Cargando…
A mixed-methods process evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of involving community and peer role models within a physical activity intervention for primary-school-aged girls (the CHARMING study)
BACKGROUND: Role models have been identified as a potential means to tackle the persisting low levels of physical activity among young girls. The aim of this research was to explore the involvement of community- and peer role models within the CHARMING (CHoosing Active Role Models to INspire Girls)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37805485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16826-x |
_version_ | 1785117729612627968 |
---|---|
author | Morgan, Kelly Van Godwin, Jordan Cannings-John, Rebecca Hallingberg, Britt Moore, Graham Pell, Bethan Whiteley, Holly Hawkins, Jemma |
author_facet | Morgan, Kelly Van Godwin, Jordan Cannings-John, Rebecca Hallingberg, Britt Moore, Graham Pell, Bethan Whiteley, Holly Hawkins, Jemma |
author_sort | Morgan, Kelly |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Role models have been identified as a potential means to tackle the persisting low levels of physical activity among young girls. The aim of this research was to explore the involvement of community- and peer role models within the CHARMING (CHoosing Active Role Models to INspire Girls) intervention, an intervention which aims to increase and sustain physical activity among 9–10-year-old girls. The research questions were, is it feasible and acceptable to recruit role models? and what are the perceived barriers and facilitators to the inclusion of peer role models within the intervention? METHODS: A mixed methods process evaluation was embedded within a larger feasibility study, involving three secondary schools and four adjoining primary schools in South Wales, United Kingdom. One-to-one interviews were conducted with teachers (N = 10) across the seven schools and community role models (N = 10). Focus groups were conducted with 18 peer role models (older girls from adjoining secondary schools) and 18 girls aged 9–10-years who had participated in the intervention. Primary school teachers kept observation logs of each intervention session. A researcher completed observation logs of two random sessions per school. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis with a combined deductive and inductive coding approach. Observation data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Data were triangulated and comparative analyses conducted across schools. RESULTS: Twenty-three peer role models (aged 12–16-years) and 16 community role models participated in intervention delivery. Overall, the inclusion of both types of role models was shown as acceptable and feasible within the CHARMING intervention. Observation data highlighted key areas (i.e., intervention components delivered inconsistently) for further qualitative exploration. Six themes were identified during analyses; reach and access, communication, logistics, existing systems, interpersonal relationships, and perceived impacts. Themes were intertwined across the barriers and facilitators of recruitment and implementation. Areas for future improvement were highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: Findings can be used to optimise the CHARMING intervention and inform wider interventions or policies employing several role models across settings to promote physical activity among children. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16826-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10560422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105604222023-10-09 A mixed-methods process evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of involving community and peer role models within a physical activity intervention for primary-school-aged girls (the CHARMING study) Morgan, Kelly Van Godwin, Jordan Cannings-John, Rebecca Hallingberg, Britt Moore, Graham Pell, Bethan Whiteley, Holly Hawkins, Jemma BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Role models have been identified as a potential means to tackle the persisting low levels of physical activity among young girls. The aim of this research was to explore the involvement of community- and peer role models within the CHARMING (CHoosing Active Role Models to INspire Girls) intervention, an intervention which aims to increase and sustain physical activity among 9–10-year-old girls. The research questions were, is it feasible and acceptable to recruit role models? and what are the perceived barriers and facilitators to the inclusion of peer role models within the intervention? METHODS: A mixed methods process evaluation was embedded within a larger feasibility study, involving three secondary schools and four adjoining primary schools in South Wales, United Kingdom. One-to-one interviews were conducted with teachers (N = 10) across the seven schools and community role models (N = 10). Focus groups were conducted with 18 peer role models (older girls from adjoining secondary schools) and 18 girls aged 9–10-years who had participated in the intervention. Primary school teachers kept observation logs of each intervention session. A researcher completed observation logs of two random sessions per school. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis with a combined deductive and inductive coding approach. Observation data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Data were triangulated and comparative analyses conducted across schools. RESULTS: Twenty-three peer role models (aged 12–16-years) and 16 community role models participated in intervention delivery. Overall, the inclusion of both types of role models was shown as acceptable and feasible within the CHARMING intervention. Observation data highlighted key areas (i.e., intervention components delivered inconsistently) for further qualitative exploration. Six themes were identified during analyses; reach and access, communication, logistics, existing systems, interpersonal relationships, and perceived impacts. Themes were intertwined across the barriers and facilitators of recruitment and implementation. Areas for future improvement were highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: Findings can be used to optimise the CHARMING intervention and inform wider interventions or policies employing several role models across settings to promote physical activity among children. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16826-x. BioMed Central 2023-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10560422/ /pubmed/37805485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16826-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Morgan, Kelly Van Godwin, Jordan Cannings-John, Rebecca Hallingberg, Britt Moore, Graham Pell, Bethan Whiteley, Holly Hawkins, Jemma A mixed-methods process evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of involving community and peer role models within a physical activity intervention for primary-school-aged girls (the CHARMING study) |
title | A mixed-methods process evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of involving community and peer role models within a physical activity intervention for primary-school-aged girls (the CHARMING study) |
title_full | A mixed-methods process evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of involving community and peer role models within a physical activity intervention for primary-school-aged girls (the CHARMING study) |
title_fullStr | A mixed-methods process evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of involving community and peer role models within a physical activity intervention for primary-school-aged girls (the CHARMING study) |
title_full_unstemmed | A mixed-methods process evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of involving community and peer role models within a physical activity intervention for primary-school-aged girls (the CHARMING study) |
title_short | A mixed-methods process evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of involving community and peer role models within a physical activity intervention for primary-school-aged girls (the CHARMING study) |
title_sort | mixed-methods process evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of involving community and peer role models within a physical activity intervention for primary-school-aged girls (the charming study) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37805485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16826-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morgankelly amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT vangodwinjordan amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT canningsjohnrebecca amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT hallingbergbritt amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT mooregraham amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT pellbethan amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT whiteleyholly amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT hawkinsjemma amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT morgankelly mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT vangodwinjordan mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT canningsjohnrebecca mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT hallingbergbritt mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT mooregraham mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT pellbethan mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT whiteleyholly mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy AT hawkinsjemma mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofinvolvingcommunityandpeerrolemodelswithinaphysicalactivityinterventionforprimaryschoolagedgirlsthecharmingstudy |