Cargando…
Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator
OBJECTIVES: To review radiation exposure during emergency ureteric stent insertion to identify differences based on operator experience, specialty operator and stone characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective audit over 10 years was performed for patients who underwent emergency stent in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.245 |
_version_ | 1785117762948956160 |
---|---|
author | Tree, Kevin Chang, Nicholas Huynh, Roy Indrajit, Balasubramaniam Fisher, Dean Baskaranathan, Sris |
author_facet | Tree, Kevin Chang, Nicholas Huynh, Roy Indrajit, Balasubramaniam Fisher, Dean Baskaranathan, Sris |
author_sort | Tree, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To review radiation exposure during emergency ureteric stent insertion to identify differences based on operator experience, specialty operator and stone characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective audit over 10 years was performed for patients who underwent emergency stent insertion for urolithiasis with intraoperative fluoroscopy. Outcomes measured included operator experience, radiation exposure (mGy), dose area product (Gy/cm(2)), fluoroscopy time, stone characteristics and patient BMI. Analysis was performed in IBM SPSS Version 28. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Four hundred ten patients were identified, with a median age of 57 years, 64.6% male and a median BMI of 30. Urolithiasis was left‐sided in 50.8%, with a median size of 7 mm and predominantly proximal (49%) followed by mid (34.5%) and distal (12.1%) location. Median radiation exposure was 12.6 mGy, 2.94 Gy/cm(2) and fluoroscopy time 44.5 s, with no significant difference between consultants and registrars. No significant association between radiation exposure for subgroups of stone location, gender, size, laterality or specialty registrar (general surgery vs. urology). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in radiation exposure was identified between registrars and consultants or between subspecialty registrars. We suggest formal radiation safety education for all health professionals involved with intra‐operative fluoroscopy and personal dosimeters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10560617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105606172023-10-10 Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator Tree, Kevin Chang, Nicholas Huynh, Roy Indrajit, Balasubramaniam Fisher, Dean Baskaranathan, Sris BJUI Compass Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To review radiation exposure during emergency ureteric stent insertion to identify differences based on operator experience, specialty operator and stone characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective audit over 10 years was performed for patients who underwent emergency stent insertion for urolithiasis with intraoperative fluoroscopy. Outcomes measured included operator experience, radiation exposure (mGy), dose area product (Gy/cm(2)), fluoroscopy time, stone characteristics and patient BMI. Analysis was performed in IBM SPSS Version 28. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Four hundred ten patients were identified, with a median age of 57 years, 64.6% male and a median BMI of 30. Urolithiasis was left‐sided in 50.8%, with a median size of 7 mm and predominantly proximal (49%) followed by mid (34.5%) and distal (12.1%) location. Median radiation exposure was 12.6 mGy, 2.94 Gy/cm(2) and fluoroscopy time 44.5 s, with no significant difference between consultants and registrars. No significant association between radiation exposure for subgroups of stone location, gender, size, laterality or specialty registrar (general surgery vs. urology). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in radiation exposure was identified between registrars and consultants or between subspecialty registrars. We suggest formal radiation safety education for all health professionals involved with intra‐operative fluoroscopy and personal dosimeters. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10560617/ /pubmed/37818026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.245 Text en © 2023 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Tree, Kevin Chang, Nicholas Huynh, Roy Indrajit, Balasubramaniam Fisher, Dean Baskaranathan, Sris Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator |
title | Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator |
title_full | Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator |
title_fullStr | Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator |
title_short | Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator |
title_sort | radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: a subgroup analysis by operator |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT treekevin radiationexposureinemergencyuretericstentingasubgroupanalysisbyoperator AT changnicholas radiationexposureinemergencyuretericstentingasubgroupanalysisbyoperator AT huynhroy radiationexposureinemergencyuretericstentingasubgroupanalysisbyoperator AT indrajitbalasubramaniam radiationexposureinemergencyuretericstentingasubgroupanalysisbyoperator AT fisherdean radiationexposureinemergencyuretericstentingasubgroupanalysisbyoperator AT baskaranathansris radiationexposureinemergencyuretericstentingasubgroupanalysisbyoperator |