Cargando…
Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion
PURPOSE: To assess whether organizational interventions are effective to prevent or reduce exhaustion, the core dimension of occupational burnout. METHODS: We searched in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases randomized and non-randomized controlled trials conducted among active w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37758838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-023-02009-z |
_version_ | 1785117671881179136 |
---|---|
author | Bes, Isabelle Shoman, Yara Al-Gobari, Muaamar Rousson, Valentin Guseva Canu, Irina |
author_facet | Bes, Isabelle Shoman, Yara Al-Gobari, Muaamar Rousson, Valentin Guseva Canu, Irina |
author_sort | Bes, Isabelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess whether organizational interventions are effective to prevent or reduce exhaustion, the core dimension of occupational burnout. METHODS: We searched in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases randomized and non-randomized controlled trials conducted among active workers and reporting the outcome as exhaustion score. We calculated the effect sizes using the pre-test–post-test control group design’s estimate. We used the random effects model in meta-analysis and Cochrane collaboration’s tool for interventions to assess the risk of bias. Overall quality of evidence was appraised using the GRADE. RESULTS: From the 2425 identified records, we assessed 228 full texts for eligibility and included 11 original articles describing 13 studies, 11 on organizational interventions, and 2 on combined inventions. The interventions were participatory (n = 9), focused on workload (n = 2), or on work schedule (n = 2). The overall effect size was − 0.30 ((95% CI = − 0.42; − 0.18), I(2) = 62.28%), corresponding to a small reduction in exhaustion with a very low quality of evidence. Combined interventions had a larger effect (− 0.54 (95% CI = − 0.76; − 0.32)) than organizational interventions. When split by type of intervention, both participatory interventions and interventions focused on workload had a benefic effect of exhaustion reduction, with an estimated effect size of − 0.34 (95% CI = − 0.47; − 0.20) and − 0.44 (95% CI = − 0.68, − 0.20), respectively. CONCLUSION: Interventions at combined level in workplaces could be helpful in preventing exhaustion. However, the evidence is still limited, due to a high heterogeneity between studies, bias potential, and small number of eligible studies. This calls for further research, using workload interventions at organizational level, especially in sectors with high risk of job stress and exhaustion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-023-02009-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10560169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105601692023-10-09 Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion Bes, Isabelle Shoman, Yara Al-Gobari, Muaamar Rousson, Valentin Guseva Canu, Irina Int Arch Occup Environ Health Review PURPOSE: To assess whether organizational interventions are effective to prevent or reduce exhaustion, the core dimension of occupational burnout. METHODS: We searched in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases randomized and non-randomized controlled trials conducted among active workers and reporting the outcome as exhaustion score. We calculated the effect sizes using the pre-test–post-test control group design’s estimate. We used the random effects model in meta-analysis and Cochrane collaboration’s tool for interventions to assess the risk of bias. Overall quality of evidence was appraised using the GRADE. RESULTS: From the 2425 identified records, we assessed 228 full texts for eligibility and included 11 original articles describing 13 studies, 11 on organizational interventions, and 2 on combined inventions. The interventions were participatory (n = 9), focused on workload (n = 2), or on work schedule (n = 2). The overall effect size was − 0.30 ((95% CI = − 0.42; − 0.18), I(2) = 62.28%), corresponding to a small reduction in exhaustion with a very low quality of evidence. Combined interventions had a larger effect (− 0.54 (95% CI = − 0.76; − 0.32)) than organizational interventions. When split by type of intervention, both participatory interventions and interventions focused on workload had a benefic effect of exhaustion reduction, with an estimated effect size of − 0.34 (95% CI = − 0.47; − 0.20) and − 0.44 (95% CI = − 0.68, − 0.20), respectively. CONCLUSION: Interventions at combined level in workplaces could be helpful in preventing exhaustion. However, the evidence is still limited, due to a high heterogeneity between studies, bias potential, and small number of eligible studies. This calls for further research, using workload interventions at organizational level, especially in sectors with high risk of job stress and exhaustion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-023-02009-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10560169/ /pubmed/37758838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-023-02009-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Bes, Isabelle Shoman, Yara Al-Gobari, Muaamar Rousson, Valentin Guseva Canu, Irina Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion |
title | Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion |
title_full | Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion |
title_fullStr | Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion |
title_full_unstemmed | Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion |
title_short | Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion |
title_sort | organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37758838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-023-02009-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT besisabelle organizationalinterventionsandoccupationalburnoutametaanalysiswithfocusonexhaustion AT shomanyara organizationalinterventionsandoccupationalburnoutametaanalysiswithfocusonexhaustion AT algobarimuaamar organizationalinterventionsandoccupationalburnoutametaanalysiswithfocusonexhaustion AT roussonvalentin organizationalinterventionsandoccupationalburnoutametaanalysiswithfocusonexhaustion AT gusevacanuirina organizationalinterventionsandoccupationalburnoutametaanalysiswithfocusonexhaustion |