Cargando…
ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort
Background and study aims As life expectancy increases worldwide, so does the prevalence of biliary tract and pancreatic disorders, resulting in rising demand for invasive procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the elderly. Few studies have assessed the safety of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2153-7094 |
_version_ | 1785117234041978880 |
---|---|
author | Colmenero Gargari, Ana E Melgar Somoza, Fernando E Vera, Jorge Micames, Carlos G |
author_facet | Colmenero Gargari, Ana E Melgar Somoza, Fernando E Vera, Jorge Micames, Carlos G |
author_sort | Colmenero Gargari, Ana E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims As life expectancy increases worldwide, so does the prevalence of biliary tract and pancreatic disorders, resulting in rising demand for invasive procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the elderly. Few studies have assessed the safety of ERCP in patients 90 years and older, particularly among the Hispanic population. The primary aim of this study was to determine the technical success and adverse events (AEs) associated with ERCP in patients 90 years of age or older in comparison to a younger cohort of patients. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis of all ERCPs done at our institution from 2012 to 2018 was performed. Three hundred ERCPs in patients < 90 years old and all 28 ERCPs done in patients ≥ 90 years old were included in the analysis. Results ERCPs were successfully completed in 96.4% of patients > 90 years old and 96.3% of the < 90-year-old cohort (realtive risk [RR] 1.00, confidence interval 0.92-1.07). There was no difference in the rate of periprocedural AEs. Post-ERCP AEs occurred in 7.1% and 3.0% in patients aged < 90 and > 90 years, respectively (RR 2.38, 0.54-10.48). No deaths were directly attributed to the procedure; however, inpatient mortality was higher in the group aged > 90 years. Conclusions ERCP is safe and effective in nonagenarian patients, and advanced age should not be considered an independent risk factor for AEs nor a contraindication for the procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10558256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105582562023-10-07 ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort Colmenero Gargari, Ana E Melgar Somoza, Fernando E Vera, Jorge Micames, Carlos G Endosc Int Open Background and study aims As life expectancy increases worldwide, so does the prevalence of biliary tract and pancreatic disorders, resulting in rising demand for invasive procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the elderly. Few studies have assessed the safety of ERCP in patients 90 years and older, particularly among the Hispanic population. The primary aim of this study was to determine the technical success and adverse events (AEs) associated with ERCP in patients 90 years of age or older in comparison to a younger cohort of patients. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis of all ERCPs done at our institution from 2012 to 2018 was performed. Three hundred ERCPs in patients < 90 years old and all 28 ERCPs done in patients ≥ 90 years old were included in the analysis. Results ERCPs were successfully completed in 96.4% of patients > 90 years old and 96.3% of the < 90-year-old cohort (realtive risk [RR] 1.00, confidence interval 0.92-1.07). There was no difference in the rate of periprocedural AEs. Post-ERCP AEs occurred in 7.1% and 3.0% in patients aged < 90 and > 90 years, respectively (RR 2.38, 0.54-10.48). No deaths were directly attributed to the procedure; however, inpatient mortality was higher in the group aged > 90 years. Conclusions ERCP is safe and effective in nonagenarian patients, and advanced age should not be considered an independent risk factor for AEs nor a contraindication for the procedure. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10558256/ /pubmed/37810900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2153-7094 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Colmenero Gargari, Ana E Melgar Somoza, Fernando E Vera, Jorge Micames, Carlos G ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort |
title | ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort |
title_full | ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort |
title_fullStr | ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort |
title_short | ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort |
title_sort | ercp in patients over 90 years old: safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2153-7094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT colmenerogargarianae ercpinpatientsover90yearsoldsafetyandefficacycomparisonwithayoungercohort AT melgarsomozafernandoe ercpinpatientsover90yearsoldsafetyandefficacycomparisonwithayoungercohort AT verajorge ercpinpatientsover90yearsoldsafetyandefficacycomparisonwithayoungercohort AT micamescarlosg ercpinpatientsover90yearsoldsafetyandefficacycomparisonwithayoungercohort |