Cargando…
Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs
This study investigated two artificial intelligence (AI) methods for automatically classifying dental implant diameter and length based on periapical radiographs. The first method, deep learning (DL), involved utilizing the pre-trained VGG16 model and adjusting the fine-tuning degree to analyze imag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42385-7 |
_version_ | 1785117307976024064 |
---|---|
author | Park, Ji-Hyun Moon, Hong Seok Jung, Hoi-In Hwang, JaeJoon Choi, Yoon-Ho Kim, Jong-Eun |
author_facet | Park, Ji-Hyun Moon, Hong Seok Jung, Hoi-In Hwang, JaeJoon Choi, Yoon-Ho Kim, Jong-Eun |
author_sort | Park, Ji-Hyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated two artificial intelligence (AI) methods for automatically classifying dental implant diameter and length based on periapical radiographs. The first method, deep learning (DL), involved utilizing the pre-trained VGG16 model and adjusting the fine-tuning degree to analyze image data obtained from periapical radiographs. The second method, clustering analysis, was accomplished by analyzing the implant-specific feature vector derived from three key points coordinates of the dental implant using the k-means++ algorithm and adjusting the weight of the feature vector. DL and clustering model classified dental implant size into nine groups. The performance metrics of AI models were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). The final DL model yielded performances above 0.994, 0.950, 0.994, 0.974, 0.952, 0.994, and 0.975, respectively, and the final clustering model yielded performances above 0.983, 0.900, 0.988, 0.923, 0.909, 0.988, and 0.947, respectively. When comparing the AI model before tuning and the final AI model, statistically significant performance improvements were observed in six out of nine groups for DL models and four out of nine groups for clustering models based on AUC-ROC. Two AI models showed reliable classification performances. For clinical applications, AI models require validation on various multicenter data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10558577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105585772023-10-08 Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs Park, Ji-Hyun Moon, Hong Seok Jung, Hoi-In Hwang, JaeJoon Choi, Yoon-Ho Kim, Jong-Eun Sci Rep Article This study investigated two artificial intelligence (AI) methods for automatically classifying dental implant diameter and length based on periapical radiographs. The first method, deep learning (DL), involved utilizing the pre-trained VGG16 model and adjusting the fine-tuning degree to analyze image data obtained from periapical radiographs. The second method, clustering analysis, was accomplished by analyzing the implant-specific feature vector derived from three key points coordinates of the dental implant using the k-means++ algorithm and adjusting the weight of the feature vector. DL and clustering model classified dental implant size into nine groups. The performance metrics of AI models were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). The final DL model yielded performances above 0.994, 0.950, 0.994, 0.974, 0.952, 0.994, and 0.975, respectively, and the final clustering model yielded performances above 0.983, 0.900, 0.988, 0.923, 0.909, 0.988, and 0.947, respectively. When comparing the AI model before tuning and the final AI model, statistically significant performance improvements were observed in six out of nine groups for DL models and four out of nine groups for clustering models based on AUC-ROC. Two AI models showed reliable classification performances. For clinical applications, AI models require validation on various multicenter data. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10558577/ /pubmed/37803022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42385-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Park, Ji-Hyun Moon, Hong Seok Jung, Hoi-In Hwang, JaeJoon Choi, Yoon-Ho Kim, Jong-Eun Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs |
title | Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs |
title_full | Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs |
title_fullStr | Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs |
title_short | Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs |
title_sort | deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42385-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkjihyun deeplearningandclusteringapproachesfordentalimplantsizeclassificationbasedonperiapicalradiographs AT moonhongseok deeplearningandclusteringapproachesfordentalimplantsizeclassificationbasedonperiapicalradiographs AT junghoiin deeplearningandclusteringapproachesfordentalimplantsizeclassificationbasedonperiapicalradiographs AT hwangjaejoon deeplearningandclusteringapproachesfordentalimplantsizeclassificationbasedonperiapicalradiographs AT choiyoonho deeplearningandclusteringapproachesfordentalimplantsizeclassificationbasedonperiapicalradiographs AT kimjongeun deeplearningandclusteringapproachesfordentalimplantsizeclassificationbasedonperiapicalradiographs |