Cargando…

Effectiveness and safety of CD22 and CD19 dual‐targeting chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell malignancies: A meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of CD22 or CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR‐T) cells in the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was observed. Because antigen loss and lack of CAR‐T‐cell persistence are the leading causes of progressive disease following sing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Thi Thuy, Thanh Nhu, Nguyen, Chen, Chia‐Ling, Lin, Chiou‐Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6497
_version_ 1785117156610932736
author Nguyen, Thi Thuy
Thanh Nhu, Nguyen
Chen, Chia‐Ling
Lin, Chiou‐Feng
author_facet Nguyen, Thi Thuy
Thanh Nhu, Nguyen
Chen, Chia‐Ling
Lin, Chiou‐Feng
author_sort Nguyen, Thi Thuy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy of CD22 or CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR‐T) cells in the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was observed. Because antigen loss and lack of CAR‐T‐cell persistence are the leading causes of progressive disease following single‐antigen targeting, we evaluated CD22/CD19 dual‐targeting CAR‐T‐cell therapy efficacy and safety in relapsed/refractory B‐cell malignancies. METHODS: The Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched until July 2022. Patients confirmed with any relapsed/refractory B‐cell hematological malignancies were included regardless of age, gender, or ethnicity, receiving CD22 and CD19‐dual‐targeting CAR‐T‐cell therapy. The studies conducted on patients with coexisting other cancer were excluded. We used random‐effect models to explore the outcome, and heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (405 patients) were included. The pooled overall response (OR) and complete remission (CR) were 97% and 93%, respectively, for ALL patients. The 1‐year proportions of overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were 70% and 49%, respectively. For NHL, OR occurred in 85% of patients, and 57% experienced CR. The results illustrated that the 1‐year OS and 1‐year PFS were 77% and 65%, respectively. The subgroup analysis showed that the dual‐targeting modality achieved higher CR in the following cases: coadministration of CD22/CD19‐CAR‐T cells and third‐generation CAR‐T cells combined with ASCT and BEAM pretreatment. The ALL and NHL groups seemed similar in treatment‐related toxicity: all grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS), severe CRS, and neurotoxicity occurred in 86%, 7%, and 12% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta‐analysis demonstrated that the CD22/CD19 dual‐targeting CAR‐T‐cell strategy has high efficiency with tolerable adverse effects in B‐cell malignancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10557829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105578292023-10-07 Effectiveness and safety of CD22 and CD19 dual‐targeting chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell malignancies: A meta‐analysis Nguyen, Thi Thuy Thanh Nhu, Nguyen Chen, Chia‐Ling Lin, Chiou‐Feng Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: The efficacy of CD22 or CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR‐T) cells in the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was observed. Because antigen loss and lack of CAR‐T‐cell persistence are the leading causes of progressive disease following single‐antigen targeting, we evaluated CD22/CD19 dual‐targeting CAR‐T‐cell therapy efficacy and safety in relapsed/refractory B‐cell malignancies. METHODS: The Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched until July 2022. Patients confirmed with any relapsed/refractory B‐cell hematological malignancies were included regardless of age, gender, or ethnicity, receiving CD22 and CD19‐dual‐targeting CAR‐T‐cell therapy. The studies conducted on patients with coexisting other cancer were excluded. We used random‐effect models to explore the outcome, and heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (405 patients) were included. The pooled overall response (OR) and complete remission (CR) were 97% and 93%, respectively, for ALL patients. The 1‐year proportions of overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were 70% and 49%, respectively. For NHL, OR occurred in 85% of patients, and 57% experienced CR. The results illustrated that the 1‐year OS and 1‐year PFS were 77% and 65%, respectively. The subgroup analysis showed that the dual‐targeting modality achieved higher CR in the following cases: coadministration of CD22/CD19‐CAR‐T cells and third‐generation CAR‐T cells combined with ASCT and BEAM pretreatment. The ALL and NHL groups seemed similar in treatment‐related toxicity: all grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS), severe CRS, and neurotoxicity occurred in 86%, 7%, and 12% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta‐analysis demonstrated that the CD22/CD19 dual‐targeting CAR‐T‐cell strategy has high efficiency with tolerable adverse effects in B‐cell malignancies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10557829/ /pubmed/37667978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6497 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Nguyen, Thi Thuy
Thanh Nhu, Nguyen
Chen, Chia‐Ling
Lin, Chiou‐Feng
Effectiveness and safety of CD22 and CD19 dual‐targeting chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell malignancies: A meta‐analysis
title Effectiveness and safety of CD22 and CD19 dual‐targeting chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell malignancies: A meta‐analysis
title_full Effectiveness and safety of CD22 and CD19 dual‐targeting chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell malignancies: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of CD22 and CD19 dual‐targeting chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell malignancies: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of CD22 and CD19 dual‐targeting chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell malignancies: A meta‐analysis
title_short Effectiveness and safety of CD22 and CD19 dual‐targeting chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell malignancies: A meta‐analysis
title_sort effectiveness and safety of cd22 and cd19 dual‐targeting chimeric antigen receptor t‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory b‐cell malignancies: a meta‐analysis
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6497
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenthithuy effectivenessandsafetyofcd22andcd19dualtargetingchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorybcellmalignanciesametaanalysis
AT thanhnhunguyen effectivenessandsafetyofcd22andcd19dualtargetingchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorybcellmalignanciesametaanalysis
AT chenchialing effectivenessandsafetyofcd22andcd19dualtargetingchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorybcellmalignanciesametaanalysis
AT linchioufeng effectivenessandsafetyofcd22andcd19dualtargetingchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorybcellmalignanciesametaanalysis