Cargando…

A systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: FRAX, DeFRA, FRA-HS

PURPOSE: Preventing fragility fractures by treating osteoporosis may reduce disability and mortality worldwide. Algorithms combining clinical risk factors with bone mineral density have been developed to better estimate fracture risk and possible treatment thresholds. This systematic review supporte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adami, G., Biffi, A., Porcu, G., Ronco, R., Alvaro, R., Bogini, R., Caputi, A. P., Cianferotti, L., Frediani, B., Gatti, D., Gonnelli, S., Iolascon, G., Lenzi, A., Leone, S., Migliaccio, S., Nicoletti, T., Paoletta, M., Pennini, A., Piccirilli, E., Tarantino, U., Brandi, M. L., Corrao, G., Rossini, M., Michieli, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37031450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-023-02082-8
_version_ 1785117262157447168
author Adami, G.
Biffi, A.
Porcu, G.
Ronco, R.
Alvaro, R.
Bogini, R.
Caputi, A. P.
Cianferotti, L.
Frediani, B.
Gatti, D.
Gonnelli, S.
Iolascon, G.
Lenzi, A.
Leone, S.
Migliaccio, S.
Nicoletti, T.
Paoletta, M.
Pennini, A.
Piccirilli, E.
Tarantino, U.
Brandi, M. L.
Corrao, G.
Rossini, M.
Michieli, R.
author_facet Adami, G.
Biffi, A.
Porcu, G.
Ronco, R.
Alvaro, R.
Bogini, R.
Caputi, A. P.
Cianferotti, L.
Frediani, B.
Gatti, D.
Gonnelli, S.
Iolascon, G.
Lenzi, A.
Leone, S.
Migliaccio, S.
Nicoletti, T.
Paoletta, M.
Pennini, A.
Piccirilli, E.
Tarantino, U.
Brandi, M. L.
Corrao, G.
Rossini, M.
Michieli, R.
author_sort Adami, G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Preventing fragility fractures by treating osteoporosis may reduce disability and mortality worldwide. Algorithms combining clinical risk factors with bone mineral density have been developed to better estimate fracture risk and possible treatment thresholds. This systematic review supported panel members of the Italian Fragility Fracture Guidelines in recommending the use of best-performant tool. The clinical performance of the three most used fracture risk assessment tools (DeFRA, FRAX, and FRA-HS) was assessed in at-risk patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched till December 2020 for studies investigating risk assessment tools for predicting major osteoporotic or hip fractures in patients with osteoporosis or fragility fractures. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), and areas under the curve (AUCs) were evaluated for all tools at different thresholds. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2; certainty of evidence (CoE) was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Forty-three articles were considered (40, 1, and 2 for FRAX, FRA-HS, and DeFRA, respectively), with the CoE ranging from very low to high quality. A reduction of Sn and increase of Sp for major osteoporotic fractures were observed among women and the entire population with cut-off augmentation. No significant differences were found on comparing FRAX to DeFRA in women (AUC 59–88% vs. 74%) and diabetics (AUC 73% vs. 89%). FRAX demonstrated non-significantly better discriminatory power than FRA-HS among men. CONCLUSION: The task force formulated appropriate recommendations on the use of any fracture risk assessment tools in patients with or at risk of fragility fractures, since no statistically significant differences emerged across different prediction tools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40618-023-02082-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10558377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105583772023-10-08 A systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: FRAX, DeFRA, FRA-HS Adami, G. Biffi, A. Porcu, G. Ronco, R. Alvaro, R. Bogini, R. Caputi, A. P. Cianferotti, L. Frediani, B. Gatti, D. Gonnelli, S. Iolascon, G. Lenzi, A. Leone, S. Migliaccio, S. Nicoletti, T. Paoletta, M. Pennini, A. Piccirilli, E. Tarantino, U. Brandi, M. L. Corrao, G. Rossini, M. Michieli, R. J Endocrinol Invest Original Article PURPOSE: Preventing fragility fractures by treating osteoporosis may reduce disability and mortality worldwide. Algorithms combining clinical risk factors with bone mineral density have been developed to better estimate fracture risk and possible treatment thresholds. This systematic review supported panel members of the Italian Fragility Fracture Guidelines in recommending the use of best-performant tool. The clinical performance of the three most used fracture risk assessment tools (DeFRA, FRAX, and FRA-HS) was assessed in at-risk patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched till December 2020 for studies investigating risk assessment tools for predicting major osteoporotic or hip fractures in patients with osteoporosis or fragility fractures. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), and areas under the curve (AUCs) were evaluated for all tools at different thresholds. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2; certainty of evidence (CoE) was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Forty-three articles were considered (40, 1, and 2 for FRAX, FRA-HS, and DeFRA, respectively), with the CoE ranging from very low to high quality. A reduction of Sn and increase of Sp for major osteoporotic fractures were observed among women and the entire population with cut-off augmentation. No significant differences were found on comparing FRAX to DeFRA in women (AUC 59–88% vs. 74%) and diabetics (AUC 73% vs. 89%). FRAX demonstrated non-significantly better discriminatory power than FRA-HS among men. CONCLUSION: The task force formulated appropriate recommendations on the use of any fracture risk assessment tools in patients with or at risk of fragility fractures, since no statistically significant differences emerged across different prediction tools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40618-023-02082-8. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10558377/ /pubmed/37031450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-023-02082-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Adami, G.
Biffi, A.
Porcu, G.
Ronco, R.
Alvaro, R.
Bogini, R.
Caputi, A. P.
Cianferotti, L.
Frediani, B.
Gatti, D.
Gonnelli, S.
Iolascon, G.
Lenzi, A.
Leone, S.
Migliaccio, S.
Nicoletti, T.
Paoletta, M.
Pennini, A.
Piccirilli, E.
Tarantino, U.
Brandi, M. L.
Corrao, G.
Rossini, M.
Michieli, R.
A systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: FRAX, DeFRA, FRA-HS
title A systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: FRAX, DeFRA, FRA-HS
title_full A systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: FRAX, DeFRA, FRA-HS
title_fullStr A systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: FRAX, DeFRA, FRA-HS
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: FRAX, DeFRA, FRA-HS
title_short A systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: FRAX, DeFRA, FRA-HS
title_sort systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: frax, defra, fra-hs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37031450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-023-02082-8
work_keys_str_mv AT adamig asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT biffia asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT porcug asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT roncor asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT alvaror asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT boginir asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT caputiap asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT cianferottil asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT fredianib asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT gattid asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT gonnellis asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT iolascong asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT lenzia asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT leones asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT migliaccios asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT nicolettit asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT paolettam asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT penninia asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT piccirillie asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT tarantinou asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT brandiml asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT corraog asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT rossinim asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT michielir asystematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT adamig systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT biffia systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT porcug systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT roncor systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT alvaror systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT boginir systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT caputiap systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT cianferottil systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT fredianib systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT gattid systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT gonnellis systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT iolascong systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT lenzia systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT leones systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT migliaccios systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT nicolettit systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT paolettam systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT penninia systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT piccirillie systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT tarantinou systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT brandiml systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT corraog systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT rossinim systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs
AT michielir systematicreviewontheperformanceoffractureriskassessmenttoolsfraxdefrafrahs