Cargando…

Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator

OBJECTIVES: To review radiation exposure during emergency ureteric stent insertion to identify differences based on operator experience, specialty operator and stone characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective audit over 10 years was performed for patients who underwent emergency stent in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tree, Kevin, Chang, Nicholas, Huynh, Roy, Indrajit, Balasubramaniam, Fisher, Dean, Baskaranathan, Sris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.245
_version_ 1785117762948956160
author Tree, Kevin
Chang, Nicholas
Huynh, Roy
Indrajit, Balasubramaniam
Fisher, Dean
Baskaranathan, Sris
author_facet Tree, Kevin
Chang, Nicholas
Huynh, Roy
Indrajit, Balasubramaniam
Fisher, Dean
Baskaranathan, Sris
author_sort Tree, Kevin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To review radiation exposure during emergency ureteric stent insertion to identify differences based on operator experience, specialty operator and stone characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective audit over 10 years was performed for patients who underwent emergency stent insertion for urolithiasis with intraoperative fluoroscopy. Outcomes measured included operator experience, radiation exposure (mGy), dose area product (Gy/cm(2)), fluoroscopy time, stone characteristics and patient BMI. Analysis was performed in IBM SPSS Version 28. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Four hundred ten patients were identified, with a median age of 57 years, 64.6% male and a median BMI of 30. Urolithiasis was left‐sided in 50.8%, with a median size of 7 mm and predominantly proximal (49%) followed by mid (34.5%) and distal (12.1%) location. Median radiation exposure was 12.6 mGy, 2.94 Gy/cm(2) and fluoroscopy time 44.5 s, with no significant difference between consultants and registrars. No significant association between radiation exposure for subgroups of stone location, gender, size, laterality or specialty registrar (general surgery vs. urology). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in radiation exposure was identified between registrars and consultants or between subspecialty registrars. We suggest formal radiation safety education for all health professionals involved with intra‐operative fluoroscopy and personal dosimeters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10560617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105606172023-10-10 Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator Tree, Kevin Chang, Nicholas Huynh, Roy Indrajit, Balasubramaniam Fisher, Dean Baskaranathan, Sris BJUI Compass Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To review radiation exposure during emergency ureteric stent insertion to identify differences based on operator experience, specialty operator and stone characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective audit over 10 years was performed for patients who underwent emergency stent insertion for urolithiasis with intraoperative fluoroscopy. Outcomes measured included operator experience, radiation exposure (mGy), dose area product (Gy/cm(2)), fluoroscopy time, stone characteristics and patient BMI. Analysis was performed in IBM SPSS Version 28. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Four hundred ten patients were identified, with a median age of 57 years, 64.6% male and a median BMI of 30. Urolithiasis was left‐sided in 50.8%, with a median size of 7 mm and predominantly proximal (49%) followed by mid (34.5%) and distal (12.1%) location. Median radiation exposure was 12.6 mGy, 2.94 Gy/cm(2) and fluoroscopy time 44.5 s, with no significant difference between consultants and registrars. No significant association between radiation exposure for subgroups of stone location, gender, size, laterality or specialty registrar (general surgery vs. urology). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in radiation exposure was identified between registrars and consultants or between subspecialty registrars. We suggest formal radiation safety education for all health professionals involved with intra‐operative fluoroscopy and personal dosimeters. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10560617/ /pubmed/37818026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.245 Text en © 2023 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tree, Kevin
Chang, Nicholas
Huynh, Roy
Indrajit, Balasubramaniam
Fisher, Dean
Baskaranathan, Sris
Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator
title Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator
title_full Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator
title_fullStr Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator
title_full_unstemmed Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator
title_short Radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: A subgroup analysis by operator
title_sort radiation exposure in emergency ureteric stenting: a subgroup analysis by operator
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.245
work_keys_str_mv AT treekevin radiationexposureinemergencyuretericstentingasubgroupanalysisbyoperator
AT changnicholas radiationexposureinemergencyuretericstentingasubgroupanalysisbyoperator
AT huynhroy radiationexposureinemergencyuretericstentingasubgroupanalysisbyoperator
AT indrajitbalasubramaniam radiationexposureinemergencyuretericstentingasubgroupanalysisbyoperator
AT fisherdean radiationexposureinemergencyuretericstentingasubgroupanalysisbyoperator
AT baskaranathansris radiationexposureinemergencyuretericstentingasubgroupanalysisbyoperator