Cargando…

ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort

Background and study aims As life expectancy increases worldwide, so does the prevalence of biliary tract and pancreatic disorders, resulting in rising demand for invasive procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the elderly. Few studies have assessed the safety of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colmenero Gargari, Ana E, Melgar Somoza, Fernando E, Vera, Jorge, Micames, Carlos G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2153-7094
_version_ 1785117234041978880
author Colmenero Gargari, Ana E
Melgar Somoza, Fernando E
Vera, Jorge
Micames, Carlos G
author_facet Colmenero Gargari, Ana E
Melgar Somoza, Fernando E
Vera, Jorge
Micames, Carlos G
author_sort Colmenero Gargari, Ana E
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims As life expectancy increases worldwide, so does the prevalence of biliary tract and pancreatic disorders, resulting in rising demand for invasive procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the elderly. Few studies have assessed the safety of ERCP in patients 90 years and older, particularly among the Hispanic population. The primary aim of this study was to determine the technical success and adverse events (AEs) associated with ERCP in patients 90 years of age or older in comparison to a younger cohort of patients. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis of all ERCPs done at our institution from 2012 to 2018 was performed. Three hundred ERCPs in patients < 90 years old and all 28 ERCPs done in patients ≥ 90 years old were included in the analysis. Results ERCPs were successfully completed in 96.4% of patients > 90 years old and 96.3% of the < 90-year-old cohort (realtive risk [RR] 1.00, confidence interval 0.92-1.07). There was no difference in the rate of periprocedural AEs. Post-ERCP AEs occurred in 7.1% and 3.0% in patients aged < 90 and > 90 years, respectively (RR 2.38, 0.54-10.48). No deaths were directly attributed to the procedure; however, inpatient mortality was higher in the group aged > 90 years. Conclusions ERCP is safe and effective in nonagenarian patients, and advanced age should not be considered an independent risk factor for AEs nor a contraindication for the procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10558256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105582562023-10-07 ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort Colmenero Gargari, Ana E Melgar Somoza, Fernando E Vera, Jorge Micames, Carlos G Endosc Int Open Background and study aims As life expectancy increases worldwide, so does the prevalence of biliary tract and pancreatic disorders, resulting in rising demand for invasive procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the elderly. Few studies have assessed the safety of ERCP in patients 90 years and older, particularly among the Hispanic population. The primary aim of this study was to determine the technical success and adverse events (AEs) associated with ERCP in patients 90 years of age or older in comparison to a younger cohort of patients. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis of all ERCPs done at our institution from 2012 to 2018 was performed. Three hundred ERCPs in patients < 90 years old and all 28 ERCPs done in patients ≥ 90 years old were included in the analysis. Results ERCPs were successfully completed in 96.4% of patients > 90 years old and 96.3% of the < 90-year-old cohort (realtive risk [RR] 1.00, confidence interval 0.92-1.07). There was no difference in the rate of periprocedural AEs. Post-ERCP AEs occurred in 7.1% and 3.0% in patients aged < 90 and > 90 years, respectively (RR 2.38, 0.54-10.48). No deaths were directly attributed to the procedure; however, inpatient mortality was higher in the group aged > 90 years. Conclusions ERCP is safe and effective in nonagenarian patients, and advanced age should not be considered an independent risk factor for AEs nor a contraindication for the procedure. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10558256/ /pubmed/37810900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2153-7094 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Colmenero Gargari, Ana E
Melgar Somoza, Fernando E
Vera, Jorge
Micames, Carlos G
ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort
title ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort
title_full ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort
title_fullStr ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort
title_full_unstemmed ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort
title_short ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort
title_sort ercp in patients over 90 years old: safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2153-7094
work_keys_str_mv AT colmenerogargarianae ercpinpatientsover90yearsoldsafetyandefficacycomparisonwithayoungercohort
AT melgarsomozafernandoe ercpinpatientsover90yearsoldsafetyandefficacycomparisonwithayoungercohort
AT verajorge ercpinpatientsover90yearsoldsafetyandefficacycomparisonwithayoungercohort
AT micamescarlosg ercpinpatientsover90yearsoldsafetyandefficacycomparisonwithayoungercohort