Cargando…

Integrating Equity Into Bicycle Infrastructure, Planning, and Programming: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Implementation Among Participants in the Bicycle Friendly Community Program

INTRODUCTION: Integrating equity considerations into bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming is essential to increase bicycling and reduce physical inactivity–related health disparities. However, little is known about communities’ experiences with activities that promote equity considerati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lemon, Stephenie C., Neptune, Amelia, Goulding, Melissa, Pendharkar, Jyothi Ananth, Dugger, Roddrick, Chriqui, Jamie F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37797289
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd20.230119
_version_ 1785117187143368704
author Lemon, Stephenie C.
Neptune, Amelia
Goulding, Melissa
Pendharkar, Jyothi Ananth
Dugger, Roddrick
Chriqui, Jamie F.
author_facet Lemon, Stephenie C.
Neptune, Amelia
Goulding, Melissa
Pendharkar, Jyothi Ananth
Dugger, Roddrick
Chriqui, Jamie F.
author_sort Lemon, Stephenie C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Integrating equity considerations into bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming is essential to increase bicycling and reduce physical inactivity–related health disparities. However, little is known about communities’ experiences with activities that promote equity considerations in bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming or about barriers and facilitators to such considerations. The objective of this project was to gain in-depth understanding of the experiences, barriers, and facilitators that communities encounter with integrating equity considerations into bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming. METHODS: We administered a web-based survey in 2022 to assess communities’ experiences with 31 equity-focused activities in 3 areas: 1) community engagement, education, events, and programming (community engagement); 2) data collection, evaluation, and goal setting (data); and 3) infrastructure, facilities, and physical amenities (infrastructure). Respondents were people who represented communities in the US that participated in the League of American Bicyclists’ Bicycle Friendly Community (BFC) Program. We then conducted 6 focus groups with a subset of survey respondents to explore barriers and facilitators to implementing equity-focused activities. RESULTS: Survey respondents (N = 194) had experience with a mean (SD) of 5.9 (5.7) equity-focused activities. Focus group participants (N = 30) identified themes related to community engagement (outreach to and engagement of underrepresented communities, cultural perceptions of bicycling, and funding and support for community rides and programs); data (locally relevant data); and infrastructure (political will, community design, and infrastructure). They described barriers and facilitators for each. CONCLUSION: Communities are challenged with integrating equity into bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming. Multicomponent strategies with support from entities such as the BFC program will be required to make progress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10557976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105579762023-10-07 Integrating Equity Into Bicycle Infrastructure, Planning, and Programming: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Implementation Among Participants in the Bicycle Friendly Community Program Lemon, Stephenie C. Neptune, Amelia Goulding, Melissa Pendharkar, Jyothi Ananth Dugger, Roddrick Chriqui, Jamie F. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Integrating equity considerations into bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming is essential to increase bicycling and reduce physical inactivity–related health disparities. However, little is known about communities’ experiences with activities that promote equity considerations in bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming or about barriers and facilitators to such considerations. The objective of this project was to gain in-depth understanding of the experiences, barriers, and facilitators that communities encounter with integrating equity considerations into bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming. METHODS: We administered a web-based survey in 2022 to assess communities’ experiences with 31 equity-focused activities in 3 areas: 1) community engagement, education, events, and programming (community engagement); 2) data collection, evaluation, and goal setting (data); and 3) infrastructure, facilities, and physical amenities (infrastructure). Respondents were people who represented communities in the US that participated in the League of American Bicyclists’ Bicycle Friendly Community (BFC) Program. We then conducted 6 focus groups with a subset of survey respondents to explore barriers and facilitators to implementing equity-focused activities. RESULTS: Survey respondents (N = 194) had experience with a mean (SD) of 5.9 (5.7) equity-focused activities. Focus group participants (N = 30) identified themes related to community engagement (outreach to and engagement of underrepresented communities, cultural perceptions of bicycling, and funding and support for community rides and programs); data (locally relevant data); and infrastructure (political will, community design, and infrastructure). They described barriers and facilitators for each. CONCLUSION: Communities are challenged with integrating equity into bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming. Multicomponent strategies with support from entities such as the BFC program will be required to make progress. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10557976/ /pubmed/37797289 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd20.230119 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Preventing Chronic Disease is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lemon, Stephenie C.
Neptune, Amelia
Goulding, Melissa
Pendharkar, Jyothi Ananth
Dugger, Roddrick
Chriqui, Jamie F.
Integrating Equity Into Bicycle Infrastructure, Planning, and Programming: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Implementation Among Participants in the Bicycle Friendly Community Program
title Integrating Equity Into Bicycle Infrastructure, Planning, and Programming: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Implementation Among Participants in the Bicycle Friendly Community Program
title_full Integrating Equity Into Bicycle Infrastructure, Planning, and Programming: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Implementation Among Participants in the Bicycle Friendly Community Program
title_fullStr Integrating Equity Into Bicycle Infrastructure, Planning, and Programming: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Implementation Among Participants in the Bicycle Friendly Community Program
title_full_unstemmed Integrating Equity Into Bicycle Infrastructure, Planning, and Programming: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Implementation Among Participants in the Bicycle Friendly Community Program
title_short Integrating Equity Into Bicycle Infrastructure, Planning, and Programming: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Implementation Among Participants in the Bicycle Friendly Community Program
title_sort integrating equity into bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming: a mixed methods exploration of implementation among participants in the bicycle friendly community program
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10557976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37797289
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd20.230119
work_keys_str_mv AT lemonstepheniec integratingequityintobicycleinfrastructureplanningandprogrammingamixedmethodsexplorationofimplementationamongparticipantsinthebicyclefriendlycommunityprogram
AT neptuneamelia integratingequityintobicycleinfrastructureplanningandprogrammingamixedmethodsexplorationofimplementationamongparticipantsinthebicyclefriendlycommunityprogram
AT gouldingmelissa integratingequityintobicycleinfrastructureplanningandprogrammingamixedmethodsexplorationofimplementationamongparticipantsinthebicyclefriendlycommunityprogram
AT pendharkarjyothiananth integratingequityintobicycleinfrastructureplanningandprogrammingamixedmethodsexplorationofimplementationamongparticipantsinthebicyclefriendlycommunityprogram
AT duggerroddrick integratingequityintobicycleinfrastructureplanningandprogrammingamixedmethodsexplorationofimplementationamongparticipantsinthebicyclefriendlycommunityprogram
AT chriquijamief integratingequityintobicycleinfrastructureplanningandprogrammingamixedmethodsexplorationofimplementationamongparticipantsinthebicyclefriendlycommunityprogram