Cargando…

Selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: Susceptibility pattern in Türkiye

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to determine the most appropriate antimicrobial agents for prophylactic antibiotic use during emergency and elective transurethral procedures. METHODS: The study was conducted in five hospitals located in five different geographical regions of Türkiye. The microor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keten, Tanju, Balcı, Melih, Eroğlu, Ünsal, Özercan, Ali Yasin, Coşer, Şeref, Başboğa, Serdar, Tatlıcı, Koray, Erkan, Anıl, Şenel, Çağdaş, Salar, Remzi, Güzel, Özer, Aslan, Yılmaz, Tuncel, Altuğ, Atan, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37681729
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.99663
_version_ 1785117805562036224
author Keten, Tanju
Balcı, Melih
Eroğlu, Ünsal
Özercan, Ali Yasin
Coşer, Şeref
Başboğa, Serdar
Tatlıcı, Koray
Erkan, Anıl
Şenel, Çağdaş
Salar, Remzi
Güzel, Özer
Aslan, Yılmaz
Tuncel, Altuğ
Atan, Ali
author_facet Keten, Tanju
Balcı, Melih
Eroğlu, Ünsal
Özercan, Ali Yasin
Coşer, Şeref
Başboğa, Serdar
Tatlıcı, Koray
Erkan, Anıl
Şenel, Çağdaş
Salar, Remzi
Güzel, Özer
Aslan, Yılmaz
Tuncel, Altuğ
Atan, Ali
author_sort Keten, Tanju
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to determine the most appropriate antimicrobial agents for prophylactic antibiotic use during emergency and elective transurethral procedures. METHODS: The study was conducted in five hospitals located in five different geographical regions of Türkiye. The microorganism cultured in urine before emergency and elective transurethral procedures in these centers between March 2021 and March 2022 were reviewed retrospectively from the hospital records. Demographic data (age and gender) of the patients, comorbid disorders, previous urological procedures, anomalies of the urogenital tract, use of urethral catheters (permanent or clean intermittent catheterization), cultured microorganisms, and antibiotic susceptibilities were noted. The patients hospitalized or had antibiotics for any reason in the previous 1 month were excluded from the study. RESULTS: A total of 1450 patients, 742 men (51.2%) and 708 women (48.8%), were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 55.3±19.36 (1–98) years. Diabetes mellitus was evident in 271 (18.7%) patients. The five most common microorganisms cultured in urine, in order of frequency, were: ESBL (-) Escherichia coli in 418 (28.8%), ESBL (+) E. coli in 309 (21.3%), Klebsiella pneumonia in 183 (12.6%), Enterococcus faecalis in 124 (8.6%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 89 (6.1%). The susceptibility rates to antimicrobial agents recommended for prophylaxis by the American Urology Association and the European Association of Urology guidelines were found as follows: cefepime 87.1%, ampicillin+sulbactam 84%, TMP-SMX 71.6%, amoxicillin+clavulanate 63.5%, cefoxitin 59%, ceftazidime 58.6%, cefuroxime 43.5%, ceftriaxone 43%, and cefixime 38.4%. CONCLUSION: We found that currently recommended antimicrobials provide poor coverage for the most common pathogens isolated. Urologists should consider patient-based antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic urethral procedures, follow appropriate protocols, and consider local antibiotic resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10560822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105608222023-10-10 Selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: Susceptibility pattern in Türkiye Keten, Tanju Balcı, Melih Eroğlu, Ünsal Özercan, Ali Yasin Coşer, Şeref Başboğa, Serdar Tatlıcı, Koray Erkan, Anıl Şenel, Çağdaş Salar, Remzi Güzel, Özer Aslan, Yılmaz Tuncel, Altuğ Atan, Ali Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to determine the most appropriate antimicrobial agents for prophylactic antibiotic use during emergency and elective transurethral procedures. METHODS: The study was conducted in five hospitals located in five different geographical regions of Türkiye. The microorganism cultured in urine before emergency and elective transurethral procedures in these centers between March 2021 and March 2022 were reviewed retrospectively from the hospital records. Demographic data (age and gender) of the patients, comorbid disorders, previous urological procedures, anomalies of the urogenital tract, use of urethral catheters (permanent or clean intermittent catheterization), cultured microorganisms, and antibiotic susceptibilities were noted. The patients hospitalized or had antibiotics for any reason in the previous 1 month were excluded from the study. RESULTS: A total of 1450 patients, 742 men (51.2%) and 708 women (48.8%), were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 55.3±19.36 (1–98) years. Diabetes mellitus was evident in 271 (18.7%) patients. The five most common microorganisms cultured in urine, in order of frequency, were: ESBL (-) Escherichia coli in 418 (28.8%), ESBL (+) E. coli in 309 (21.3%), Klebsiella pneumonia in 183 (12.6%), Enterococcus faecalis in 124 (8.6%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 89 (6.1%). The susceptibility rates to antimicrobial agents recommended for prophylaxis by the American Urology Association and the European Association of Urology guidelines were found as follows: cefepime 87.1%, ampicillin+sulbactam 84%, TMP-SMX 71.6%, amoxicillin+clavulanate 63.5%, cefoxitin 59%, ceftazidime 58.6%, cefuroxime 43.5%, ceftriaxone 43%, and cefixime 38.4%. CONCLUSION: We found that currently recommended antimicrobials provide poor coverage for the most common pathogens isolated. Urologists should consider patient-based antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic urethral procedures, follow appropriate protocols, and consider local antibiotic resistance. Kare Publishing 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10560822/ /pubmed/37681729 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.99663 Text en Copyright © 2023 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Keten, Tanju
Balcı, Melih
Eroğlu, Ünsal
Özercan, Ali Yasin
Coşer, Şeref
Başboğa, Serdar
Tatlıcı, Koray
Erkan, Anıl
Şenel, Çağdaş
Salar, Remzi
Güzel, Özer
Aslan, Yılmaz
Tuncel, Altuğ
Atan, Ali
Selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: Susceptibility pattern in Türkiye
title Selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: Susceptibility pattern in Türkiye
title_full Selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: Susceptibility pattern in Türkiye
title_fullStr Selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: Susceptibility pattern in Türkiye
title_full_unstemmed Selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: Susceptibility pattern in Türkiye
title_short Selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: Susceptibility pattern in Türkiye
title_sort selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: susceptibility pattern in türkiye
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37681729
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.99663
work_keys_str_mv AT ketentanju selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT balcımelih selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT erogluunsal selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT ozercanaliyasin selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT coserseref selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT basbogaserdar selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT tatlıcıkoray selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT erkananıl selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT senelcagdas selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT salarremzi selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT guzelozer selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT aslanyılmaz selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT tuncelaltug selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye
AT atanali selectionforantimicrobialprophylaxisinemergencyandelectivetransurethralproceduressusceptibilitypatterninturkiye