Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Hardness and Energy Absorption of Some Commercially Available Chairside Silicone-Based Soft Denture Liners and a Heat-Cured Soft Denture Liner

AIM: To investigate the hardness and energy absorption of four commercially available chairside types of silicone materials and compare their properties with heat-cured silicone material. MATERIALS: The chairside materials investigated were GC reline soft, mucopren soft, sofreliner soft and elite so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mutahar, Mahdi, Al Ahmari, Nasser M, Gadah, Thrya S, Kariri, Mohammed Ali Mohammed, Madkhli, Hana Y, Somaili, Dawood M, Mobarki, Yahya M Y, Darraj, Omar Ahmed, Halawi, Sultan M, Al Moaleem, Mohammed M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814630
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S433519
_version_ 1785117740631064576
author Mutahar, Mahdi
Al Ahmari, Nasser M
Gadah, Thrya S
Kariri, Mohammed Ali Mohammed
Madkhli, Hana Y
Somaili, Dawood M
Mobarki, Yahya M Y
Darraj, Omar Ahmed
Halawi, Sultan M
Al Moaleem, Mohammed M
author_facet Mutahar, Mahdi
Al Ahmari, Nasser M
Gadah, Thrya S
Kariri, Mohammed Ali Mohammed
Madkhli, Hana Y
Somaili, Dawood M
Mobarki, Yahya M Y
Darraj, Omar Ahmed
Halawi, Sultan M
Al Moaleem, Mohammed M
author_sort Mutahar, Mahdi
collection PubMed
description AIM: To investigate the hardness and energy absorption of four commercially available chairside types of silicone materials and compare their properties with heat-cured silicone material. MATERIALS: The chairside materials investigated were GC reline soft, mucopren soft, sofreliner soft and elite soft relining. The heat-cured polymer silicone material was Molloplast B. All soft lining materials were processed according to manufacturers’ instructions. Two properties were investigated. Ten specimens for each test were prepared for each soft liner except for the water absorption and solubility test, for which only five specimens were prepared. The specimens of energy absorption (10 × 10 × 3 mm) were tested using a Lloyd instruments testing machine. Hardness specimens (38 × 38 × 3) were tested using a shore A durometer and were divided into two subgroups; dry and wet storage. RESULTS: The specimens of energy absorption (10 × 10 × 3 mm) were tested using a Lloyd instruments testing machine. Sofreliner soft was significantly softer than Molloplast B. GC reline soft was significantly harder than molloplast B. At high loads, sofreliner soft and elite soft relining was significantly more resilient than molloplast B. Mucopren soft was significantly stiffer than Molloplast B. At low loads, all materials showed similarities in stiffness and resilience; the difference between them was insignificant. After one month of immersion, GC reline and mucopren significantly increased hardness values. CONCLUSION: In all conditions and at all four-time points, the hardness values for GC Reline soft were the greatest, and hardness values for Sofreliner Soft were the least. Some chairside soft denture lining materials could have similar significant properties to molloplast-B, such as sofreliner soft and elite.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10560481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105604812023-10-09 Comparative Evaluation of Hardness and Energy Absorption of Some Commercially Available Chairside Silicone-Based Soft Denture Liners and a Heat-Cured Soft Denture Liner Mutahar, Mahdi Al Ahmari, Nasser M Gadah, Thrya S Kariri, Mohammed Ali Mohammed Madkhli, Hana Y Somaili, Dawood M Mobarki, Yahya M Y Darraj, Omar Ahmed Halawi, Sultan M Al Moaleem, Mohammed M Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Original Research AIM: To investigate the hardness and energy absorption of four commercially available chairside types of silicone materials and compare their properties with heat-cured silicone material. MATERIALS: The chairside materials investigated were GC reline soft, mucopren soft, sofreliner soft and elite soft relining. The heat-cured polymer silicone material was Molloplast B. All soft lining materials were processed according to manufacturers’ instructions. Two properties were investigated. Ten specimens for each test were prepared for each soft liner except for the water absorption and solubility test, for which only five specimens were prepared. The specimens of energy absorption (10 × 10 × 3 mm) were tested using a Lloyd instruments testing machine. Hardness specimens (38 × 38 × 3) were tested using a shore A durometer and were divided into two subgroups; dry and wet storage. RESULTS: The specimens of energy absorption (10 × 10 × 3 mm) were tested using a Lloyd instruments testing machine. Sofreliner soft was significantly softer than Molloplast B. GC reline soft was significantly harder than molloplast B. At high loads, sofreliner soft and elite soft relining was significantly more resilient than molloplast B. Mucopren soft was significantly stiffer than Molloplast B. At low loads, all materials showed similarities in stiffness and resilience; the difference between them was insignificant. After one month of immersion, GC reline and mucopren significantly increased hardness values. CONCLUSION: In all conditions and at all four-time points, the hardness values for GC Reline soft were the greatest, and hardness values for Sofreliner Soft were the least. Some chairside soft denture lining materials could have similar significant properties to molloplast-B, such as sofreliner soft and elite. Dove 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10560481/ /pubmed/37814630 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S433519 Text en © 2023 Mutahar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Mutahar, Mahdi
Al Ahmari, Nasser M
Gadah, Thrya S
Kariri, Mohammed Ali Mohammed
Madkhli, Hana Y
Somaili, Dawood M
Mobarki, Yahya M Y
Darraj, Omar Ahmed
Halawi, Sultan M
Al Moaleem, Mohammed M
Comparative Evaluation of Hardness and Energy Absorption of Some Commercially Available Chairside Silicone-Based Soft Denture Liners and a Heat-Cured Soft Denture Liner
title Comparative Evaluation of Hardness and Energy Absorption of Some Commercially Available Chairside Silicone-Based Soft Denture Liners and a Heat-Cured Soft Denture Liner
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Hardness and Energy Absorption of Some Commercially Available Chairside Silicone-Based Soft Denture Liners and a Heat-Cured Soft Denture Liner
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Hardness and Energy Absorption of Some Commercially Available Chairside Silicone-Based Soft Denture Liners and a Heat-Cured Soft Denture Liner
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Hardness and Energy Absorption of Some Commercially Available Chairside Silicone-Based Soft Denture Liners and a Heat-Cured Soft Denture Liner
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Hardness and Energy Absorption of Some Commercially Available Chairside Silicone-Based Soft Denture Liners and a Heat-Cured Soft Denture Liner
title_sort comparative evaluation of hardness and energy absorption of some commercially available chairside silicone-based soft denture liners and a heat-cured soft denture liner
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814630
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S433519
work_keys_str_mv AT mutaharmahdi comparativeevaluationofhardnessandenergyabsorptionofsomecommerciallyavailablechairsidesiliconebasedsoftdenturelinersandaheatcuredsoftdentureliner
AT alahmarinasserm comparativeevaluationofhardnessandenergyabsorptionofsomecommerciallyavailablechairsidesiliconebasedsoftdenturelinersandaheatcuredsoftdentureliner
AT gadahthryas comparativeevaluationofhardnessandenergyabsorptionofsomecommerciallyavailablechairsidesiliconebasedsoftdenturelinersandaheatcuredsoftdentureliner
AT karirimohammedalimohammed comparativeevaluationofhardnessandenergyabsorptionofsomecommerciallyavailablechairsidesiliconebasedsoftdenturelinersandaheatcuredsoftdentureliner
AT madkhlihanay comparativeevaluationofhardnessandenergyabsorptionofsomecommerciallyavailablechairsidesiliconebasedsoftdenturelinersandaheatcuredsoftdentureliner
AT somailidawoodm comparativeevaluationofhardnessandenergyabsorptionofsomecommerciallyavailablechairsidesiliconebasedsoftdenturelinersandaheatcuredsoftdentureliner
AT mobarkiyahyamy comparativeevaluationofhardnessandenergyabsorptionofsomecommerciallyavailablechairsidesiliconebasedsoftdenturelinersandaheatcuredsoftdentureliner
AT darrajomarahmed comparativeevaluationofhardnessandenergyabsorptionofsomecommerciallyavailablechairsidesiliconebasedsoftdenturelinersandaheatcuredsoftdentureliner
AT halawisultanm comparativeevaluationofhardnessandenergyabsorptionofsomecommerciallyavailablechairsidesiliconebasedsoftdenturelinersandaheatcuredsoftdentureliner
AT almoaleemmohammedm comparativeevaluationofhardnessandenergyabsorptionofsomecommerciallyavailablechairsidesiliconebasedsoftdenturelinersandaheatcuredsoftdentureliner