Cargando…

Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Correlation With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is clinically assessed and staged commonly by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvic floor is an emerging modality for anatomical and functional assessment of the pelvic floor and staging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jha, Pallavi, Sarawagi, Radha, Malik, Rajesh, Kumar, Aman, Pushpalatha, K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814774
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44915
_version_ 1785117752938201088
author Jha, Pallavi
Sarawagi, Radha
Malik, Rajesh
Kumar, Aman
Pushpalatha, K
author_facet Jha, Pallavi
Sarawagi, Radha
Malik, Rajesh
Kumar, Aman
Pushpalatha, K
author_sort Jha, Pallavi
collection PubMed
description Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is clinically assessed and staged commonly by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvic floor is an emerging modality for anatomical and functional assessment of the pelvic floor and staging of POP. The purpose of this study was to correlate the dynamic MRI findings with POP-Q examination for the staging of POP in each pelvic compartment by comparing various anatomic points. Methods: A prospective observational study of the comparative cross-sectional design was conducted among patients who underwent MRI of the pelvic floor and POP-Q at our institute. A total of 50 patients were included. Anatomical landmarks in the three compartments were analyzed in relation to standard reference lines on dynamic MRI and compared with POP-Q measurements. Results: Most of our patients had multicompartment disease (70%). When compared to POP-Q, MRI has a strong correlation for quantification of anterior (0.723) and middle (0.525) compartments and a weak correlation (0.232) for posterior compartment prolapse. Conclusion: POP-Q examination is based on the various points within the vaginal canal, and all the points do not represent a true anatomic landmark. MRI, on the other hand, is based on a true anatomical plane and gives detailed information about various structures in all three compartments. Thus, MRI also helps bridge the gap between various referring specialties in treating pelvic floor disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10560544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105605442023-10-09 Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Correlation With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Jha, Pallavi Sarawagi, Radha Malik, Rajesh Kumar, Aman Pushpalatha, K Cureus Radiology Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is clinically assessed and staged commonly by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvic floor is an emerging modality for anatomical and functional assessment of the pelvic floor and staging of POP. The purpose of this study was to correlate the dynamic MRI findings with POP-Q examination for the staging of POP in each pelvic compartment by comparing various anatomic points. Methods: A prospective observational study of the comparative cross-sectional design was conducted among patients who underwent MRI of the pelvic floor and POP-Q at our institute. A total of 50 patients were included. Anatomical landmarks in the three compartments were analyzed in relation to standard reference lines on dynamic MRI and compared with POP-Q measurements. Results: Most of our patients had multicompartment disease (70%). When compared to POP-Q, MRI has a strong correlation for quantification of anterior (0.723) and middle (0.525) compartments and a weak correlation (0.232) for posterior compartment prolapse. Conclusion: POP-Q examination is based on the various points within the vaginal canal, and all the points do not represent a true anatomic landmark. MRI, on the other hand, is based on a true anatomical plane and gives detailed information about various structures in all three compartments. Thus, MRI also helps bridge the gap between various referring specialties in treating pelvic floor disorders. Cureus 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10560544/ /pubmed/37814774 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44915 Text en Copyright © 2023, Jha et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Radiology
Jha, Pallavi
Sarawagi, Radha
Malik, Rajesh
Kumar, Aman
Pushpalatha, K
Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Correlation With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification
title Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Correlation With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification
title_full Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Correlation With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification
title_fullStr Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Correlation With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification
title_full_unstemmed Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Correlation With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification
title_short Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Correlation With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification
title_sort static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in female pelvic floor dysfunction: correlation with pelvic organ prolapse quantification
topic Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814774
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44915
work_keys_str_mv AT jhapallavi staticanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginfemalepelvicfloordysfunctioncorrelationwithpelvicorganprolapsequantification
AT sarawagiradha staticanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginfemalepelvicfloordysfunctioncorrelationwithpelvicorganprolapsequantification
AT malikrajesh staticanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginfemalepelvicfloordysfunctioncorrelationwithpelvicorganprolapsequantification
AT kumaraman staticanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginfemalepelvicfloordysfunctioncorrelationwithpelvicorganprolapsequantification
AT pushpalathak staticanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginfemalepelvicfloordysfunctioncorrelationwithpelvicorganprolapsequantification