Cargando…
Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation
BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation modality for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablating myocardium by electroporation without tissue-heating. With its different mechanism of tissue ablation, it is assumed that lesion creation is divergent to thermal energy sources. (68)Ga-fibrobla...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36944827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03220-8 |
_version_ | 1785117260023595008 |
---|---|
author | Kupusovic, Jana Kessler, Lukas Bruns, Florian Bohnen, Jan-Eric Nekolla, Stephan G. Weber, Manuel M. Lauenroth, Anna Rattka, Manuel Hermann, Ken Dobrev, Dobromir Rassaf, Tienush Wakili, Reza Rischpler, Christoph Siebermair, Johannes |
author_facet | Kupusovic, Jana Kessler, Lukas Bruns, Florian Bohnen, Jan-Eric Nekolla, Stephan G. Weber, Manuel M. Lauenroth, Anna Rattka, Manuel Hermann, Ken Dobrev, Dobromir Rassaf, Tienush Wakili, Reza Rischpler, Christoph Siebermair, Johannes |
author_sort | Kupusovic, Jana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation modality for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablating myocardium by electroporation without tissue-heating. With its different mechanism of tissue ablation, it is assumed that lesion creation is divergent to thermal energy sources. (68)Ga-fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT targets FAP-alpha expressed by activated fibroblasts. We aimed to assess (68)Ga-FAPI uptake in pulmonary veins as surrogate for ablation damage after PFA and cryoballoon ablation (CBA). METHODS: 26 patients (15 PFA, 11 CBA) underwent (68)Ga-FAPI-PET/CT after ablation. Standardized uptake values (SUV) and fibroblast-activation volumes of localized tracer uptake were assessed. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. In PFA, focal FAPI uptake was only observed in 3/15 (20%) patients, whereas in the CBA cohort, 10/11 (90.9%) patients showed atrial visual uptake. We observed lower values of SUV(max) (2.85 ± 0.56 vs 4.71 ± 2.06, P = 0.025) and FAV (1.13 ± 0.84 cm(3) vs 3.91 ± 2.74 cm(3), P = 0.014) along with a trend towards lower SUV(peak) and SUV(mean) in PFA vs CBA patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tissue response with respect to fibroblast activation seems to be less pronounced in PFA compared to established thermal ablation systems. This functional assessment might contribute to a better understanding of lesion formation in thermal and PFA ablation potentially contributing to better safety outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-023-03220-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10558367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105583672023-10-08 Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation Kupusovic, Jana Kessler, Lukas Bruns, Florian Bohnen, Jan-Eric Nekolla, Stephan G. Weber, Manuel M. Lauenroth, Anna Rattka, Manuel Hermann, Ken Dobrev, Dobromir Rassaf, Tienush Wakili, Reza Rischpler, Christoph Siebermair, Johannes J Nucl Cardiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation modality for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablating myocardium by electroporation without tissue-heating. With its different mechanism of tissue ablation, it is assumed that lesion creation is divergent to thermal energy sources. (68)Ga-fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT targets FAP-alpha expressed by activated fibroblasts. We aimed to assess (68)Ga-FAPI uptake in pulmonary veins as surrogate for ablation damage after PFA and cryoballoon ablation (CBA). METHODS: 26 patients (15 PFA, 11 CBA) underwent (68)Ga-FAPI-PET/CT after ablation. Standardized uptake values (SUV) and fibroblast-activation volumes of localized tracer uptake were assessed. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. In PFA, focal FAPI uptake was only observed in 3/15 (20%) patients, whereas in the CBA cohort, 10/11 (90.9%) patients showed atrial visual uptake. We observed lower values of SUV(max) (2.85 ± 0.56 vs 4.71 ± 2.06, P = 0.025) and FAV (1.13 ± 0.84 cm(3) vs 3.91 ± 2.74 cm(3), P = 0.014) along with a trend towards lower SUV(peak) and SUV(mean) in PFA vs CBA patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tissue response with respect to fibroblast activation seems to be less pronounced in PFA compared to established thermal ablation systems. This functional assessment might contribute to a better understanding of lesion formation in thermal and PFA ablation potentially contributing to better safety outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-023-03220-8. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10558367/ /pubmed/36944827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03220-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kupusovic, Jana Kessler, Lukas Bruns, Florian Bohnen, Jan-Eric Nekolla, Stephan G. Weber, Manuel M. Lauenroth, Anna Rattka, Manuel Hermann, Ken Dobrev, Dobromir Rassaf, Tienush Wakili, Reza Rischpler, Christoph Siebermair, Johannes Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation |
title | Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation |
title_full | Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation |
title_fullStr | Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation |
title_short | Visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation |
title_sort | visualization of fibroblast activation using (68)ga-fapi pet/ct after pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field compared with cryoballoon ablation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36944827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03220-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kupusovicjana visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT kesslerlukas visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT brunsflorian visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT bohnenjaneric visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT nekollastephang visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT webermanuelm visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT lauenrothanna visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT rattkamanuel visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT hermannken visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT dobrevdobromir visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT rassaftienush visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT wakilireza visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT rischplerchristoph visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation AT siebermairjohannes visualizationoffibroblastactivationusing68gafapipetctafterpulmonaryveinisolationwithpulsedfieldcomparedwithcryoballoonablation |