Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor therapy: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutated who progressed on EGFR tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor (EGFR‐TKI) therapy have limited therapeutic options. There is still no consensus on the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in NS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhen, Zhou, Fang, Xu, Shan, Wang, Kang, Ding, Huan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37584242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6453
_version_ 1785117171266879488
author Wang, Zhen
Zhou, Fang
Xu, Shan
Wang, Kang
Ding, Huan
author_facet Wang, Zhen
Zhou, Fang
Xu, Shan
Wang, Kang
Ding, Huan
author_sort Wang, Zhen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutated who progressed on EGFR tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor (EGFR‐TKI) therapy have limited therapeutic options. There is still no consensus on the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in NSCLC with EGFR mutations. METHODS: We did a network meta‐analysis (NMA) with a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library. We included all phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non‐randomized controlled trials (Non‐RCTs), and retrospective studies. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed through hazard ratios (HR). Objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) were assessed through odds ratio (OR) and relative risk (RR), respectively. R software was used to compare the outcomes of different treatments by Bayesian NMA. FINDINGS: We identified 1835 published results and 17 studies were included ultimately. A total of 2085 patients were included and accepted the following six treatments: ICIs plus chemotherapy (ICIs+Chemo), chemotherapy (Chemo), ICIs monotherapy (ICIs), ICIs plus chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy (ICIs+Chemo+Antiangio), antiangiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy (Antiangio+Chemo), ICIs plus antiangiogenic therapy (ICIs+Antiangio). ICIs+Chemo+Antiangio was associated with longer PFS and OS, as well as higher ORR (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 96%, 90%, 91%). ICIs conferred the safety profile in terms of any‐grade AEs, grade greater than or equal to 3 AEs and any grade leading to treatment discontinuation occurred AEs (SUCRA, 99%, 68%, 94%). INTERPRETATION: ICIs+Chemo+Antiangio brings the greatest survival benefit in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations who progressed on EGFR‐TKI therapy, even for whom with baseline brain metastases. Compared with chemotherapy, ICIs has a low incidence of AEs and a benefit in OS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10557893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105578932023-10-07 The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor therapy: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis Wang, Zhen Zhou, Fang Xu, Shan Wang, Kang Ding, Huan Cancer Med REVIEW BACKGROUND: Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutated who progressed on EGFR tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor (EGFR‐TKI) therapy have limited therapeutic options. There is still no consensus on the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in NSCLC with EGFR mutations. METHODS: We did a network meta‐analysis (NMA) with a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library. We included all phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non‐randomized controlled trials (Non‐RCTs), and retrospective studies. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed through hazard ratios (HR). Objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) were assessed through odds ratio (OR) and relative risk (RR), respectively. R software was used to compare the outcomes of different treatments by Bayesian NMA. FINDINGS: We identified 1835 published results and 17 studies were included ultimately. A total of 2085 patients were included and accepted the following six treatments: ICIs plus chemotherapy (ICIs+Chemo), chemotherapy (Chemo), ICIs monotherapy (ICIs), ICIs plus chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy (ICIs+Chemo+Antiangio), antiangiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy (Antiangio+Chemo), ICIs plus antiangiogenic therapy (ICIs+Antiangio). ICIs+Chemo+Antiangio was associated with longer PFS and OS, as well as higher ORR (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 96%, 90%, 91%). ICIs conferred the safety profile in terms of any‐grade AEs, grade greater than or equal to 3 AEs and any grade leading to treatment discontinuation occurred AEs (SUCRA, 99%, 68%, 94%). INTERPRETATION: ICIs+Chemo+Antiangio brings the greatest survival benefit in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations who progressed on EGFR‐TKI therapy, even for whom with baseline brain metastases. Compared with chemotherapy, ICIs has a low incidence of AEs and a benefit in OS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10557893/ /pubmed/37584242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6453 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle REVIEW
Wang, Zhen
Zhou, Fang
Xu, Shan
Wang, Kang
Ding, Huan
The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor therapy: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor therapy: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_full The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor therapy: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor therapy: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor therapy: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_short The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor therapy: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with egfr‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer who progressed on egfr tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor therapy: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
topic REVIEW
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37584242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6453
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhen theefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithegfrmutatednonsmallcelllungcancerwhoprogressedonegfrtyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhoufang theefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithegfrmutatednonsmallcelllungcancerwhoprogressedonegfrtyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT xushan theefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithegfrmutatednonsmallcelllungcancerwhoprogressedonegfrtyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangkang theefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithegfrmutatednonsmallcelllungcancerwhoprogressedonegfrtyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT dinghuan theefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithegfrmutatednonsmallcelllungcancerwhoprogressedonegfrtyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangzhen efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithegfrmutatednonsmallcelllungcancerwhoprogressedonegfrtyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhoufang efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithegfrmutatednonsmallcelllungcancerwhoprogressedonegfrtyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT xushan efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithegfrmutatednonsmallcelllungcancerwhoprogressedonegfrtyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangkang efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithegfrmutatednonsmallcelllungcancerwhoprogressedonegfrtyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT dinghuan efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithegfrmutatednonsmallcelllungcancerwhoprogressedonegfrtyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis