Cargando…

Accuracy of attenuation coefficient measurement (ACM) for real-time ultrasound hepatic steatometry: Comparison of simulator/phantom data with magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF)

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of real time ultrasound (US) steatometry with the Attenuation Coefficient (AC) measurement in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging with proton density software module (MRI-PDFF). METHODS: This study was conducted between January 2021 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobyliak, Nazarii, Dynnyk, Oleh, Savytska, Maryana, Solodovnyk, Oleksandr, Zakomornyi, Oleksandr, Оmеlchenko, Oleksii, Kushnir, Anton, Titorenko, Roman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20642
_version_ 1785117809369415680
author Kobyliak, Nazarii
Dynnyk, Oleh
Savytska, Maryana
Solodovnyk, Oleksandr
Zakomornyi, Oleksandr
Оmеlchenko, Oleksii
Kushnir, Anton
Titorenko, Roman
author_facet Kobyliak, Nazarii
Dynnyk, Oleh
Savytska, Maryana
Solodovnyk, Oleksandr
Zakomornyi, Oleksandr
Оmеlchenko, Oleksii
Kushnir, Anton
Titorenko, Roman
author_sort Kobyliak, Nazarii
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of real time ultrasound (US) steatometry with the Attenuation Coefficient (AC) measurement in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging with proton density software module (MRI-PDFF). METHODS: This study was conducted between January 2021 and October 2021. The comparison of instrumental methods for assessing and grading hepatic steatosis using a multimodal phantom simulator of different fat and water ratios was performed. The study involved 3 radiological centers. The steatophantom was simultaneously investigated using three methods: magnetic resonance imaging with proton density software module (MRI-PDFF) and 128-slice multidetector computed tomography, and then by 2 different US scanner for steatosis assessment via Measurement Attenuation Imaging (ATI) ant Attenuation Coefficient Measurement (ACM). RESULTS: Modeling of hepatic steatosis using a series of phantom simulators allows evidence-based medicine to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the latest US techniques for steatosis. The ACM and ATI of both US systems on phantoms correlated well with each other and with MRI-PDFF and, thus, can provide good diagnostic value in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. MDCT was less sensitive to mild steatosis than AC and MRI-PDFF. CONCLUSION: Measurement of ACs in US studies by devices from different vendors compared to other modalities of radiological imaging (MDCT and MRI-PDFF) by special phantoms is an accurate and promising method for noninvasive quantification of hepatic steatosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10560839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105608392023-10-10 Accuracy of attenuation coefficient measurement (ACM) for real-time ultrasound hepatic steatometry: Comparison of simulator/phantom data with magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) Kobyliak, Nazarii Dynnyk, Oleh Savytska, Maryana Solodovnyk, Oleksandr Zakomornyi, Oleksandr Оmеlchenko, Oleksii Kushnir, Anton Titorenko, Roman Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of real time ultrasound (US) steatometry with the Attenuation Coefficient (AC) measurement in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging with proton density software module (MRI-PDFF). METHODS: This study was conducted between January 2021 and October 2021. The comparison of instrumental methods for assessing and grading hepatic steatosis using a multimodal phantom simulator of different fat and water ratios was performed. The study involved 3 radiological centers. The steatophantom was simultaneously investigated using three methods: magnetic resonance imaging with proton density software module (MRI-PDFF) and 128-slice multidetector computed tomography, and then by 2 different US scanner for steatosis assessment via Measurement Attenuation Imaging (ATI) ant Attenuation Coefficient Measurement (ACM). RESULTS: Modeling of hepatic steatosis using a series of phantom simulators allows evidence-based medicine to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the latest US techniques for steatosis. The ACM and ATI of both US systems on phantoms correlated well with each other and with MRI-PDFF and, thus, can provide good diagnostic value in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. MDCT was less sensitive to mild steatosis than AC and MRI-PDFF. CONCLUSION: Measurement of ACs in US studies by devices from different vendors compared to other modalities of radiological imaging (MDCT and MRI-PDFF) by special phantoms is an accurate and promising method for noninvasive quantification of hepatic steatosis. Elsevier 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10560839/ /pubmed/37818006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20642 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Kobyliak, Nazarii
Dynnyk, Oleh
Savytska, Maryana
Solodovnyk, Oleksandr
Zakomornyi, Oleksandr
Оmеlchenko, Oleksii
Kushnir, Anton
Titorenko, Roman
Accuracy of attenuation coefficient measurement (ACM) for real-time ultrasound hepatic steatometry: Comparison of simulator/phantom data with magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF)
title Accuracy of attenuation coefficient measurement (ACM) for real-time ultrasound hepatic steatometry: Comparison of simulator/phantom data with magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF)
title_full Accuracy of attenuation coefficient measurement (ACM) for real-time ultrasound hepatic steatometry: Comparison of simulator/phantom data with magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF)
title_fullStr Accuracy of attenuation coefficient measurement (ACM) for real-time ultrasound hepatic steatometry: Comparison of simulator/phantom data with magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF)
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of attenuation coefficient measurement (ACM) for real-time ultrasound hepatic steatometry: Comparison of simulator/phantom data with magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF)
title_short Accuracy of attenuation coefficient measurement (ACM) for real-time ultrasound hepatic steatometry: Comparison of simulator/phantom data with magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF)
title_sort accuracy of attenuation coefficient measurement (acm) for real-time ultrasound hepatic steatometry: comparison of simulator/phantom data with magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (mri-pdff)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20642
work_keys_str_mv AT kobyliaknazarii accuracyofattenuationcoefficientmeasurementacmforrealtimeultrasoundhepaticsteatometrycomparisonofsimulatorphantomdatawithmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractionmripdff
AT dynnykoleh accuracyofattenuationcoefficientmeasurementacmforrealtimeultrasoundhepaticsteatometrycomparisonofsimulatorphantomdatawithmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractionmripdff
AT savytskamaryana accuracyofattenuationcoefficientmeasurementacmforrealtimeultrasoundhepaticsteatometrycomparisonofsimulatorphantomdatawithmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractionmripdff
AT solodovnykoleksandr accuracyofattenuationcoefficientmeasurementacmforrealtimeultrasoundhepaticsteatometrycomparisonofsimulatorphantomdatawithmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractionmripdff
AT zakomornyioleksandr accuracyofattenuationcoefficientmeasurementacmforrealtimeultrasoundhepaticsteatometrycomparisonofsimulatorphantomdatawithmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractionmripdff
AT omelchenkooleksii accuracyofattenuationcoefficientmeasurementacmforrealtimeultrasoundhepaticsteatometrycomparisonofsimulatorphantomdatawithmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractionmripdff
AT kushniranton accuracyofattenuationcoefficientmeasurementacmforrealtimeultrasoundhepaticsteatometrycomparisonofsimulatorphantomdatawithmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractionmripdff
AT titorenkoroman accuracyofattenuationcoefficientmeasurementacmforrealtimeultrasoundhepaticsteatometrycomparisonofsimulatorphantomdatawithmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractionmripdff