Cargando…

Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature

On-site sanitation systems (OSS) are a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Although efforts have been made recently to measure and quantify emissions from septic tanks using various field-based methods, the vast majority of published literature reporting GHG emissions from OSS units (e.g., pit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poudel, Prativa, Ghimire, Anish, Howard, Guy, Evans, Barbara, Camargo-Valero, Miller A., Mills, Freya, Reddy, Olivia, Sharma, Subodh, Tuladhar, Sarana, Geremew, Abraham, Okurut, Kenan, Ngom, Baba, Baidya, Manish, Dangol, Sheila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37809600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19947
_version_ 1785117531773599744
author Poudel, Prativa
Ghimire, Anish
Howard, Guy
Evans, Barbara
Camargo-Valero, Miller A.
Mills, Freya
Reddy, Olivia
Sharma, Subodh
Tuladhar, Sarana
Geremew, Abraham
Okurut, Kenan
Ngom, Baba
Baidya, Manish
Dangol, Sheila
author_facet Poudel, Prativa
Ghimire, Anish
Howard, Guy
Evans, Barbara
Camargo-Valero, Miller A.
Mills, Freya
Reddy, Olivia
Sharma, Subodh
Tuladhar, Sarana
Geremew, Abraham
Okurut, Kenan
Ngom, Baba
Baidya, Manish
Dangol, Sheila
author_sort Poudel, Prativa
collection PubMed
description On-site sanitation systems (OSS) are a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Although efforts have been made recently to measure and quantify emissions from septic tanks using various field-based methods, the vast majority of published literature reporting GHG emissions from OSS units (e.g., pits and tanks) is based on non-empirical evidence. This systematic review presents an overview and limitations of field-based methods used for the quantification of GHG emissions from OSS. Papers published in English were searched in three databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, and Directory of Articles and Journals. Peer-reviewed papers that reported field-based methods applied to containment units in OSS were included in this study. Only eight out of 2085 papers met the inclusion criteria with septic tanks as the sole technology reported and were thus, considered for the review. Most of the studies have been conducted in middle- and high-income countries. Field-based measurements of GHGs are conducted using a flux chamber (FC) and the most commonly used FC methods are (a) the modified simple static FC, (b) automated static FC, and (c) floating FC. Data reported in published studies do not provide sufficient information on the calibration and validation of the results from the FCs used. The complex FC designs, laborious fieldwork operations, and reliance on expensive, specialist equipment, suggest that such methods may not be suitable in Low and Middle-Income countries (LMICs), where resources and access to laboratory facilities are limited. Also, the complexity of pits and tank typology in LMICs (i.e., unstandardised designs and sizes) may be a challenge to the use of FCs with fixed dimensions and set operational conditions. The variation in the quantification methods and resulting emission rates among the studies indicates that gaps prevail in the use of existing methods. Therefore, there is still a need for a simple field-based, easily adaptable FC method with adequate calibration and validation that can help in reliably quantifying the emissions from different OSS in any LMICs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10559576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105595762023-10-08 Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature Poudel, Prativa Ghimire, Anish Howard, Guy Evans, Barbara Camargo-Valero, Miller A. Mills, Freya Reddy, Olivia Sharma, Subodh Tuladhar, Sarana Geremew, Abraham Okurut, Kenan Ngom, Baba Baidya, Manish Dangol, Sheila Heliyon Review Article On-site sanitation systems (OSS) are a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Although efforts have been made recently to measure and quantify emissions from septic tanks using various field-based methods, the vast majority of published literature reporting GHG emissions from OSS units (e.g., pits and tanks) is based on non-empirical evidence. This systematic review presents an overview and limitations of field-based methods used for the quantification of GHG emissions from OSS. Papers published in English were searched in three databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, and Directory of Articles and Journals. Peer-reviewed papers that reported field-based methods applied to containment units in OSS were included in this study. Only eight out of 2085 papers met the inclusion criteria with septic tanks as the sole technology reported and were thus, considered for the review. Most of the studies have been conducted in middle- and high-income countries. Field-based measurements of GHGs are conducted using a flux chamber (FC) and the most commonly used FC methods are (a) the modified simple static FC, (b) automated static FC, and (c) floating FC. Data reported in published studies do not provide sufficient information on the calibration and validation of the results from the FCs used. The complex FC designs, laborious fieldwork operations, and reliance on expensive, specialist equipment, suggest that such methods may not be suitable in Low and Middle-Income countries (LMICs), where resources and access to laboratory facilities are limited. Also, the complexity of pits and tank typology in LMICs (i.e., unstandardised designs and sizes) may be a challenge to the use of FCs with fixed dimensions and set operational conditions. The variation in the quantification methods and resulting emission rates among the studies indicates that gaps prevail in the use of existing methods. Therefore, there is still a need for a simple field-based, easily adaptable FC method with adequate calibration and validation that can help in reliably quantifying the emissions from different OSS in any LMICs. Elsevier 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10559576/ /pubmed/37809600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19947 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Poudel, Prativa
Ghimire, Anish
Howard, Guy
Evans, Barbara
Camargo-Valero, Miller A.
Mills, Freya
Reddy, Olivia
Sharma, Subodh
Tuladhar, Sarana
Geremew, Abraham
Okurut, Kenan
Ngom, Baba
Baidya, Manish
Dangol, Sheila
Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature
title Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature
title_full Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature
title_fullStr Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature
title_full_unstemmed Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature
title_short Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature
title_sort field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: a systematic review of published literature
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37809600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19947
work_keys_str_mv AT poudelprativa fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT ghimireanish fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT howardguy fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT evansbarbara fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT camargovaleromillera fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT millsfreya fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT reddyolivia fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT sharmasubodh fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT tuladharsarana fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT geremewabraham fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT okurutkenan fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT ngombaba fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT baidyamanish fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature
AT dangolsheila fieldbasedmethodsformeasuringgreenhousegasesemissionsfromonsitesanitationsystemsasystematicreviewofpublishedliterature