Cargando…

Undergraduate research implementation in physiotherapy: a hands-on and real experience of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the gold standard approach in physiotherapy, and it is essential that students are aware that it is the appropriate way to provide the patient with the best possible treatment. Undergraduate research (UR) can positively influence learning outcomes and res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sancho, Igor, Araolaza-Arrieta, Maialen, Villanueva-Ruiz, Iker, Arbillaga-Etxarri, Ane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04716-0
_version_ 1785117540878385152
author Sancho, Igor
Araolaza-Arrieta, Maialen
Villanueva-Ruiz, Iker
Arbillaga-Etxarri, Ane
author_facet Sancho, Igor
Araolaza-Arrieta, Maialen
Villanueva-Ruiz, Iker
Arbillaga-Etxarri, Ane
author_sort Sancho, Igor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the gold standard approach in physiotherapy, and it is essential that students are aware that it is the appropriate way to provide the patient with the best possible treatment. Undergraduate research (UR) can positively influence learning outcomes and research competencies related to EBP compared to traditional methods of higher education. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementing a research-based activity (i.e., active participation in a randomised controlled trial [RCT]) in the UR programme on the learning and acquisition of research methodology-related competencies by first-year physiotherapy students. METHODS: Students in the first academic year of the Bachelor´s Degree in Physiotherapy of University of Deusto (Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain) who were enrolled in the subject ‘Introduction to Research Methodology’ were invited to take part in a real RCT which consisted of three groups: intervention, placebo, and control group. While the RCT was carried out, researchers and/or participants roles were combined among students during the semester. At the end, a questionnaire that included open and closed questions was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the UR strategies used in students´ acquisition of theoretical knowledge, research competencies, self-efficacy of RCT skills and procedures. Lecturers also completed the questionnaire to evaluate their experience. RESULTS: From the 114 students enrolled in the subject, 102 participated in the RCT and 110 answered the final questionnaire. Regarding the development of research competencies, UR had a positive or very positive impact on critical thinking (67% and 18%, respectively) and in the assessment of methodological quality (66% and 23%, respectively). Furthermore, most students reported that the implementation of the RCT facilitated their knowledge of placebo, detection of bias, development of critical thinking and a better understanding of methodological issues in research. Lecturers reported an additional burden that was difficult to reconcile with daily duties. CONCLUSION: The novel UR program provided students with a new opportunity to improve their knowledge of RCT procedures, thus making the learning process more meaningful. Therefore, ways of teaching and learning focused on improving research and inquiry attitudes should be considered and integrated into the health care curriculum, especially in physiotherapy programs, to ensure the transfer of EBP for the provision of the best care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Registry: ACTRN12622000263796p (14/02/2022). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04716-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10559614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105596142023-10-08 Undergraduate research implementation in physiotherapy: a hands-on and real experience of a randomised controlled trial Sancho, Igor Araolaza-Arrieta, Maialen Villanueva-Ruiz, Iker Arbillaga-Etxarri, Ane BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the gold standard approach in physiotherapy, and it is essential that students are aware that it is the appropriate way to provide the patient with the best possible treatment. Undergraduate research (UR) can positively influence learning outcomes and research competencies related to EBP compared to traditional methods of higher education. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementing a research-based activity (i.e., active participation in a randomised controlled trial [RCT]) in the UR programme on the learning and acquisition of research methodology-related competencies by first-year physiotherapy students. METHODS: Students in the first academic year of the Bachelor´s Degree in Physiotherapy of University of Deusto (Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain) who were enrolled in the subject ‘Introduction to Research Methodology’ were invited to take part in a real RCT which consisted of three groups: intervention, placebo, and control group. While the RCT was carried out, researchers and/or participants roles were combined among students during the semester. At the end, a questionnaire that included open and closed questions was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the UR strategies used in students´ acquisition of theoretical knowledge, research competencies, self-efficacy of RCT skills and procedures. Lecturers also completed the questionnaire to evaluate their experience. RESULTS: From the 114 students enrolled in the subject, 102 participated in the RCT and 110 answered the final questionnaire. Regarding the development of research competencies, UR had a positive or very positive impact on critical thinking (67% and 18%, respectively) and in the assessment of methodological quality (66% and 23%, respectively). Furthermore, most students reported that the implementation of the RCT facilitated their knowledge of placebo, detection of bias, development of critical thinking and a better understanding of methodological issues in research. Lecturers reported an additional burden that was difficult to reconcile with daily duties. CONCLUSION: The novel UR program provided students with a new opportunity to improve their knowledge of RCT procedures, thus making the learning process more meaningful. Therefore, ways of teaching and learning focused on improving research and inquiry attitudes should be considered and integrated into the health care curriculum, especially in physiotherapy programs, to ensure the transfer of EBP for the provision of the best care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Registry: ACTRN12622000263796p (14/02/2022). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04716-0. BioMed Central 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10559614/ /pubmed/37803379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04716-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sancho, Igor
Araolaza-Arrieta, Maialen
Villanueva-Ruiz, Iker
Arbillaga-Etxarri, Ane
Undergraduate research implementation in physiotherapy: a hands-on and real experience of a randomised controlled trial
title Undergraduate research implementation in physiotherapy: a hands-on and real experience of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Undergraduate research implementation in physiotherapy: a hands-on and real experience of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Undergraduate research implementation in physiotherapy: a hands-on and real experience of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Undergraduate research implementation in physiotherapy: a hands-on and real experience of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Undergraduate research implementation in physiotherapy: a hands-on and real experience of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort undergraduate research implementation in physiotherapy: a hands-on and real experience of a randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37803379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04716-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchoigor undergraduateresearchimplementationinphysiotherapyahandsonandrealexperienceofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT araolazaarrietamaialen undergraduateresearchimplementationinphysiotherapyahandsonandrealexperienceofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT villanuevaruiziker undergraduateresearchimplementationinphysiotherapyahandsonandrealexperienceofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT arbillagaetxarriane undergraduateresearchimplementationinphysiotherapyahandsonandrealexperienceofarandomisedcontrolledtrial