Cargando…

Neither entrepreneurship nor intrapreneurship: a review of how to become an innovative split-off start-up

Splitting off departments from corporations in order to establish corporate start-ups has become of strategic importance for the performance and innovation of corporations. While the settlement process is widely practiced, there is a lack of knowledge of how entrepreneurship may exist in such split-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knossalla, Christina Elisabeth, Carbon, Claus-Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818038
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1267706
_version_ 1785117827842179072
author Knossalla, Christina Elisabeth
Carbon, Claus-Christian
author_facet Knossalla, Christina Elisabeth
Carbon, Claus-Christian
author_sort Knossalla, Christina Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description Splitting off departments from corporations in order to establish corporate start-ups has become of strategic importance for the performance and innovation of corporations. While the settlement process is widely practiced, there is a lack of knowledge of how entrepreneurship may exist in such split-offs. The main aim of this study was to explore how entrepreneurship in corporate start-ups can exist in order to contribute to corporate performance. Based on a systematic literature review from 2021 to 2023, which resulted in a total of 1,516 scientific, English-language articles in economic journals, a total of 150 articles were analyzed in-depth. Our research shows that it is of crucial importance that corporations position leaders with an appropriate mindset and behavior at all levels as early as starting the split-off process, which is, however, neither entrepreneurship nor intrapreneurship. The niche corporative start-up area shows that entrepreneurship is a continuum and requires a new definition of corporate start-up entrepreneurship (CSE). For corporate start-ups to be successful, we revealed that there needs to be (1) the appropriate legal form, which ensures ownership but also the risk of the leaders, (2) an explorative business rather than exploitation, (3) variable compensation rather than fixed and (4) corporate entrepreneurs rather than employees and managers. Implications of the findings for entrepreneurial leadership theory development and future research are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10560993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105609932023-10-10 Neither entrepreneurship nor intrapreneurship: a review of how to become an innovative split-off start-up Knossalla, Christina Elisabeth Carbon, Claus-Christian Front Sociol Sociology Splitting off departments from corporations in order to establish corporate start-ups has become of strategic importance for the performance and innovation of corporations. While the settlement process is widely practiced, there is a lack of knowledge of how entrepreneurship may exist in such split-offs. The main aim of this study was to explore how entrepreneurship in corporate start-ups can exist in order to contribute to corporate performance. Based on a systematic literature review from 2021 to 2023, which resulted in a total of 1,516 scientific, English-language articles in economic journals, a total of 150 articles were analyzed in-depth. Our research shows that it is of crucial importance that corporations position leaders with an appropriate mindset and behavior at all levels as early as starting the split-off process, which is, however, neither entrepreneurship nor intrapreneurship. The niche corporative start-up area shows that entrepreneurship is a continuum and requires a new definition of corporate start-up entrepreneurship (CSE). For corporate start-ups to be successful, we revealed that there needs to be (1) the appropriate legal form, which ensures ownership but also the risk of the leaders, (2) an explorative business rather than exploitation, (3) variable compensation rather than fixed and (4) corporate entrepreneurs rather than employees and managers. Implications of the findings for entrepreneurial leadership theory development and future research are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10560993/ /pubmed/37818038 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1267706 Text en Copyright © 2023 Knossalla and Carbon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sociology
Knossalla, Christina Elisabeth
Carbon, Claus-Christian
Neither entrepreneurship nor intrapreneurship: a review of how to become an innovative split-off start-up
title Neither entrepreneurship nor intrapreneurship: a review of how to become an innovative split-off start-up
title_full Neither entrepreneurship nor intrapreneurship: a review of how to become an innovative split-off start-up
title_fullStr Neither entrepreneurship nor intrapreneurship: a review of how to become an innovative split-off start-up
title_full_unstemmed Neither entrepreneurship nor intrapreneurship: a review of how to become an innovative split-off start-up
title_short Neither entrepreneurship nor intrapreneurship: a review of how to become an innovative split-off start-up
title_sort neither entrepreneurship nor intrapreneurship: a review of how to become an innovative split-off start-up
topic Sociology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818038
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1267706
work_keys_str_mv AT knossallachristinaelisabeth neitherentrepreneurshipnorintrapreneurshipareviewofhowtobecomeaninnovativesplitoffstartup
AT carbonclauschristian neitherentrepreneurshipnorintrapreneurshipareviewofhowtobecomeaninnovativesplitoffstartup