Cargando…

Cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine in Argentina

BACKGROUND: Argentina currently uses a pentavalent vaccine containing diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whole cell), Haemophilus influenza type b and hepatitis B antigens, administered concomitantly with the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) (DTwP-Hib-HB plus IPV) in its childhood vaccination schedule....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olivera, Ignacio, Pérez, Carlos Grau, Lazarov, Luis, Lopez, Eduardo, Oddo, Cristian, Dibarboure, Hugo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10038-0
_version_ 1785117066819272704
author Olivera, Ignacio
Pérez, Carlos Grau
Lazarov, Luis
Lopez, Eduardo
Oddo, Cristian
Dibarboure, Hugo
author_facet Olivera, Ignacio
Pérez, Carlos Grau
Lazarov, Luis
Lopez, Eduardo
Oddo, Cristian
Dibarboure, Hugo
author_sort Olivera, Ignacio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Argentina currently uses a pentavalent vaccine containing diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whole cell), Haemophilus influenza type b and hepatitis B antigens, administered concomitantly with the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) (DTwP-Hib-HB plus IPV) in its childhood vaccination schedule. However, hexavalent vaccines containing acellular pertussis antigens (DTaP-Hib-HB-IPV) and providing protection against the same diseases are also licensed, but are only available with a private prescription or for high-risk pre-term infants in the public health program. We analyzed the cost of switching from the current schedule to the alternative schedule with the hexavalent vaccine in Argentina, assuming similar levels of effectiveness. METHODS: The study population was infants ≤ 1 year of age born in Argentina from 2015 to 2019. The analysis considered adverse events, programmatic, logistic, and vaccine costs of both schemes from the societal perspective. The societal costs were disaggregated to summarize costs incurred in the public sector and with vaccination pre-term infants in the public sector. Costs were expressed in 2021 US Dollars (US$). RESULTS: Although the cost of vaccines with the alternative scheme would be US$39.8 million (M) more than with the current scheme, these additional costs are in large part offset by fewer adverse event-associated costs and lower programmatic costs such that the overall cost of the alternative scheme would only be an additional US$3.6 M from the societal perspective. The additional cost associated with switching to the alternative scheme in the public sector and with the vaccination of pre-term infants in the public sector would be US$2.1 M and US$84,023, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The switch to an alternative scheme with the hexavalent vaccine in Argentina would result in marginally higher vaccine costs, which are mostly offset by the lower costs associated with improved logistics, fewer separate vaccines, and a reduction in adverse events. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10038-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10557326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105573262023-10-07 Cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine in Argentina Olivera, Ignacio Pérez, Carlos Grau Lazarov, Luis Lopez, Eduardo Oddo, Cristian Dibarboure, Hugo BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Argentina currently uses a pentavalent vaccine containing diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whole cell), Haemophilus influenza type b and hepatitis B antigens, administered concomitantly with the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) (DTwP-Hib-HB plus IPV) in its childhood vaccination schedule. However, hexavalent vaccines containing acellular pertussis antigens (DTaP-Hib-HB-IPV) and providing protection against the same diseases are also licensed, but are only available with a private prescription or for high-risk pre-term infants in the public health program. We analyzed the cost of switching from the current schedule to the alternative schedule with the hexavalent vaccine in Argentina, assuming similar levels of effectiveness. METHODS: The study population was infants ≤ 1 year of age born in Argentina from 2015 to 2019. The analysis considered adverse events, programmatic, logistic, and vaccine costs of both schemes from the societal perspective. The societal costs were disaggregated to summarize costs incurred in the public sector and with vaccination pre-term infants in the public sector. Costs were expressed in 2021 US Dollars (US$). RESULTS: Although the cost of vaccines with the alternative scheme would be US$39.8 million (M) more than with the current scheme, these additional costs are in large part offset by fewer adverse event-associated costs and lower programmatic costs such that the overall cost of the alternative scheme would only be an additional US$3.6 M from the societal perspective. The additional cost associated with switching to the alternative scheme in the public sector and with the vaccination of pre-term infants in the public sector would be US$2.1 M and US$84,023, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The switch to an alternative scheme with the hexavalent vaccine in Argentina would result in marginally higher vaccine costs, which are mostly offset by the lower costs associated with improved logistics, fewer separate vaccines, and a reduction in adverse events. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10038-0. BioMed Central 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10557326/ /pubmed/37803345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10038-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Olivera, Ignacio
Pérez, Carlos Grau
Lazarov, Luis
Lopez, Eduardo
Oddo, Cristian
Dibarboure, Hugo
Cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine in Argentina
title Cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine in Argentina
title_full Cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine in Argentina
title_fullStr Cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine in Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine in Argentina
title_short Cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine in Argentina
title_sort cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine in argentina
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10038-0
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveraignacio costminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccineinargentina
AT perezcarlosgrau costminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccineinargentina
AT lazarovluis costminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccineinargentina
AT lopezeduardo costminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccineinargentina
AT oddocristian costminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccineinargentina
AT dibarbourehugo costminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccineinargentina