Cargando…
Differences in configural processing for human versus android dynamic facial expressions
Humanlike androids can function as social agents in social situations and in experimental research. While some androids can imitate facial emotion expressions, it is unclear whether their expressions tap the same processing mechanisms utilized in human expression processing, for example configural p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37805572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44140-4 |
_version_ | 1785117683550781440 |
---|---|
author | Diel, Alexander Sato, Wataru Hsu, Chun-Ting Minato, Takashi |
author_facet | Diel, Alexander Sato, Wataru Hsu, Chun-Ting Minato, Takashi |
author_sort | Diel, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Humanlike androids can function as social agents in social situations and in experimental research. While some androids can imitate facial emotion expressions, it is unclear whether their expressions tap the same processing mechanisms utilized in human expression processing, for example configural processing. In this study, the effects of global inversion and asynchrony between facial features as configuration manipulations were compared in android and human dynamic emotion expressions. Seventy-five participants rated (1) angry and happy emotion recognition and (2) arousal and valence ratings of upright or inverted, synchronous or asynchronous, android or human agent dynamic emotion expressions. Asynchrony in dynamic expressions significantly decreased all ratings (except valence in angry expressions) in all human expressions, but did not affect android expressions. Inversion did not affect any measures regardless of agent type. These results suggest that dynamic facial expressions are processed in a synchrony-based configural manner for humans, but not for androids. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10560218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105602182023-10-09 Differences in configural processing for human versus android dynamic facial expressions Diel, Alexander Sato, Wataru Hsu, Chun-Ting Minato, Takashi Sci Rep Article Humanlike androids can function as social agents in social situations and in experimental research. While some androids can imitate facial emotion expressions, it is unclear whether their expressions tap the same processing mechanisms utilized in human expression processing, for example configural processing. In this study, the effects of global inversion and asynchrony between facial features as configuration manipulations were compared in android and human dynamic emotion expressions. Seventy-five participants rated (1) angry and happy emotion recognition and (2) arousal and valence ratings of upright or inverted, synchronous or asynchronous, android or human agent dynamic emotion expressions. Asynchrony in dynamic expressions significantly decreased all ratings (except valence in angry expressions) in all human expressions, but did not affect android expressions. Inversion did not affect any measures regardless of agent type. These results suggest that dynamic facial expressions are processed in a synchrony-based configural manner for humans, but not for androids. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10560218/ /pubmed/37805572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44140-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Diel, Alexander Sato, Wataru Hsu, Chun-Ting Minato, Takashi Differences in configural processing for human versus android dynamic facial expressions |
title | Differences in configural processing for human versus android dynamic facial expressions |
title_full | Differences in configural processing for human versus android dynamic facial expressions |
title_fullStr | Differences in configural processing for human versus android dynamic facial expressions |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in configural processing for human versus android dynamic facial expressions |
title_short | Differences in configural processing for human versus android dynamic facial expressions |
title_sort | differences in configural processing for human versus android dynamic facial expressions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37805572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44140-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dielalexander differencesinconfiguralprocessingforhumanversusandroiddynamicfacialexpressions AT satowataru differencesinconfiguralprocessingforhumanversusandroiddynamicfacialexpressions AT hsuchunting differencesinconfiguralprocessingforhumanversusandroiddynamicfacialexpressions AT minatotakashi differencesinconfiguralprocessingforhumanversusandroiddynamicfacialexpressions |