Cargando…
Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature
On-site sanitation systems (OSS) are a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Although efforts have been made recently to measure and quantify emissions from septic tanks using various field-based methods, the vast majority of published literature reporting GHG emissions from OSS units (e.g., pit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37809600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19947 |
_version_ | 1785117531773599744 |
---|---|
author | Poudel, Prativa Ghimire, Anish Howard, Guy Evans, Barbara Camargo-Valero, Miller A. Mills, Freya Reddy, Olivia Sharma, Subodh Tuladhar, Sarana Geremew, Abraham Okurut, Kenan Ngom, Baba Baidya, Manish Dangol, Sheila |
author_facet | Poudel, Prativa Ghimire, Anish Howard, Guy Evans, Barbara Camargo-Valero, Miller A. Mills, Freya Reddy, Olivia Sharma, Subodh Tuladhar, Sarana Geremew, Abraham Okurut, Kenan Ngom, Baba Baidya, Manish Dangol, Sheila |
author_sort | Poudel, Prativa |
collection | PubMed |
description | On-site sanitation systems (OSS) are a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Although efforts have been made recently to measure and quantify emissions from septic tanks using various field-based methods, the vast majority of published literature reporting GHG emissions from OSS units (e.g., pits and tanks) is based on non-empirical evidence. This systematic review presents an overview and limitations of field-based methods used for the quantification of GHG emissions from OSS. Papers published in English were searched in three databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, and Directory of Articles and Journals. Peer-reviewed papers that reported field-based methods applied to containment units in OSS were included in this study. Only eight out of 2085 papers met the inclusion criteria with septic tanks as the sole technology reported and were thus, considered for the review. Most of the studies have been conducted in middle- and high-income countries. Field-based measurements of GHGs are conducted using a flux chamber (FC) and the most commonly used FC methods are (a) the modified simple static FC, (b) automated static FC, and (c) floating FC. Data reported in published studies do not provide sufficient information on the calibration and validation of the results from the FCs used. The complex FC designs, laborious fieldwork operations, and reliance on expensive, specialist equipment, suggest that such methods may not be suitable in Low and Middle-Income countries (LMICs), where resources and access to laboratory facilities are limited. Also, the complexity of pits and tank typology in LMICs (i.e., unstandardised designs and sizes) may be a challenge to the use of FCs with fixed dimensions and set operational conditions. The variation in the quantification methods and resulting emission rates among the studies indicates that gaps prevail in the use of existing methods. Therefore, there is still a need for a simple field-based, easily adaptable FC method with adequate calibration and validation that can help in reliably quantifying the emissions from different OSS in any LMICs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10559576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105595762023-10-08 Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature Poudel, Prativa Ghimire, Anish Howard, Guy Evans, Barbara Camargo-Valero, Miller A. Mills, Freya Reddy, Olivia Sharma, Subodh Tuladhar, Sarana Geremew, Abraham Okurut, Kenan Ngom, Baba Baidya, Manish Dangol, Sheila Heliyon Review Article On-site sanitation systems (OSS) are a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Although efforts have been made recently to measure and quantify emissions from septic tanks using various field-based methods, the vast majority of published literature reporting GHG emissions from OSS units (e.g., pits and tanks) is based on non-empirical evidence. This systematic review presents an overview and limitations of field-based methods used for the quantification of GHG emissions from OSS. Papers published in English were searched in three databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, and Directory of Articles and Journals. Peer-reviewed papers that reported field-based methods applied to containment units in OSS were included in this study. Only eight out of 2085 papers met the inclusion criteria with septic tanks as the sole technology reported and were thus, considered for the review. Most of the studies have been conducted in middle- and high-income countries. Field-based measurements of GHGs are conducted using a flux chamber (FC) and the most commonly used FC methods are (a) the modified simple static FC, (b) automated static FC, and (c) floating FC. Data reported in published studies do not provide sufficient information on the calibration and validation of the results from the FCs used. The complex FC designs, laborious fieldwork operations, and reliance on expensive, specialist equipment, suggest that such methods may not be suitable in Low and Middle-Income countries (LMICs), where resources and access to laboratory facilities are limited. Also, the complexity of pits and tank typology in LMICs (i.e., unstandardised designs and sizes) may be a challenge to the use of FCs with fixed dimensions and set operational conditions. The variation in the quantification methods and resulting emission rates among the studies indicates that gaps prevail in the use of existing methods. Therefore, there is still a need for a simple field-based, easily adaptable FC method with adequate calibration and validation that can help in reliably quantifying the emissions from different OSS in any LMICs. Elsevier 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10559576/ /pubmed/37809600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19947 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Poudel, Prativa Ghimire, Anish Howard, Guy Evans, Barbara Camargo-Valero, Miller A. Mills, Freya Reddy, Olivia Sharma, Subodh Tuladhar, Sarana Geremew, Abraham Okurut, Kenan Ngom, Baba Baidya, Manish Dangol, Sheila Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature |
title | Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature |
title_full | Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature |
title_fullStr | Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature |
title_short | Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature |
title_sort | field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: a systematic review of published literature |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37809600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19947 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poudelprativa fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT ghimireanish fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT howardguy fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT evansbarbara fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT camargovaleromillera fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT millsfreya fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT reddyolivia fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT sharmasubodh fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT tuladharsarana fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT geremewabraham fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT okurutkenan fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT ngombaba fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT baidyamanish fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature AT dangolsheila fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature |