Cargando…
Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis
BACKGROUND: Within the Learning Health System (LHS) model, learning routines, including evaluation, allow for continuous incremental change to take place. Within these learning routines, evaluation assists in problem identification, data collection, and data transformation into contextualized inform...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02348-5 |
_version_ | 1785117065195028480 |
---|---|
author | Bird, Marissa Côté-Boileau, Élizabeth Wodchis, Walter P. Jeffs, Lianne MacPhee, Maura Shaw, James Austin, Tujuanna Bruno, Frances Bhalla, Megan Gray, Carolyn Steele |
author_facet | Bird, Marissa Côté-Boileau, Élizabeth Wodchis, Walter P. Jeffs, Lianne MacPhee, Maura Shaw, James Austin, Tujuanna Bruno, Frances Bhalla, Megan Gray, Carolyn Steele |
author_sort | Bird, Marissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Within the Learning Health System (LHS) model, learning routines, including evaluation, allow for continuous incremental change to take place. Within these learning routines, evaluation assists in problem identification, data collection, and data transformation into contextualized information, which is then re-applied to the LHS environment. Evaluation that catalyzes learning and improvement may also contribute to health innovation sustainability. However, there is little consensus as to why certain evaluations seem to support learning and sustainability, while others impede it. This realist synthesis seeks to understand the contextual factors and underlying mechanisms or drivers that best support health systems learning and sustainable innovation. METHODS: This synthesis will be guided by Pawson and colleagues’ 2005 and Emmel and colleagues’ 2018 guidelines for conducting realist syntheses. The review process will encompass five steps: (1) scoping the review, (2) building theories, (3) identifying the evidence, (4) evidence selection and appraisal, and (5) data extraction and synthesis. An Expert Committee comprised of leaders in evaluation, innovation, sustainability, and realist methodology will guide this synthesis. Review findings will be reported using the RAMESES guidelines. DISCUSSION: The use of a realist review will allow for exploration and theorizing about the contextual factors and underlying mechanisms that make evaluations ‘work’ (or ‘not work’) to support learning and sustainability. Depending on results, we will attempt to synthesize findings into a series of recommendations for evaluations with the intention to support health systems learning and sustainability. Finalized results will be presented at national and international conferences, as well as disseminated via a peer-reviewed publication. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This realist synthesis protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ID 382690). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02348-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10557319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105573192023-10-07 Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis Bird, Marissa Côté-Boileau, Élizabeth Wodchis, Walter P. Jeffs, Lianne MacPhee, Maura Shaw, James Austin, Tujuanna Bruno, Frances Bhalla, Megan Gray, Carolyn Steele Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Within the Learning Health System (LHS) model, learning routines, including evaluation, allow for continuous incremental change to take place. Within these learning routines, evaluation assists in problem identification, data collection, and data transformation into contextualized information, which is then re-applied to the LHS environment. Evaluation that catalyzes learning and improvement may also contribute to health innovation sustainability. However, there is little consensus as to why certain evaluations seem to support learning and sustainability, while others impede it. This realist synthesis seeks to understand the contextual factors and underlying mechanisms or drivers that best support health systems learning and sustainable innovation. METHODS: This synthesis will be guided by Pawson and colleagues’ 2005 and Emmel and colleagues’ 2018 guidelines for conducting realist syntheses. The review process will encompass five steps: (1) scoping the review, (2) building theories, (3) identifying the evidence, (4) evidence selection and appraisal, and (5) data extraction and synthesis. An Expert Committee comprised of leaders in evaluation, innovation, sustainability, and realist methodology will guide this synthesis. Review findings will be reported using the RAMESES guidelines. DISCUSSION: The use of a realist review will allow for exploration and theorizing about the contextual factors and underlying mechanisms that make evaluations ‘work’ (or ‘not work’) to support learning and sustainability. Depending on results, we will attempt to synthesize findings into a series of recommendations for evaluations with the intention to support health systems learning and sustainability. Finalized results will be presented at national and international conferences, as well as disseminated via a peer-reviewed publication. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This realist synthesis protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ID 382690). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02348-5. BioMed Central 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10557319/ /pubmed/37803445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02348-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Bird, Marissa Côté-Boileau, Élizabeth Wodchis, Walter P. Jeffs, Lianne MacPhee, Maura Shaw, James Austin, Tujuanna Bruno, Frances Bhalla, Megan Gray, Carolyn Steele Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis |
title | Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis |
title_full | Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis |
title_fullStr | Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis |
title_short | Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis |
title_sort | exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02348-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT birdmarissa exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis AT coteboileauelizabeth exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis AT wodchiswalterp exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis AT jeffslianne exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis AT macpheemaura exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis AT shawjames exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis AT austintujuanna exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis AT brunofrances exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis AT bhallamegan exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis AT graycarolynsteele exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis |