Cargando…
What is the stable internal fixation for the unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures: a finite element analysis
BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures (OSFF) have historically been managed by the lateral anatomical locking plate with reasonable success. However, for some kinds of unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures (UOSFF), especially with bone defects, unilateral locki...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37805559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04256-9 |
_version_ | 1785117539929423872 |
---|---|
author | Rao, Jianwei Zhang, Junchao Ye, Zhou Zhang, Liguang Xu, Jiangbao |
author_facet | Rao, Jianwei Zhang, Junchao Ye, Zhou Zhang, Liguang Xu, Jiangbao |
author_sort | Rao, Jianwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures (OSFF) have historically been managed by the lateral anatomical locking plate with reasonable success. However, for some kinds of unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures (UOSFF), especially with bone defects, unilateral locking plate (ULLP) fixation failed or resulted in implant breakage. This paper is going to explore what is the stable internal fixation for UOSFF by adding the bilateral locking plate (BLLP) fixation. METHODS: OSFF models were divided into two groups according to the fracture line type, which would be further subdivided according to their angle of fracture line, presence of bone defect, location, and degree of bone defect. Thereafter, kinds of locking plate fixation were constructed. A 2010-N load was applied to the femoral head, and a 1086-N load was applied to the greater trochanter. In this condition, the maximum von Mises stress distribution of models were investigated. RESULTS: Firstly, it was obviously found that the stress concentration in the BLLP group was more dispersed than that in the ULLP group. Secondly, according to the fracture line analysis, the stress value of fracture line type in “\” model group was higher than that of “/” model group. Moreover, with the increase in fracture line angle, the stress value of the model increased. Thirdly, from the bone defect analysis, the stress value of the medial bone defect (MBD) model group was higher than that of the lateral bone defect (LBD) model group. And as the degree of bone defect increased, the stress value increased gradually in the model group. CONCLUSION: In the following four cases, lateral unilateral locking plate fixation cannot effectively stabilize the fracture end, and double locking plate internal fixation is a necessary choice. First, when the angle of the fracture line is large (30, 45). Second, when the fracture line type is “/.” Third, when the bone defect is large. Fourth, when the bone defect is medial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10559610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105596102023-10-08 What is the stable internal fixation for the unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures: a finite element analysis Rao, Jianwei Zhang, Junchao Ye, Zhou Zhang, Liguang Xu, Jiangbao J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures (OSFF) have historically been managed by the lateral anatomical locking plate with reasonable success. However, for some kinds of unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures (UOSFF), especially with bone defects, unilateral locking plate (ULLP) fixation failed or resulted in implant breakage. This paper is going to explore what is the stable internal fixation for UOSFF by adding the bilateral locking plate (BLLP) fixation. METHODS: OSFF models were divided into two groups according to the fracture line type, which would be further subdivided according to their angle of fracture line, presence of bone defect, location, and degree of bone defect. Thereafter, kinds of locking plate fixation were constructed. A 2010-N load was applied to the femoral head, and a 1086-N load was applied to the greater trochanter. In this condition, the maximum von Mises stress distribution of models were investigated. RESULTS: Firstly, it was obviously found that the stress concentration in the BLLP group was more dispersed than that in the ULLP group. Secondly, according to the fracture line analysis, the stress value of fracture line type in “\” model group was higher than that of “/” model group. Moreover, with the increase in fracture line angle, the stress value of the model increased. Thirdly, from the bone defect analysis, the stress value of the medial bone defect (MBD) model group was higher than that of the lateral bone defect (LBD) model group. And as the degree of bone defect increased, the stress value increased gradually in the model group. CONCLUSION: In the following four cases, lateral unilateral locking plate fixation cannot effectively stabilize the fracture end, and double locking plate internal fixation is a necessary choice. First, when the angle of the fracture line is large (30, 45). Second, when the fracture line type is “/.” Third, when the bone defect is large. Fourth, when the bone defect is medial. BioMed Central 2023-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10559610/ /pubmed/37805559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04256-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rao, Jianwei Zhang, Junchao Ye, Zhou Zhang, Liguang Xu, Jiangbao What is the stable internal fixation for the unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures: a finite element analysis |
title | What is the stable internal fixation for the unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures: a finite element analysis |
title_full | What is the stable internal fixation for the unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures: a finite element analysis |
title_fullStr | What is the stable internal fixation for the unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures: a finite element analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the stable internal fixation for the unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures: a finite element analysis |
title_short | What is the stable internal fixation for the unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures: a finite element analysis |
title_sort | what is the stable internal fixation for the unstable and osteoporotic supracondylar femoral fractures: a finite element analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37805559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04256-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raojianwei whatisthestableinternalfixationfortheunstableandosteoporoticsupracondylarfemoralfracturesafiniteelementanalysis AT zhangjunchao whatisthestableinternalfixationfortheunstableandosteoporoticsupracondylarfemoralfracturesafiniteelementanalysis AT yezhou whatisthestableinternalfixationfortheunstableandosteoporoticsupracondylarfemoralfracturesafiniteelementanalysis AT zhangliguang whatisthestableinternalfixationfortheunstableandosteoporoticsupracondylarfemoralfracturesafiniteelementanalysis AT xujiangbao whatisthestableinternalfixationfortheunstableandosteoporoticsupracondylarfemoralfracturesafiniteelementanalysis |