Cargando…

Comparison of two different orthokeratology lenses and defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lens in controlling myopia progression

BACKGROUND: To compare axial elongation in 8–11-year-old myopes wearing orthokeratology (OK) lenses with different back optic zone diameters (BOZD), defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lenses, and single-vision soft contact lenses (SCLs). METHODS: A total of 122 children (aged 8–11 years) with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Na, Lin, Weiping, Liang, Ruixue, Sun, Ziwen, Du, Bei, Wei, Ruihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37805535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-023-00358-x
_version_ 1785117502945099776
author Li, Na
Lin, Weiping
Liang, Ruixue
Sun, Ziwen
Du, Bei
Wei, Ruihua
author_facet Li, Na
Lin, Weiping
Liang, Ruixue
Sun, Ziwen
Du, Bei
Wei, Ruihua
author_sort Li, Na
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare axial elongation in 8–11-year-old myopes wearing orthokeratology (OK) lenses with different back optic zone diameters (BOZD), defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lenses, and single-vision soft contact lenses (SCLs). METHODS: A total of 122 children (aged 8–11 years) with spherical equivalent refraction (SER) between − 1.00 D and − 4.00 D were enrolled in this prospective study and randomly assigned to four groups: 5.0 mm-BOZD OK, 6.2 mm-BOZD OK, DISC, and single-vision SCLs. Children in each group were further divided into subgroups stratified by the average baseline SER: low myopic eyes (SER: − 1.00 D to − 2.50 D) and moderate myopic eyes (SER: − 2.50 D and over). Axial length (AL) was measured at baseline and after one year. RESULTS: The 5.0 mm-BOZD OK, 6.2 mm-BOZD OK, and DISC groups exhibited significantly slower AL elongation than the SCL group. The proportion of slow progressors (AL elongation ≤ 0.18 mm/year) in the first three groups was 42%, 23%, and 29%, respectively. Furthermore, one-year AL elongation was significantly smaller in the 5.0 mm-BOZD OK group compared with the 6.2 mm-BOZD OK group. Regardless of SER, children in the 5.0 mm-BOZD OK and DISC groups showed comparably slower AL elongation than those in the SCL group. However, fitting with 6.2 mm-BOZD OK lenses significantly retarded AL elongation in moderate myopic eyes, but not in low myopic eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 5.0 mm-BOZD OK lenses, 6.2 mm-BOZD OK lenses, and DISC lenses were effective in retarding AL elongation in 8–11-year-old myopes compared with single-vision SCLs, but for children with SER less than − 2.50 D, fitting with 5.0 mm-BOZD OK lenses and DISC lenses yielded better myopia control efficacy compared to wearing single-vision SCLs or 6.2 mm-BOZD OK lenses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10559459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105594592023-10-08 Comparison of two different orthokeratology lenses and defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lens in controlling myopia progression Li, Na Lin, Weiping Liang, Ruixue Sun, Ziwen Du, Bei Wei, Ruihua Eye Vis (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: To compare axial elongation in 8–11-year-old myopes wearing orthokeratology (OK) lenses with different back optic zone diameters (BOZD), defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lenses, and single-vision soft contact lenses (SCLs). METHODS: A total of 122 children (aged 8–11 years) with spherical equivalent refraction (SER) between − 1.00 D and − 4.00 D were enrolled in this prospective study and randomly assigned to four groups: 5.0 mm-BOZD OK, 6.2 mm-BOZD OK, DISC, and single-vision SCLs. Children in each group were further divided into subgroups stratified by the average baseline SER: low myopic eyes (SER: − 1.00 D to − 2.50 D) and moderate myopic eyes (SER: − 2.50 D and over). Axial length (AL) was measured at baseline and after one year. RESULTS: The 5.0 mm-BOZD OK, 6.2 mm-BOZD OK, and DISC groups exhibited significantly slower AL elongation than the SCL group. The proportion of slow progressors (AL elongation ≤ 0.18 mm/year) in the first three groups was 42%, 23%, and 29%, respectively. Furthermore, one-year AL elongation was significantly smaller in the 5.0 mm-BOZD OK group compared with the 6.2 mm-BOZD OK group. Regardless of SER, children in the 5.0 mm-BOZD OK and DISC groups showed comparably slower AL elongation than those in the SCL group. However, fitting with 6.2 mm-BOZD OK lenses significantly retarded AL elongation in moderate myopic eyes, but not in low myopic eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 5.0 mm-BOZD OK lenses, 6.2 mm-BOZD OK lenses, and DISC lenses were effective in retarding AL elongation in 8–11-year-old myopes compared with single-vision SCLs, but for children with SER less than − 2.50 D, fitting with 5.0 mm-BOZD OK lenses and DISC lenses yielded better myopia control efficacy compared to wearing single-vision SCLs or 6.2 mm-BOZD OK lenses. BioMed Central 2023-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10559459/ /pubmed/37805535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-023-00358-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Na
Lin, Weiping
Liang, Ruixue
Sun, Ziwen
Du, Bei
Wei, Ruihua
Comparison of two different orthokeratology lenses and defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lens in controlling myopia progression
title Comparison of two different orthokeratology lenses and defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lens in controlling myopia progression
title_full Comparison of two different orthokeratology lenses and defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lens in controlling myopia progression
title_fullStr Comparison of two different orthokeratology lenses and defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lens in controlling myopia progression
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two different orthokeratology lenses and defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lens in controlling myopia progression
title_short Comparison of two different orthokeratology lenses and defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lens in controlling myopia progression
title_sort comparison of two different orthokeratology lenses and defocus incorporated soft contact (disc) lens in controlling myopia progression
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37805535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-023-00358-x
work_keys_str_mv AT lina comparisonoftwodifferentorthokeratologylensesanddefocusincorporatedsoftcontactdisclensincontrollingmyopiaprogression
AT linweiping comparisonoftwodifferentorthokeratologylensesanddefocusincorporatedsoftcontactdisclensincontrollingmyopiaprogression
AT liangruixue comparisonoftwodifferentorthokeratologylensesanddefocusincorporatedsoftcontactdisclensincontrollingmyopiaprogression
AT sunziwen comparisonoftwodifferentorthokeratologylensesanddefocusincorporatedsoftcontactdisclensincontrollingmyopiaprogression
AT dubei comparisonoftwodifferentorthokeratologylensesanddefocusincorporatedsoftcontactdisclensincontrollingmyopiaprogression
AT weiruihua comparisonoftwodifferentorthokeratologylensesanddefocusincorporatedsoftcontactdisclensincontrollingmyopiaprogression