Cargando…

Asymptomatic dengue infection rate: A systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES: Dengue infection is spreading worldwide. The clinical spectrum is broad and includes asymptomatic infections. This review provides an overview of the different proportions of asymptomatic infections described in epidemiological studies according to definitions, study designs, and detecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Santis, Olga, Bouscaren, Nicolas, Flahault, Antoine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37809992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20069
_version_ 1785117590079668224
author De Santis, Olga
Bouscaren, Nicolas
Flahault, Antoine
author_facet De Santis, Olga
Bouscaren, Nicolas
Flahault, Antoine
author_sort De Santis, Olga
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Dengue infection is spreading worldwide. The clinical spectrum is broad and includes asymptomatic infections. This review provides an overview of the different proportions of asymptomatic infections described in epidemiological studies according to definitions, study designs, and detection methods. METHODS: Medline and Embase databases were searched without restriction of date or language. Studies were included if they reported data on the incidence or prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections. The data were summarized and classified according to the definitions of the term 'asymptomatic'. RESULTS: A total of 74 studies were included. The mean proportion of asymptomatic infections among dengue-infected persons was 54% in 50 included studies. The prevalence of dengue infections detected in healthy persons was 0.2% in 24 included studies. The term ‘asymptomatic’ has been used to refer to ‘clinically undetectable infection’, but also to ‘undiagnosed infection’ or ‘mild infection’. Only 8% were clinically undetectable laboratory-confirmed dengue infections. CONCLUSION: The proportion of asymptomatic dengue infections varied greatly. Studies proving data on clinically undetectable laboratory-confirmed dengue infections were very few, but provided consistent results of low proportions of asymptomatic infections. These data challenge the assumption that the majority of dengue cases are asymptomatic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10559824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105598242023-10-08 Asymptomatic dengue infection rate: A systematic literature review De Santis, Olga Bouscaren, Nicolas Flahault, Antoine Heliyon Review Article OBJECTIVES: Dengue infection is spreading worldwide. The clinical spectrum is broad and includes asymptomatic infections. This review provides an overview of the different proportions of asymptomatic infections described in epidemiological studies according to definitions, study designs, and detection methods. METHODS: Medline and Embase databases were searched without restriction of date or language. Studies were included if they reported data on the incidence or prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections. The data were summarized and classified according to the definitions of the term 'asymptomatic'. RESULTS: A total of 74 studies were included. The mean proportion of asymptomatic infections among dengue-infected persons was 54% in 50 included studies. The prevalence of dengue infections detected in healthy persons was 0.2% in 24 included studies. The term ‘asymptomatic’ has been used to refer to ‘clinically undetectable infection’, but also to ‘undiagnosed infection’ or ‘mild infection’. Only 8% were clinically undetectable laboratory-confirmed dengue infections. CONCLUSION: The proportion of asymptomatic dengue infections varied greatly. Studies proving data on clinically undetectable laboratory-confirmed dengue infections were very few, but provided consistent results of low proportions of asymptomatic infections. These data challenge the assumption that the majority of dengue cases are asymptomatic. Elsevier 2023-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10559824/ /pubmed/37809992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20069 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
De Santis, Olga
Bouscaren, Nicolas
Flahault, Antoine
Asymptomatic dengue infection rate: A systematic literature review
title Asymptomatic dengue infection rate: A systematic literature review
title_full Asymptomatic dengue infection rate: A systematic literature review
title_fullStr Asymptomatic dengue infection rate: A systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Asymptomatic dengue infection rate: A systematic literature review
title_short Asymptomatic dengue infection rate: A systematic literature review
title_sort asymptomatic dengue infection rate: a systematic literature review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37809992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20069
work_keys_str_mv AT desantisolga asymptomaticdengueinfectionrateasystematicliteraturereview
AT bouscarennicolas asymptomaticdengueinfectionrateasystematicliteraturereview
AT flahaultantoine asymptomaticdengueinfectionrateasystematicliteraturereview