post-ROSC management and specific targets cannot be concluded from the current evidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04669-2. BioMed Central 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10557287/ /pubmed/37798666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04669-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Macherey-Meyer, S.
Heyne, S.
Meertens, M. M.
Braumann, S.
Hueser, C.
Mauri, V.
Baldus, S.
Lee, S.
Adler, C.
Restrictive versus high-dose oxygenation strategy in post-arrest management following adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis
title Restrictive versus high-dose oxygenation strategy in post-arrest management following adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis
title_full Restrictive versus high-dose oxygenation strategy in post-arrest management following adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Restrictive versus high-dose oxygenation strategy in post-arrest management following adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Restrictive versus high-dose oxygenation strategy in post-arrest management following adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis
title_short Restrictive versus high-dose oxygenation strategy in post-arrest management following adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis
title_sort restrictive versus high-dose oxygenation strategy in post-arrest management following adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04669-2
work_keys_str_mv AT machereymeyers restrictiveversushighdoseoxygenationstrategyinpostarrestmanagementfollowingadultnontraumaticcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT heynes restrictiveversushighdoseoxygenationstrategyinpostarrestmanagementfollowingadultnontraumaticcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT meertensmm restrictiveversushighdoseoxygenationstrategyinpostarrestmanagementfollowingadultnontraumaticcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT braumanns restrictiveversushighdoseoxygenationstrategyinpostarrestmanagementfollowingadultnontraumaticcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT hueserc restrictiveversushighdoseoxygenationstrategyinpostarrestmanagementfollowingadultnontraumaticcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT mauriv restrictiveversushighdoseoxygenationstrategyinpostarrestmanagementfollowingadultnontraumaticcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT balduss restrictiveversushighdoseoxygenationstrategyinpostarrestmanagementfollowingadultnontraumaticcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT lees restrictiveversushighdoseoxygenationstrategyinpostarrestmanagementfollowingadultnontraumaticcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT adlerc restrictiveversushighdoseoxygenationstrategyinpostarrestmanagementfollowingadultnontraumaticcardiacarrestametaanalysis