Cargando…
Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in community oncology practices
BACKGROUND: Sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection in community oncology practices is critical to identify and address cancer inequities, but less than 20% of NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP)‐affiliated practices regularly collect SOGI data despite widespread re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37732470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6517 |
_version_ | 1785117167226716160 |
---|---|
author | Mullins, Megan A. Reber, Lisa Washington, Ariel Stasenko, Marina Rankin, Aaron Friese, Christopher R. Cooley, Mary E. Hudson, Matthew F. Wallner, Lauren P. |
author_facet | Mullins, Megan A. Reber, Lisa Washington, Ariel Stasenko, Marina Rankin, Aaron Friese, Christopher R. Cooley, Mary E. Hudson, Matthew F. Wallner, Lauren P. |
author_sort | Mullins, Megan A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection in community oncology practices is critical to identify and address cancer inequities, but less than 20% of NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP)‐affiliated practices regularly collect SOGI data despite widespread recommendations. We evaluated multilevel barriers and facilitators for SOGI data collection at NCORP practices. METHODS: We conducted 14 semi‐structured interviews at seven purposefully sampled NCORP oncology practices. We interviewed one clinician (oncologist, advanced practice provider) and one clinic staff member per practice. Thematic analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was conducted to identify barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: Thematic saturation occurred after interviews at six practices and was confirmed with interviews at an additional practice. Participants highlighted multilevel barriers including low levels of understanding, information technology infrastructure, and perceived low relative priority. Not understanding the role of SOGI data in oncology care contributed to cis‐heteronormative culture. At the clinic level, this culture coincided with a lack of processes and policies for collecting SOGI from all patients. At the care team level, perceived irrelevance to oncology care was related to discomfort asking SOGI, fear of patient discomfort, and limited awareness of SOGI in electronic health records. Suggested solutions included: normalizing asking SOGI questions, giving patients privacy to complete SOGI, and clarifying clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS: SOGI data collection barriers stemmed from perceptions that SOGI disclosure does not influence care quality. Oncology teams may benefit from training on culturally sensitive SOGI collection, education on SOGI data relevance to oncology practices, and support for implementing SOGI data collection policies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10557876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105578762023-10-07 Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in community oncology practices Mullins, Megan A. Reber, Lisa Washington, Ariel Stasenko, Marina Rankin, Aaron Friese, Christopher R. Cooley, Mary E. Hudson, Matthew F. Wallner, Lauren P. Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection in community oncology practices is critical to identify and address cancer inequities, but less than 20% of NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP)‐affiliated practices regularly collect SOGI data despite widespread recommendations. We evaluated multilevel barriers and facilitators for SOGI data collection at NCORP practices. METHODS: We conducted 14 semi‐structured interviews at seven purposefully sampled NCORP oncology practices. We interviewed one clinician (oncologist, advanced practice provider) and one clinic staff member per practice. Thematic analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was conducted to identify barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: Thematic saturation occurred after interviews at six practices and was confirmed with interviews at an additional practice. Participants highlighted multilevel barriers including low levels of understanding, information technology infrastructure, and perceived low relative priority. Not understanding the role of SOGI data in oncology care contributed to cis‐heteronormative culture. At the clinic level, this culture coincided with a lack of processes and policies for collecting SOGI from all patients. At the care team level, perceived irrelevance to oncology care was related to discomfort asking SOGI, fear of patient discomfort, and limited awareness of SOGI in electronic health records. Suggested solutions included: normalizing asking SOGI questions, giving patients privacy to complete SOGI, and clarifying clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS: SOGI data collection barriers stemmed from perceptions that SOGI disclosure does not influence care quality. Oncology teams may benefit from training on culturally sensitive SOGI collection, education on SOGI data relevance to oncology practices, and support for implementing SOGI data collection policies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10557876/ /pubmed/37732470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6517 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Mullins, Megan A. Reber, Lisa Washington, Ariel Stasenko, Marina Rankin, Aaron Friese, Christopher R. Cooley, Mary E. Hudson, Matthew F. Wallner, Lauren P. Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in community oncology practices |
title | Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in community oncology practices |
title_full | Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in community oncology practices |
title_fullStr | Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in community oncology practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in community oncology practices |
title_short | Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in community oncology practices |
title_sort | barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in community oncology practices |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37732470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullinsmegana barriersfacilitatorsandrecommendationsforsexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectionincommunityoncologypractices AT reberlisa barriersfacilitatorsandrecommendationsforsexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectionincommunityoncologypractices AT washingtonariel barriersfacilitatorsandrecommendationsforsexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectionincommunityoncologypractices AT stasenkomarina barriersfacilitatorsandrecommendationsforsexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectionincommunityoncologypractices AT rankinaaron barriersfacilitatorsandrecommendationsforsexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectionincommunityoncologypractices AT friesechristopherr barriersfacilitatorsandrecommendationsforsexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectionincommunityoncologypractices AT cooleymarye barriersfacilitatorsandrecommendationsforsexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectionincommunityoncologypractices AT hudsonmatthewf barriersfacilitatorsandrecommendationsforsexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectionincommunityoncologypractices AT wallnerlaurenp barriersfacilitatorsandrecommendationsforsexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectionincommunityoncologypractices |