Cargando…
The digital divide: Racial disparities in adoption and utilization of health information technology among patients with lymphoid cancers
INTRODUCTION: Health information technology (HIT) has the potential to improve healthcare delivery and engagement. Studying racial‐ethnic disparities in HIT engagement will help understand and overcome challenges to healthcare utilization. METHODS: We undertook a patient‐reported survey among patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37587868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6454 |
_version_ | 1785117159770292224 |
---|---|
author | Ailawadhi, Sikander Ailawadhi, Meghna Dutta, Navnita Parrondo, Ricardo D. Roy, Vivek Sher, Taimur Baksh, Mizba Rasheed, Ahsan Das, Saurav Fernandez, Andre J. Paulus, Aneel Chanan‐Khan, Asher A. |
author_facet | Ailawadhi, Sikander Ailawadhi, Meghna Dutta, Navnita Parrondo, Ricardo D. Roy, Vivek Sher, Taimur Baksh, Mizba Rasheed, Ahsan Das, Saurav Fernandez, Andre J. Paulus, Aneel Chanan‐Khan, Asher A. |
author_sort | Ailawadhi, Sikander |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Health information technology (HIT) has the potential to improve healthcare delivery and engagement. Studying racial‐ethnic disparities in HIT engagement will help understand and overcome challenges to healthcare utilization. METHODS: We undertook a patient‐reported survey among patients with lymphoid malignancies at two campuses of Mayo Clinic, Florida to explore HIT‐related disparities. Variables between Whites and non‐Whites, and non‐Whites from the two campuses were compared. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1004 respondents, with 71% whites, 27% non‐Whites (race‐ethnicity not reported by 2%). Non‐Whites included 30% responders at the main campus and 64% at an inner‐city campus. Whites were significantly older and had higher education, while non‐Whites had lesser access to a computer. Only 51% of non‐Whites were registered to use electronic medical records (EMR) as compared to 72% Whites (p < 0.001) and significantly lesser number of non‐Whites even knew that EMR existed (81% vs. 92%, p < 0.001). Encouragingly, a higher number of non‐Whites wanted to engage in EMR. Non‐Whites from the main campus were older, more educated and had more access to a computer as compared to those from the inner‐city campus. Similar disparate factors were noted among minorities from the two campuses, suggesting impact of socioeconomic backgrounds on EMR usage among non‐Whites. Linguistic barriers were more striking among inner‐city campus non‐Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Non‐Whites continue to struggle with suboptimal utilization of the healthcare system and barriers related to integration in HIT, including disparities representing socioeconomic differences. Efforts need to be made at several levels to help racial‐ethnic minorities overcome awareness, access, and linguistic barriers to HIT utilization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10557846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105578462023-10-07 The digital divide: Racial disparities in adoption and utilization of health information technology among patients with lymphoid cancers Ailawadhi, Sikander Ailawadhi, Meghna Dutta, Navnita Parrondo, Ricardo D. Roy, Vivek Sher, Taimur Baksh, Mizba Rasheed, Ahsan Das, Saurav Fernandez, Andre J. Paulus, Aneel Chanan‐Khan, Asher A. Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES INTRODUCTION: Health information technology (HIT) has the potential to improve healthcare delivery and engagement. Studying racial‐ethnic disparities in HIT engagement will help understand and overcome challenges to healthcare utilization. METHODS: We undertook a patient‐reported survey among patients with lymphoid malignancies at two campuses of Mayo Clinic, Florida to explore HIT‐related disparities. Variables between Whites and non‐Whites, and non‐Whites from the two campuses were compared. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1004 respondents, with 71% whites, 27% non‐Whites (race‐ethnicity not reported by 2%). Non‐Whites included 30% responders at the main campus and 64% at an inner‐city campus. Whites were significantly older and had higher education, while non‐Whites had lesser access to a computer. Only 51% of non‐Whites were registered to use electronic medical records (EMR) as compared to 72% Whites (p < 0.001) and significantly lesser number of non‐Whites even knew that EMR existed (81% vs. 92%, p < 0.001). Encouragingly, a higher number of non‐Whites wanted to engage in EMR. Non‐Whites from the main campus were older, more educated and had more access to a computer as compared to those from the inner‐city campus. Similar disparate factors were noted among minorities from the two campuses, suggesting impact of socioeconomic backgrounds on EMR usage among non‐Whites. Linguistic barriers were more striking among inner‐city campus non‐Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Non‐Whites continue to struggle with suboptimal utilization of the healthcare system and barriers related to integration in HIT, including disparities representing socioeconomic differences. Efforts need to be made at several levels to help racial‐ethnic minorities overcome awareness, access, and linguistic barriers to HIT utilization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10557846/ /pubmed/37587868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6454 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Ailawadhi, Sikander Ailawadhi, Meghna Dutta, Navnita Parrondo, Ricardo D. Roy, Vivek Sher, Taimur Baksh, Mizba Rasheed, Ahsan Das, Saurav Fernandez, Andre J. Paulus, Aneel Chanan‐Khan, Asher A. The digital divide: Racial disparities in adoption and utilization of health information technology among patients with lymphoid cancers |
title | The digital divide: Racial disparities in adoption and utilization of health information technology among patients with lymphoid cancers |
title_full | The digital divide: Racial disparities in adoption and utilization of health information technology among patients with lymphoid cancers |
title_fullStr | The digital divide: Racial disparities in adoption and utilization of health information technology among patients with lymphoid cancers |
title_full_unstemmed | The digital divide: Racial disparities in adoption and utilization of health information technology among patients with lymphoid cancers |
title_short | The digital divide: Racial disparities in adoption and utilization of health information technology among patients with lymphoid cancers |
title_sort | digital divide: racial disparities in adoption and utilization of health information technology among patients with lymphoid cancers |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37587868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ailawadhisikander thedigitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT ailawadhimeghna thedigitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT duttanavnita thedigitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT parrondoricardod thedigitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT royvivek thedigitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT shertaimur thedigitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT bakshmizba thedigitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT rasheedahsan thedigitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT dassaurav thedigitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT fernandezandrej thedigitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT paulusaneel thedigitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT chanankhanashera thedigitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT ailawadhisikander digitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT ailawadhimeghna digitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT duttanavnita digitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT parrondoricardod digitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT royvivek digitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT shertaimur digitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT bakshmizba digitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT rasheedahsan digitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT dassaurav digitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT fernandezandrej digitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT paulusaneel digitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers AT chanankhanashera digitaldivideracialdisparitiesinadoptionandutilizationofhealthinformationtechnologyamongpatientswithlymphoidcancers |