Cargando…

Length of intraabdominal measurement of bowel (LIMB)

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most commonly performed bariatric surgeries. The steep associated learning curve is dependent on the training facility, laparoscopic experience, and overall procedural volume. William Beaumont Army Medical Center (WBAMC) has been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patrick, Danielle, Rizzo, Kayla, Grasso, Sam, Schriver, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2023.09.018
_version_ 1785117854597644288
author Patrick, Danielle
Rizzo, Kayla
Grasso, Sam
Schriver, John
author_facet Patrick, Danielle
Rizzo, Kayla
Grasso, Sam
Schriver, John
author_sort Patrick, Danielle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most commonly performed bariatric surgeries. The steep associated learning curve is dependent on the training facility, laparoscopic experience, and overall procedural volume. William Beaumont Army Medical Center (WBAMC) has been accredited as a bariatric center of excellence and trains resident surgeons in the performance of RYGB. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and precision of a bariatric center of excellence's training of surgical residents in terms of laparoscopic measurements of simulated small bowel. This will act as a surrogate for how well surgical residents learn to run the small bowel during bariatric procedures and how their accuracy and precision change over time in training. SETTING: This study took place at William Beaumont Army Medical Center, a bariatric center of excellence and training institution. METHODS: Participants included surgical residents from WBAMC. Participants used a laparoscopic trainer and two bowel graspers to measure both a collapsing garden hose (simulated bowel) and a nylon rope (control material) to 75 cm (cm) and 125 cm (cm), three times each, with recordings of time required to do so, actual distance measured, and technique used. RESULTS: Fifteen residents participated in the study. Residents displayed accuracy of 21.6 %. 33%of residents were precise for the 75 cm measurement, and 53 % of residents were precise for the 125-cm measurement. PGY-4 residents were the most accurate while PGY-3 residents were the most precise. There were no statistical differences between junior (PGY 1–4) and senior residents (PGY 5–6) in accuracy or precision in the measurement of 75-cm or 125-cm. No statistical differences were found measuring the hose versus rope in accuracy nor precision. PGY-4 residents completed the task in the least amount of time while PGY-2 residents took the longest to complete each task. CONCLUSIONS: In general, residents are neither precise nor accurate in measurements of simulated bowel lengths, and experience does not contribute to either. Time in residency correlates with laparoscopic speed but not with accuracy nor precision. Extrapolating this data to attending surgeons suggests that estimated lengths of small bowel that are ‘run’ or measured during laparoscopic cases are neither accurate nor precise. More investigation must be performed in this area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10561113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105611132023-10-10 Length of intraabdominal measurement of bowel (LIMB) Patrick, Danielle Rizzo, Kayla Grasso, Sam Schriver, John Surg Open Sci Research Paper BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most commonly performed bariatric surgeries. The steep associated learning curve is dependent on the training facility, laparoscopic experience, and overall procedural volume. William Beaumont Army Medical Center (WBAMC) has been accredited as a bariatric center of excellence and trains resident surgeons in the performance of RYGB. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and precision of a bariatric center of excellence's training of surgical residents in terms of laparoscopic measurements of simulated small bowel. This will act as a surrogate for how well surgical residents learn to run the small bowel during bariatric procedures and how their accuracy and precision change over time in training. SETTING: This study took place at William Beaumont Army Medical Center, a bariatric center of excellence and training institution. METHODS: Participants included surgical residents from WBAMC. Participants used a laparoscopic trainer and two bowel graspers to measure both a collapsing garden hose (simulated bowel) and a nylon rope (control material) to 75 cm (cm) and 125 cm (cm), three times each, with recordings of time required to do so, actual distance measured, and technique used. RESULTS: Fifteen residents participated in the study. Residents displayed accuracy of 21.6 %. 33%of residents were precise for the 75 cm measurement, and 53 % of residents were precise for the 125-cm measurement. PGY-4 residents were the most accurate while PGY-3 residents were the most precise. There were no statistical differences between junior (PGY 1–4) and senior residents (PGY 5–6) in accuracy or precision in the measurement of 75-cm or 125-cm. No statistical differences were found measuring the hose versus rope in accuracy nor precision. PGY-4 residents completed the task in the least amount of time while PGY-2 residents took the longest to complete each task. CONCLUSIONS: In general, residents are neither precise nor accurate in measurements of simulated bowel lengths, and experience does not contribute to either. Time in residency correlates with laparoscopic speed but not with accuracy nor precision. Extrapolating this data to attending surgeons suggests that estimated lengths of small bowel that are ‘run’ or measured during laparoscopic cases are neither accurate nor precise. More investigation must be performed in this area. Elsevier 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10561113/ /pubmed/37818460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2023.09.018 Text en Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Patrick, Danielle
Rizzo, Kayla
Grasso, Sam
Schriver, John
Length of intraabdominal measurement of bowel (LIMB)
title Length of intraabdominal measurement of bowel (LIMB)
title_full Length of intraabdominal measurement of bowel (LIMB)
title_fullStr Length of intraabdominal measurement of bowel (LIMB)
title_full_unstemmed Length of intraabdominal measurement of bowel (LIMB)
title_short Length of intraabdominal measurement of bowel (LIMB)
title_sort length of intraabdominal measurement of bowel (limb)
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37818460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2023.09.018
work_keys_str_mv AT patrickdanielle lengthofintraabdominalmeasurementofbowellimb
AT rizzokayla lengthofintraabdominalmeasurementofbowellimb
AT grassosam lengthofintraabdominalmeasurementofbowellimb
AT schriverjohn lengthofintraabdominalmeasurementofbowellimb