Cargando…

Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation

BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation modality for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablating myocardium by electroporation without tissue-heating. With its different mechanism of tissue ablation, it is assumed that lesion creation is divergent to thermal energy sources. (68)Ga-fibrobla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kupusovic, Jana, Kessler, Lukas, Bruns, Florian, Bohnen, Jan-Eric, Nekolla, Stephan G., Weber, Manuel M., Lauenroth, Anna, Rattka, Manuel, Hermann, Ken, Dobrev, Dobromir, Rassaf, Tienush, Wakili, Reza, Rischpler, Christoph, Siebermair, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36944827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03220-8
_version_ 1785117260023595008
author Kupusovic, Jana
Kessler, Lukas
Bruns, Florian
Bohnen, Jan-Eric
Nekolla, Stephan G.
Weber, Manuel M.
Lauenroth, Anna
Rattka, Manuel
Hermann, Ken
Dobrev, Dobromir
Rassaf, Tienush
Wakili, Reza
Rischpler, Christoph
Siebermair, Johannes
author_facet Kupusovic, Jana
Kessler, Lukas
Bruns, Florian
Bohnen, Jan-Eric
Nekolla, Stephan G.
Weber, Manuel M.
Lauenroth, Anna
Rattka, Manuel
Hermann, Ken
Dobrev, Dobromir
Rassaf, Tienush
Wakili, Reza
Rischpler, Christoph
Siebermair, Johannes
author_sort Kupusovic, Jana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation modality for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablating myocardium by electroporation without tissue-heating. With its different mechanism of tissue ablation, it is assumed that lesion creation is divergent to thermal energy sources. (68)Ga-fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT targets FAP-alpha expressed by activated fibroblasts. We aimed to assess (68)Ga-FAPI uptake in pulmonary veins as surrogate for ablation damage after PFA and cryoballoon ablation (CBA). METHODS: 26 patients (15 PFA, 11 CBA) underwent (68)Ga-FAPI-PET/CT after ablation. Standardized uptake values (SUV) and fibroblast-activation volumes of localized tracer uptake were assessed. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. In PFA, focal FAPI uptake was only observed in 3/15 (20%) patients, whereas in the CBA cohort, 10/11 (90.9%) patients showed atrial visual uptake. We observed lower values of SUV(max) (2.85 ± 0.56 vs 4.71 ± 2.06, P = 0.025) and FAV (1.13 ± 0.84 cm(3) vs 3.91 ± 2.74 cm(3), P = 0.014) along with a trend towards lower SUV(peak) and SUV(mean) in PFA vs CBA patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tissue response with respect to fibroblast activation seems to be less pronounced in PFA compared to established thermal ablation systems. This functional assessment might contribute to a better understanding of lesion formation in thermal and PFA ablation potentially contributing to better safety outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-023-03220-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10558367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105583672023-10-08 Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation Kupusovic, Jana Kessler, Lukas Bruns, Florian Bohnen, Jan-Eric Nekolla, Stephan G. Weber, Manuel M. Lauenroth, Anna Rattka, Manuel Hermann, Ken Dobrev, Dobromir Rassaf, Tienush Wakili, Reza Rischpler, Christoph Siebermair, Johannes J Nucl Cardiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation modality for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablating myocardium by electroporation without tissue-heating. With its different mechanism of tissue ablation, it is assumed that lesion creation is divergent to thermal energy sources. (68)Ga-fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT targets FAP-alpha expressed by activated fibroblasts. We aimed to assess (68)Ga-FAPI uptake in pulmonary veins as surrogate for ablation damage after PFA and cryoballoon ablation (CBA). METHODS: 26 patients (15 PFA, 11 CBA) underwent (68)Ga-FAPI-PET/CT after ablation. Standardized uptake values (SUV) and fibroblast-activation volumes of localized tracer uptake were assessed. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. In PFA, focal FAPI uptake was only observed in 3/15 (20%) patients, whereas in the CBA cohort, 10/11 (90.9%) patients showed atrial visual uptake. We observed lower values of SUV(max) (2.85 ± 0.56 vs 4.71 ± 2.06, P = 0.025) and FAV (1.13 ± 0.84 cm(3) vs 3.91 ± 2.74 cm(3), P = 0.014) along with a trend towards lower SUV(peak) and SUV(mean) in PFA vs CBA patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tissue response with respect to fibroblast activation seems to be less pronounced in PFA compared to established thermal ablation systems. This functional assessment might contribute to a better understanding of lesion formation in thermal and PFA ablation potentially contributing to better safety outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-023-03220-8. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10558367/ /pubmed/36944827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03220-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kupusovic, Jana
Kessler, Lukas
Bruns, Florian
Bohnen, Jan-Eric
Nekolla, Stephan G.
Weber, Manuel M.
Lauenroth, Anna
Rattka, Manuel
Hermann, Ken
Dobrev, Dobromir
Rassaf, Tienush
Wakili, Reza
Rischpler, Christoph
Siebermair, Johannes
Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation
title Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation
title_full Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation
title_fullStr Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation
title_full_unstemmed Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation
title_short Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation
title_sort visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)ga-fapi pet/ct after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36944827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03220-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kupusovicjana visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT kesslerlukas visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT brunsflorian visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT bohnenjaneric visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT nekollastephang visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT webermanuelm visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT lauenrothanna visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT rattkamanuel visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT hermannken visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT dobrevdobromir visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT rassaftienush visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT wakilireza visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT rischplerchristoph visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation
AT siebermairjohannes visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation